Hi,
For that you have to install linux-image-5.9.0-3-amd64 from unstable.
It will go into testing automatically in some time, like 2 weeks.
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:33:03 -0500 Cubed wrote:
> Good morning.
>
> I was notified today that this bug had been resolved. As someone somewhat
> new to TV in
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 03:53:32PM -0800, Flavio Veloso Soares wrote:
> Unfortunately, I couldn't find many comprehensive benchmarks of kernel
> CONFIG_PREEMPT* options. The one at
>
> [1]https://www.codeblueprint.co.uk/2019/12/23/linux-preemption-latency-throughput.html
> seems to be very
On 2020-11-22 2:28 p.m., Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 13:45 -0800, Flavio Veloso Soares wrote:
[Resending: just noticed that the reply I sent on Oct 23 didn't include
b.d.o]
I don't think the article is about the same thing we're talking here.
CONFIG_PREEMPT* options control the
On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 13:45 -0800, Flavio Veloso Soares wrote:
> [Resending: just noticed that the reply I sent on Oct 23 didn't include
> b.d.o]
>
> I don't think the article is about the same thing we're talking here.
> CONFIG_PREEMPT* options control the compromise between latency and
>
[Resending: just noticed that the reply I sent on Oct 23 didn't include
b.d.o]
I don't think the article is about the same thing we're talking here.
CONFIG_PREEMPT* options control the compromise between latency and
throughput of *system calls* and *scheduling of CPU cycles spent in
kernel
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 07:41:05PM +, Toni wrote:
> > Severity: critical
>
> Sorry, no. This problem does not break the package for everyone.
>
> > On the console, after dmesg, these three lines repeat ad nauseum:
> >
Hi,
I suspect it may have to do with the 5th gen (Broadwell Desktop) only,
as they have a very special (and powerful) iGPU.
And maybe that's why the bug passed inadvertently so much time:
those CPUs didn't sell very well.
Yes, I have that package installed:
||/ NameVersion
Hi,
I have Intel i5 4th generation and I have no such problem with Linux
kernel 5.9.6.
Do you have "intel-microcode" package installed on those computers?
Kind regards
Georgi
Hi,
I received no answer at all, so I guess you are very busy.
I know the bug was introduced somewhere between 5.6 and 5.7.
If you have an idea of what the source of the bug could be,
I'd like to help by testing on my computers,
or providing code.
I have two computers with similar CPUs
9 matches
Mail list logo
