reassign 676001 initramfs-tools
thanks
Reassigning the bug back to initramfs-tools where it belongs
according to my comments below and lack of any arguments to
the opposite. With all my dislike to such a ping-pong.
Thanks,
/mjt
On 05.06.2012 08:45, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
I disagree it is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 676001 initramfs-tools
Bug #676001 [busybox] initramfs-tools: busybox's switch_root doesn't handle
/proc or /sys moving
Bug reassigned from package 'busybox' to 'initramfs-tools'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #676001
Hi,
It seems the bug, at least in my case, was caused by the acpi battery
kernel module reporting the battery as connected and disconnected
continuously.
Since I upgraded my kernel to 3.2.18-1 the battery icon stopped
flipping on and off and the cpu use by upowerd is pretty much normal.
upowerd
Hi,
On 06/07/2012 11:22 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 09:05:42AM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
I have seen similar crashes with the 6.0.x kernel on some of our
systems. Unfortunately the systems are in a remote location and I
was unable to capture any crash screens.
[...]
This
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:1.2.6-2
Severity: important
After upgrading nfs-kernel-server, it fails to start, complaining that there
are no exports.
service nfs-kernel-server start
Not starting NFS kernel daemon: no exports. ... (warning).
I do not have any changes to
Am 04.06.2012 23:30, schrieb Arnaud Patard (Rtp):
One should never draw conclusions in bug reports, but when browsing
the kernel config posted for the original vexpress wish (#670462),
there is an nfsrootfs configured in CMDLINE option. So I guess the
requestor checked that with a rootfs over
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 676001 busybox
Bug #676001 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: busybox's switch_root doesn't
handle /proc or /sys moving
Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'busybox'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #676001
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 659752 + pending
Bug #659752 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: patch for copy_exec - quote
${src} and add pattern for nonoptimized libraries on multiarch
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
dude care to have a bit of patience before reassigning back,
that be really nice.
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:45:59AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 05.06.2012 00:45, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 676001 busybox
Bug #676001
[Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list]
Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed
against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how
/proc and /sys filesystem should be handled in initramfs
when switching to new root. Original reporter included
a trivial patch for initramfs that does
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 581377 0.70
Bug #581377 {Done: Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org} [initramfs-tools]
initramfs-tools: Multipath does not load correctly at boot time
There is no source info for the package 'initramfs-tools' at version '0.70'
with architecture
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
archive 581377
Bug #581377 {Done: Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org} [initramfs-tools]
initramfs-tools: Multipath does not load correctly at boot time
archived 581377 to archive/77 (from 581377)
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On 08.06.2012 14:59, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
Wonderful.
I asked you nicely a) to stop reassigning without explanation,
and b) to provide some comments about why do you think it is
a busybox isue, at the same time providing my reasoning why
it is not.
Ok. This was premature. Somehow I
On 08.06.2012 14:52, maximilian attems wrote:
dude care to have a bit of patience before reassigning back,
that be really nice.
I gave a few days, maybe it was too few, I dunno.
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:45:59AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
I disagree it is a busybox problem, and don't
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:10:42PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 08.06.2012 14:52, maximilian attems wrote:
dude care to have a bit of patience before reassigning back,
that be really nice.
I gave a few days, maybe it was too few, I dunno.
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:45:59AM +0400,
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:59:26PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list]
Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed
against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how
/proc and /sys filesystem should be handled in initramfs
when switching to new
On Thu, 31 May 2012, Manu Benoît wrote:
Alright, got the log you requested.
Ok, thanks. I will have to think about this whole thing a little bit more,
but as a first step, could you please try with the patch below to see if
it makes any difference and makes the device behave correctly?
Am 06.06.2012 01:08, schrieb Marcus Osdoba:
Recently I tried to cross compile a kernel (package) with make
ARCH=target CROSS_COMPILE=target-triplet- deb-pkg
That worked well for 2.6.32 kernels from squeeze. But the 3.2 kernels
from wheezy/backports fail with:
[..]
Since cross compiling
Forwarded Message
From: Olaf Rühenbeck some.individ...@googlemail.com
To: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Subject: Re: Bug#674427: Frequent freezes during run- and boot time due to
kernel module general protection fault
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:28:59 +0200
On Mon, 28 May
Josh Triplett wrote:
Less so, but yes. As far as I know, sbs-battery drives a superset of
hardware, but bq20z75 does drive a useful subset (though one that
doesn't include the hardware I actually have). Having bq20z75 in the
wheezy 3.2 kernel wouldn't serve the particular purpose I had in
Yury O. Tabolin wrote:
06.06.2012 20:32, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
How long does it typically take to reproduce the problem?
I'll try that next week. I can't before, because this server is in
production and restart it is some problem. I will give all
information as soon as it will done.
Ok,
On 08.06.2012 15:28, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:59:26PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list]
Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed
against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how
/proc and /sys filesystem should be
tags 86 moreinfo
reassign 86 linux-2.6
stop
Kernel: Linux 3.3.0-kevinoid1
Hmm you are using an home-brew linux image.
I can't verify your assumption here on official linux image 3.2
or 3.4 from experimental on old X61s.
Can you still reproduce it? Did you try official linux images?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 86 moreinfo
Bug #86 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: thinkpad_acpi does not load
automatically if not in initramfs
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
reassign 86 linux-2.6
Bug #86 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: thinkpad_acpi does
Hi again,
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Buford Peek wrote:
So far everything is looking good..We do NOT run a stock config so I
have recompiled the kernel with our specific config and will run LTP
testing on the system to determine if their are any more issues.
Thanks again. How did it go?
Hi Gurus,
My customer just bought a PowerEdge R620 with H710, and their OS is Debian 6.0.
they failed to install Debian 6.0 on R620. I searched Debian bugs, and found
this bug was fixed. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666108
I have poor linux skill, having difficulty to
Hi,
gator_...@dell.com wrote[1]:
My customer just bought a PowerEdge R620 with H710, and their OS is
Debian 6.0. they failed to install Debian 6.0 on R620. I searched
Debian bugs, and found this bug was fixed.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666108
I have poor linux skill,
gator_...@dell.com wrote:
thank you. where can i download the updated kernel?
I'll build one. Is the customer using the 32-bit (i386) or 64-bit
(amd64) version of the OS?
Here are instructions for building a patched kernel on the same kind
of Debian system, from a directory containing the
thank you. where can i download the updated kernel?
Thanks,
Gator
Sent from Android phone.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Nieder [mailto:jrnie...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 07:08 PM GMT Standard Time
To: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Cc: Yin, Gator;
Customer uses 64bit debian (intel x86-64 cpu, E5-26xx).
Gator
Sent from Android phone.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Nieder [mailto:jrnie...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 07:24 PM GMT Standard Time
To: Yin, Gator
Cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org;
It was self-configured and compiled from an unmodified linus 3.3.0 tree.
Unfortunately, the power supply in the machine died and I do not have
another ThinkPad with which to test. If you think the problem is
possibly due to differences between the linus kernel and the
Debian-patched kernel,
tags 636306 - moreinfo
forcemerge 657078 636306
quit
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Although the new idmapper may be the way forward, we're stuck with the
old implementation for now. We should still be able to get rid of the
huge allocation though.
Ah, didn't notice this was already filed. Merging.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 636306 - moreinfo
Bug #636306 [linux-2.6] mount.nfs: page allocation failure. order:4, mode:0xc0d0
Bug #646889 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Since I'm using nfsd instead
of samba a kerneloops occurs when accessing the files on server
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 676360 serious
Bug #676360 [src:linux-2.6] nouveau: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 0/7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
676360:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.19-1
Severity: normal
After switching from nvidia to noveau linux sometime panic. I've made some
screenshots of that crash, here (handwritten) begin of crash:
general protection fault: [#1] SMP
CPU 0
...
Call Trace:
IRQ
nv50_display_isr+0x1ae/0x2b4 [nouveau]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
clone 676360 -1
Bug #676360 [src:linux-2.6] nouveau: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 0/7
Bug 676360 cloned as bug 676705
retitle 676360 xen: oops at atomic64_read_cx8+0x4
Bug #676360 [src:linux-2.6] nouveau: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 0/7
Changed Bug title to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
clone 676360 -1
Bug #676360 [src:linux-2.6] xen: oops at atomic64_read_cx8+0x4
Bug 676360 cloned as bug 676706
severity 676360 normal
Bug #676360 [src:linux-2.6] xen: oops at atomic64_read_cx8+0x4
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
retitle
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 676360 + pending
Bug #676360 [src:linux-2.6] xen: oops at atomic64_read_cx8+0x4
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
676360:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 676360 serious
Bug #676360 [src:linux-2.6] xen: oops at atomic64_read_cx8+0x4
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
# oops, mid-air collision in the BTS
close 676706
Bug #676706 [src:linux-2.6] [i386] Boot failure under Xen,
I plan to release Linux 3.2.20 on Sunday or Monday, with the usual
mixture of important bug fixes and trivial changes for new hardware
support.
I intend to upload to unstable shortly after. Note that the source
package name will at last change from 'linux-2.6' to 'linux', and the
format will
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 676704 important
Bug #676704 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: GPF in nouveau module
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
676704:
Your message dated Sat, 9 Jun 2012 00:26:08 -0500
with message-id 20120609052608.GA13100@burratino
and subject line Re: megasas: Failed to alloc kernel SGL buffer for IOCTL
has caused the Debian Bug report #604627,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: megasas: Failed to alloc kernel SGL
buffer
42 matches
Mail list logo
