Package: firmware-amd-graphics
Version: 20230625-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
A long time ago on a motherboard far away lived an AMD graphics card
code-named Cedar.
Cedar
Ben Hutchings wrote on 26/04/17 12:41:
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 17:18:28 +0200 Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de> wrote:
On 2017-04-25 12:52 +0930, Arthur Marsh wrote:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.129
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please co
Sven Joachim wrote on 26/04/17 00:48:
On 2017-04-25 12:52 +0930, Arthur Marsh wrote:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.129
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
set RESUME=none
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.129
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
set RESUME=none in /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf but
still get messages:
W: initramfs-tools
Julien Cristau wrote on 19/03/16 20:09:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 15:46:46 +1030, Arthur Marsh wrote:
I usually run custom kernels based off the configuration of recent
Debian kernels.
I notice that as of 4.4.0-1-amd64 (and hence also linux-image-4.5.0-rc7-amd64)
that CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.4.6-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I usually run custom kernels based off the configuration of recent
Debian kernels.
I notice that as of
This is no way an acceptable patch. The driver needs to be converted
properly to the Linux 2.6+ device model, instead of adding further
kluges to it.
Ben.
Thanks, that patch wasn't provided by me. The old driver just broke
during other updates and that patch was provided as a workaround
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.3.3-2
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream patch
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Attempting to load a kernel later than 4.2.0.
* What exactly did you do (or not do)
Ben Hutchings wrote on 07/12/15 09:33:
Control: reassign -1 src:linux 3.17-1~exp1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 23:42:56 +1030 Arthur Marsh <arthur.ma...@internode.on.net>
wrote:
[...]
Hi, I still have the issue that with initramfstools later than 0.116 (ie
0.117 and
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.119
Followup-For: Bug #781239
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
After reproducing the problem by using:
tune2fs -C 99
on the root filesystem of my machine
Package: initramfs-tools
Followup-For: Bug #763516
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
version 0.119 of initramfs-tools fixed this problem but left one without
any feedback on the progress of a forced fsck of the root filesystem
nor
Ben Hutchings wrote, on 13/10/14 06:16:
On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 02:38 +1030, Arthur Marsh wrote:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.116
Followup-For: Bug #764572
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.116
Followup-For: Bug #764572
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Another datapoint. I have a hard disk whose filesystems are *not* mounted
at start-up, but after
-10-01 15:34 GMT+04:00 Arthur Marsh arthur.ma...@internode.on.net:
I managed to complete a git bisect -- fs/cifs:
git bisect good
69cebd75606f8b9162ad5d0104367370ceabeeba is the first bad commit
commit 69cebd75606f8b9162ad5d0104367370ceabeeba
Author: Pavel Shilovsky pshilov...@samba.org
Date
restarting Samba?
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Arthur Marsh
arthur.ma...@internode.on.net wrote:
Hi, I just did:
aplay file-on-server.wav
where the file was several minutes long and I could repeatedly restart the
samba server if I wanted to, but if I had a crash it happened on the first
Pavel Shilovsky wrote, on 02/10/14 19:03:
2014-10-01 15:34 GMT+04:00 Arthur Marsh arthur.ma...@internode.on.net:
I managed to complete a git bisect -- fs/cifs:
git bisect good
69cebd75606f8b9162ad5d0104367370ceabeeba is the first bad commit
commit 69cebd75606f8b9162ad5d0104367370ceabeeba
Pavel Shilovsky wrote, on 01/10/14 10:32:
2014-09-30 18:49 GMT+04:00 Arthur Marsh arthur.ma...@internode.on.net:
Pardon the top post but I tried the same thing on my dual core Pentium 4
machine mounting via cifs a filesytem on my AMD64 (quad core) machine, then
running aplay /mnt
before with the client
being on the quad-core AMD64 machine and the server being the Pentium 4
machine, a nasty lock-up pointing to similar code.
Has anyone else been able to reproduce this problem?
Regards,
Arthur Marsh.
Arthur Marsh wrote, on 27/09/14 01:45:
Arthur Marsh wrote on 16/09/14 03
, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Arthur Marsh
arthur.ma...@internode.on.net wrote:
Arthur Marsh wrote on 16/09/14 03:17:
Arthur Marsh wrote, on 14/09/14 21:15:
On 3.16.0 kernels, whether compiled by myself or the stock Debian
kernel, if I have program accessing a file on a CIFS-mounted file system
Arthur Marsh wrote on 16/09/14 03:17:
Arthur Marsh wrote, on 14/09/14 21:15:
On 3.16.0 kernels, whether compiled by myself or the stock Debian
kernel, if I have program accessing a file on a CIFS-mounted file system
(specifically playing an audio file), and restart the samba server
Steve French wrote on 27/09/14 02:02:
cifs mount (default mount options) or mount with SMB2 or SMB3
(vers=2.02 or vers=3.0)?
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Arthur Marsh
arthur.ma...@internode.on.net wrote:
Arthur Marsh wrote on 16/09/14 03:17:
Arthur Marsh wrote, on 14/09/14 21:15
, Steve French smfre...@gmail.com wrote:
cifs mount (default mount options) or mount with SMB2 or SMB3
(vers=2.02 or vers=3.0)?
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Arthur Marsh
arthur.ma...@internode.on.net wrote:
Arthur Marsh wrote on 16/09/14 03:17:
Arthur Marsh wrote, on 14/09/14 21:15
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.14.4-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Attempting to boot linux-image-3.14-1-rt-amd64 on this machine.
Last message displayed before lock-up
Jonathan Nieder wrote, on 15/01/12 11:38:
tags 551393 + moreinfo
quit
Hi Arthur,
Andres Salomon wrote:
Arthur Marsharthur.ma...@internode.on.net wrote:
I attempted to run extremetuxracer on this machine with radeon9200se
and radeon driver and received the following output:
How
Package: linux-tools
Severity: wishlist
I'd like to be able to build a linux-tools package for a kernel
built from git source.
Is that currently possible?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers oldstable
APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500,
maximilian attems wrote, on 10/05/11 04:24:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Arthur Marsh wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39~rc4-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
In both the Debian and kernel.org 2.6.39-rc? kernels, I am experiencing
numerous BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for xxs! errors
maximilian attems wrote, on 02/02/10 00:38:
tags 541656 moreinfo
stop
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Arthur Marsh wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686
Version: 2.6.30-6~snapshot.14108
Severity: normal
When attempting to upgrade I get:
Setting up linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 (2.6.30-6~snapshot
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote, on 2009-12-30 11:51:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 05:59:25PM +0930, Arthur Marsh wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.31-rc5-686
Version: 2.6.31~rc5-1~experimental.1~snapshot.14082
Severity: normal
In recent kernel builds, pcspkr is not included as a compiled module
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.31-1~experimental.2
Severity: normal
I attempted to run extremetuxracer on this machine with radeon9200se and
radeon driver and received the following output:
$ etracer
Extreme TuxRacer SVN Development -- http://www.extremetuxracer.com
(c) 2007 The ETRacer team
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686
Version: 2.6.30-6~snapshot.14108
Severity: normal
When attempting to upgrade I get:
Setting up linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 (2.6.30-6~snapshot.14108) ...
Running depmod.
Running update-initramfs.
Other valid candidates: update-initramfs mkinitrd.yaird
and corruption
From:
Arthur Marsh arthur.ma...@internode.on.net
Date:
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:20:01 +0930
To:
Debian Bug Tracking System sub...@bugs.debian.org
To:
Debian Bug Tracking System sub...@bugs.debian.org
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
I recently purchase a pc with a dual-core AMD64 cpu
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
I recently purchase a pc with a dual-core AMD64 cpu and Asus M3A78 Pro
motherboard.
I experienced very poor disk i/o performance and filesystem corruption when
I enabled the BIOS option ACPI APIC Support, to the extent that an ext3
filesystem had
I should also mention that this disk i/o and filesystem corruption with
ACPI APIC enabled was apparent when using the 2.6.26 kernel but not
necessarily restricted to just that kernel.
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
in the RSDT pointer list.
Regards,
Arthur Marsh.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
maximilian attems wrote, on 2009-04-19 01:31:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Arthur Marsh wrote:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93.2
Severity: normal
I was trying to remove a 2.6.27 kernel I had built from source and somehow the
initrd was removed before initramfs-tools tried to remove
Arthur Marsh wrote, on 2009-04-19 03:39:
Hi, I just went through a kernel bisection to find out why my Asus M3A78
Pro motherboard with dual core AMD64 cpu was only seeing one cpu core on
2.6.29 kernels, but showed and used both cores on earlier kernels such
as 2.6.26. The kernel
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93.2
Severity: normal
I was trying to remove a 2.6.27 kernel I had built from source and somehow the
initrd was removed before initramfs-tools tried to remove it.
This resulted in a failure to remove the kernel from the packaging system.
See also bug
Ben Hutchings wrote, on 10/03/09 14:13:
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 01:56 +1030, Arthur Marsh wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Followup-For: Bug #494009
I couldn't find any files containing ATI firmware at
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/
Are these files available
Package: linux-2.6
Followup-For: Bug #494009
I couldn't find any files containing ATI firmware at
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/
Are these files available anywhere?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Package: linux-source-2.6.28
Version: 2.6.28-1~experimental.1~snapshot.12545
Severity: normal
I copied the kernel config from the most recent 686 binary
to the 2.6.28 source directory, ran make menuconfig only changing
some unrelated cpu options, leaving drivers at default, then make-kpkg
...@kernel.org
To: Arthur Marsh arthur.ma...@internode.on.net,FUJITA Tomonori
fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp,James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com,sta...@kernel.org
Your commit:
[SCSI] eata: fix the data buffer accessors conversion regression
This fixes
02:38:16 +1030
Arthur Marsh arthur.ma...@internode.on.net wrote:
I've recently installed Debian on a PII-266 machine with DPT2044W SCSI
controller.
Kernels 2.6.18-2.6.22 work fine, and kernels 2.6.23-2.6.27 lock up after
loading the eata module using modprobe, with the error:
modprobe exited
FUJITA Tomonori wrote, on 22/12/08 12:39:
Sorry about the problem. Can you try this patch?
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/eata.c b/drivers/scsi/eata.c
index a73a6bb..976cdd5 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/eata.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/eata.c
@@ -1626,8 +1626,15 @@ static void map_dma(unsigned int i,
I've recently installed Debian on a PII-266 machine with DPT2044W SCSI
controller.
Kernels 2.6.18-2.6.22 work fine, and kernels 2.6.23-2.6.27 lock up after
loading the eata module using modprobe, with the error:
modprobe exited with preempt_count 1
I've run a git bisection and have a few
fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
To: arthur.ma...@internode.on.net
CC: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org, ballabio_da...@emc.com
References: 494e69f0.3060...@internode.on.net
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:38:16 +1030
Arthur Marsh arthur.ma...@internode.on.net wrote:
I've recently installed Debian on a PII-266 machine
I've obtained adsl2+ service and re-partitioned my hard disk and have
commenced a git bisection based on:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.23.y.git;a=summary
2.6.23test/.git/refs/bisect$ cat bad good*
4367388f04eea72e78347dc9b299698bf4275f92
Arthur Marsh wrote, on 2008-12-08 19:58:
I'm still trying to get to the source of the bug that prevents me from
using a DPT2044W SCSI card that uses the eata module, and have narrowed
down the working and non-working Debian kernel images to between
linux-image-2.6.22-3-686 version 2.6.22-6
I tried booting kernel 2.6.18-4-686 version 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch2 and
was able to successfully modprobe eata and get the device files created.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arthur Marsh wrote, on 28/11/08 20:33:
The 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch2 kernel allowed me to modprobe eata and I
received similar messages to those quoted above.
The next newest kernel I can download is 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686.
kernel 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686 had problems after modprobe eata
Forwarded from Debian-user:
Original Message
Subject: Re: DPT2044W SCSI adaptor with disk installed but no /dev/sd*
devices created
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:02:35 +1030
From: Arthur Marsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.user
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED
I tried compiling the kernel with scsi and eata built-in and suffered
the same problem.
Error messages I saw included:
note: scsi_scan0[240] exited with preempt_count 1
and the lock-up occurred after the message:
clock source tsc unstable
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
Version: 2.6.26-11~snapshot.12403
Severity: normal
I have a DPT 2044W SCSI adaptor in this machine. Module eata does not
get loaded automatically, and when I try to load it manually with
modprobe I get a
kernel stack trace then lock-up.
lspci -vv
00:0a.0
Package: linux-source-2.6.27
Version: 2.6.27~rc9-1~experimental.1~snapshot.12290
Severity: normal
I tried to build the above source using the .config from
linux-image-2.6.27-rc9-686 but hit errors due to zlib1g-dev not being
installed.
zlib1g-dev isn't recommended or even suggested by the
I've reported this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but
wondered if anyone has experienced any successes or failures in using
framebuffer support with the Cirrus Logic GD 5465 [Laguna] VGA card.
Arthur.
Arthur Marsh wrote, on 2008-08-20 16:23:
I'm running the Linux kernel 2.6.27-rc3. When trying
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
Version: 2.6.25-5
Followup-For: Bug #481525
This sounds like the problem I've had with an MSI cd-rw drive going bad:
Jun 24 09:03:13 victoria kernel: [39238.824892] INFO: task
hald-addon-stor:3675 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Jun 24 09:03:13 victoria
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.91e
Followup-For: Bug #472698
Thanks to the previous poster I was able to recover a system that
wouldn't boot.
My method of recovery was to use the Etch installation CD in
recovergui mode, pick the correct root filesystem, chroot into it and
run aptitude
maximilian attems wrote, on 2008-01-09 06:32:
did you try 2.6.24-rc7 from trunk, see apt lines
- http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
No. I am about to download it and try to compile it with gcc-4.3
please report back on it,
by default we currently use gcc-4.1
Same error:
CC
Bastian Blank wrote, on 09/01/08 21:32:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:40:56AM +1030, Arthur Marsh wrote:
When compiling for Athlon using gcc-4.3:
gcc-4.3 --version
gcc-4.3 (Debian 4.3-20080104-1) 4.3.0 20080104 (experimental) [trunk
revision 131316]
Does Linux upstream already bless gcc 4.3
Package: linux-source-2.6.23
Version: 2.6.23-3~snapshot.10051
Severity: normal
When compiling for Athlon using gcc-4.3:
gcc-4.3 --version
gcc-4.3 (Debian 4.3-20080104-1) 4.3.0 20080104 (experimental) [trunk
revision 131316]
and make-kpkg --initrd linux-image modules-image
compilation
maximilian attems wrote, on 2008-01-09 03:06:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:40:56AM +1030, Arthur Marsh wrote:
Package: linux-source-2.6.23
Version: 2.6.23-3~snapshot.10051
Severity: normal
grrr reportbug-ng misses quite a lot of important info,
thinking of automaticaly dropping such,
please
Package: linux-source-2.6.18
Version: 2.6.18-6
Followup-For: Bug #394974
As I've read in the bug reports, it appears that from time to time
module compatibility breaks with minor version upgrades. In my case when
I tried to load ALSA and realtime-lsm modules compiled against 2.6.18-5
source
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.73d
Severity: important
When installing initramfs-tools I get:
Setting up initramfs-tools (0.73d) ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.17
/usr/sbin/mkinitramfs: line 206: [: /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume:
binary operator expected
I:
Package: linux-image-2.6.17-1-686
Version: 2.6.17-2
Severity: important
Please refer to:
[Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#376382: ALSA MIDI playback
lock-up on kernel 2.6.17-686, not on kernel 2.6.16-2-686
The 2.6.17-1-686 has lockups when I attempt to play MIDI files to a
SoundBlaster Live! 5.1 model
maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 08:51:54PM +0930, Arthur Marsh wrote:
Severity: important
over exagerated.
ok, but is the only thing that has locked up Debian for me (-:
Please refer to:
[Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#376382: ALSA MIDI playback
lock-up on kernel 2.6.17-686
By recompiling and installing the ALSA modules with the
alsa-timer-irqsave-patch available at http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv for
kernel 2.6.17-1-686, I no longer have problems with MIDI playback on my
SoundBlaster Live! 5.1 model 0220 sound card under kernel 2.6.17-1-686.
Regards,
Arthur.
Package: linux-image-2.6.17-1-686
Version: 2.6.17-1
Severity: normal
I still have to manually add
lp
to /etc/modules for /dev/lp0 to be created, even though the parallel
port is detected, previously reported for linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 as
bug #374145.
Regards...
-- System Information:
card, are there any ways to pinpoint
the problem?
Regards,
Arthur Marsh.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686
Version: 2.6.16-14
Followup-For: Bug #374145
After adding the line:
lp
to /etc/modules, a reboot enabled /dev/lp0 to be just after printer
detection:
Jun 18 00:00:54 localhost kernel: parport: PnPBIOS parport detected.
Jun 18 00:00:54 localhost kernel:
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
Version: 2.6.15-1
Followup-For: Bug #345934
I also noted:
-- doing nothing at
/var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.15-1-686.postinst line 579.
The new kernel is installed and usable, but the package remains listed
as partly installed and attempts to complete
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
Version: 2.6.14-5
Followup-For: Bug #343048
Same thing happens here. I also had problems trying to install loop-aes
at the same time as upgrading from 2.6.14-4 to 2.6.14-5. The
installation went ahead if I upgraded the kernel in aptitude first then
the
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-1-686
Version: 2.6.14-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi, I tried to build the realtime-lsm against 2.6.14 and it complained
that it couldn't do so unless CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES was built
into the kernel as a module.
Fix:
CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=m
I'm
fine without realtime).
It's not a big problem, just that I hadn't seen the discussion on the
change to CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES.
Regards,
Arthur.
Sven Luther wrote:
reassign 336561 realtime-lsm
thanks
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 06:32:58PM +1030, Arthur Marsh wrote:
Package: linux-image
Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-386
Version: 2.6.11-2
Severity: normal
/lib/modules/2.6.11-1-386 as installed has the following symbolic link:
source -
/home/dilinger/src/kernel/kernel-image/2.6.11-2/kernel-image-2.6.11-i386-2.6.11/install-386
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT
73 matches
Mail list logo
