On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 05:16:31PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> And in fact this is the solution proposed in #1036049.
And we need to fix that in stable as well.
Not sure if we can safely use Conflicts to make sure we have a suitable
version. At least without the current apt prefering to
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 10:27:26PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> However it does not matter,
> because the include list already is correct:
>
> | #include <...> search starts here:
> | /usr/lib/gcc-cross/s390x-linux-gnu/13/include
&g
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 08:07:47PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 19:30, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 06:28:13PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > > I have implemented example packaging of that as a standalone source
> &g
Hi Dimitri
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 06:28:13PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> I have implemented example packaging of that as a standalone source package
> https://ppa.launchpadcontent.net/xnox/nonvirt/ubuntu/pool/main/l/linux-uapi/
I actually just implemented something similar, but as part o
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 01:04:00PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Sadly in Debian there is no way to make that happen. Think for example
> > about bin-nmu.
> Could you give a complete list of problems?
There are at least those problems:
- Bin-nmu can't change binary package names.
- There is no wa
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 08:43:46AM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > > ## Image packages contains more version info
> > >
> > > Example: linux-image-6.5.3-cloud-arm64
> >
> > > It will not longer be possible to reliably derive the package name from
> > > kernel release (see above), as both va
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 07:59:54AM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I think that's what you mean by the first-level error.
> If not, I'm still confused.
> In the second level error case you are talking about is:
No, the first level is always: but the new kernel does not work.
The second is: I need to u
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 05:54:23PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Or would it be easier to re-use normal dependency resolving, like:
> Kernel-Provides: linux (>> 6.6.1~), linux (<< 6.6.1.)
> This would allow full flexibility and re-uses existing code to check
> such d
[ Removing some lists ]
On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 04:53:33PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > ## Image packages contains more version info
> >
> > Example: linux-image-6.5.3-cloud-arm64
>
> > It will not longer be possible to reliably derive the package name from
> &g
Moin
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 03:01:51PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> ## Kernel modules will be signed with an ephemeral key
This is now
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/607.
> ## Image packages contains more version info
>
> Example: linux-image-6.5.3
Hi
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 06:05:09PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Multiple uploads of the same upstream version will have
> > the same package name, but those rarely happens.
> Those happen fairly often for urgent security updates.
We could encode that in the upstream version. Aka to have
co
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 03:00:53PM -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:54 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > How will the user get the headers matching this previously-used kernel
> > that are required until we provide a kernel with the regression fixed?
The same as now: nowhere, becaus
Hi Andreas
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 11:58:29PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> That should solve the problem where several source packages need to be
> updated together.
The problem does not come from multiple source packages that need to be
updated together. Instead it comes from the way Debian
Hi Sam
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 08:31:57AM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I still think it would help if you would work more on articulating what
> problem you are trying to solve with the linux-headers versioning
> change. I have read multiple versions of this proposal, and your
> follow-ups, and I
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 04:35:08AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 25/09/2023 00.50, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Already built modules remain until someone deletes it. So you can also
> > switch back to the still installed older kernel version and it will have
> > the
Hi Ben
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 06:05:09PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-09-24 at 15:01 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > The same upstream version in testing and backports will have the same
> > package name.
> This is not OK, because they will be incompatibl
Hi Andreas
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:10:36PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 24/09/2023 15.01, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > ## Kernel modules will be signed with an ephemeral key
> >
> > The modules will not longer be signed using the Secure Boot CA like the
> &
Hi folks
Debian currently does Secure Boot signing using a shim chained to the
Microsoft key. This use requires that we follow certain rules. And one
of the recent changes to those rules state that our method of signing
kernel modules also with the same key will not be allowed anymore. Some
inf
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Klaus
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:18:55PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Booting with the new kernel makes the display (1920x1200) heavily
> flckering, diplaying two times the same one above the other and only
> displaying about 1/4 of the screen smashed together on the l
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 01:06:06PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> As far as I understand dpkg's conffile machinery should recognize if
> you changed anything, and leave it in place. Upstream moved the
> default ones to /usr, so we just follow what they do.
Actually using rm_conffile is wrong. This
Hi
On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 11:13:56AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> If we're now reaching the final limit and if it was foreseeable that we
> would reach that limit, then yes it would have made sense to drop armel
> *before* the bookworm release, but alas. If the kernel team can't support
> the kern
.
While the stock driver in 6.1 kind of works, it is not really usable for
end user workloads.
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 01:38:40PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Microsoft asked to backport the jumbo frame support in the Microsoft
> Azure Network Adapter from current master. The changes a
Hi Laurent
On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 11:16:03AM +0200, Laurent BRULET wrote:
> It's still not entirely clear to me, whether this transient issue (where
> linux-
> image-amd64 can be installed while the corresponding linux-headers-amd64
> can't)
> is a "standard case" for backports, or it is an "ex
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:36:47PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> A policy question is that it might be a good idea to rename the packages
> when publishing a regression update for a DSA, that's the only place I see
> where this problem might otherwise reach production systems.
Adding another modifi
On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 09:44:40AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> After a lot of thinking, maybe a solution that allows for incompatible
> package updates without renames would be more useful. Something like:
>
> We uncouple the package names and ABI. The ABI will include the
> c
On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 10:02:16AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> so rebootstrap uses the stage1 build profile which should be building headers
> only. Still it fails with the same error I've reported for a full build:
The stage1 profile is deprecated according to the documentat
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 09:15:50AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Helmut informed me that bugs that break bootstrap (rebootstrap fails to
> cross-build linux-libc-dev because of this bug) are usually filed with serious
> severity, so doing that now. Thanks!
Cross-building linux-
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 08:36:53AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> diff -Nru linux-6.4.11/debian/rules.real linux-6.4.11/debian/rules.real
> --- linux-6.4.11/debian/rules.real 2023-08-17 09:05:43.0 +0200
> +++ linux-6.4.11/debian/rules.real 2023-09-01 06:43:41.00
Control: severity -1 normal
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 09:15:50AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Helmut informed me that bugs that break bootstrap (rebootstrap fails to
> cross-build linux-libc-dev because of this bug) are usually filed with serious
> severity, so doing that now. T
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Dmitry
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 08:10:17PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The linux-libc-dev package provides only a limited set of uAPI headers.
> For example, scsi, drm, video, etc. headers are missing from the
> package.
scsi headers are shipped by libc6-dev, see
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 09:16:15PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Please share your thoughts or if we have a better solution overall.
After a lot of thinking, maybe a solution that allows for incompatible
package updates without renames would be more useful. Something like:
We uncouple
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 04:17:34PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-07-13 at 21:16 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> [...]
> > ## Proposed behaviour
> >
> > This tries to make sure everything apart from experimental gets new
> > names and ABI on every u
Hi
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 11:28:31PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 09:16:15PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > ### NMU
> > Can be easily added back by adding "bX" or so to the ABI.
> That would be confusing, bX is naming convention for binNMUs in
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 11:53:40PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Any objections to me merging these patches? Prefer if they remain
> separate or squash them into a single patch?
Hmm, I have to check, but dpkg-buildflags should already provide this
flag and all the modified locations are for us
Hi folks
You might have heard that the masters of Linux Secure Boot, aka shim
reviewers, have spoken. They have told us that our way of handling
kernel modules is not longer acceptable. For some context see #1040901.
This means for us that we have to make sure that kernel and modules
can't be m
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi
On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 08:41:03PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Please enable building the linux-libc-dev package for the new Debian
> architecture loong64.
> The corresponding kernel architecture is called "loongarch".
I can't find loong64 in the debi
Control: reassign -1 src:linux 6.3.11-1
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 11:31:06AM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > But this is what you want, you want to use the full resolution of the
> > output and scale the output (this is called HiDPI). If you try to
> > change the reso
Control: reassign -1 dkms
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 10:53:19AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2023-07-04 16:13:56 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > This needs to be fixed before linux 6.3.0-2-* can migrate to testing,
> > otherwise it will break dkms module building for everyone still having
>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Klaus
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 06:42:40PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> With this update of linux-image, there is only the highest resolution
> available anymore. As this is 3840x2400, it leaves the screen completely
> unreadable and unusable.
But this is what you want
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 06:35:44PM +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
> /misc /etc/auto.misc
> -nfsvers=3,proto=udp,resvport,retrans=5,rsize=16384,wsize=16384,rw,hard
And if you set it to TCP (the default) or better directly switch to
NFSv4?
> This upstream decisi
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 06:50:10PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This was replaced by hyperv_drm, which provides a standard mode
> > selection output.
> ...although we do still build hyperv_fb for the cloud-amd64 flavour,
> which seems like a mistake.
Because the cloud-amd64 flavour disables DRM
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 03:32:19PM +0200, RSA wrote:
> Hello, I think kernel module hyperv_fb.ko is missing in the package. It was
> present in version 5.10.0-22 before upgrading to debian 12.
>
> $ find /lib/modules/5.10.0-23-amd64 -name hyperv_fb.ko
> /lib/modules/5.10.0-23-amd64/kernel/drivers
Control: forcemerge 1036755 -1
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:40:55AM +0100, Al Sutton wrote:
> Debain 12 has been released with a known bug which causes Android firmware
> builds to
> fail (https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/3/2/797) which makes bookwork unusable for
> the Android
> firmware community.
T
Control: reassign -1 src:linux
Control: severity -1 important
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 05:31:53PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> As a consequence, if cruft *-dkms packages are still installed, but fail
> to build the module for current kernels, this may result in upgrade
> failures. Therefore ple
Source: linux
Version: 6.1.25-1
Severity: important
Microsoft asked to backport the jumbo frame support in the Microsoft
Azure Network Adapter from current master. The changes are not suitable
for stable@ and contained to this one driver.
Commit ids are something like
80f6215b450eb8e92d8b1f117a
Control: tags -1 wontfix
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 08:17:51AM +, Thomas Wouters wrote:
> So I tried to reproduce it with `virt-install` to figure out what's
> going on and could replicate similar behavior: the cloud-init user-data
> is, by default (for x86), provided to the guest as a SATA con
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 05:54:23PM +0100, наб wrote:
> Naturally, it should succeed in every scenario.
This is
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.html#protected-symlinks
Bastian
--
We have found all life forms in the galaxy are capable of superior
development.
Control: tag -1 wontfix
On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 05:54:31PM +, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> e1000 emulation is a default in qemu. It would be nice to have available
> in a cloud kernel. While most of the time one will use virtio, or some
> other cloud specific driver, for troubleshooting images, boo
Control: reassign -1 dkms - breaks kernel installation
Control: severity -1 grave
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 09:36:26AM +0100, Stefano Simonucci wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 6.0.12-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
No, it does not. The kernel is the system an
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 11:44:49AM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> Will the archive team be moving those over? Is it up to firmware packagers
> to re-upload it to the correct component?
AFAIK this requires a re-upload. However, does the installer properly
include it yet? I need to check that.
I
Hi
Our documented, I think, policy is, that we don't support loading new
modules into an old kernel within the same ABI. This forces a reboot
after kernel installation.
However in a lot of cases this just worked. You could update the kernel
package and continue loading most modules.
Now we hav
Control: forcemerge 1023450 -1
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 05:35:06AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> The bullseye-backports 6.0.3 kernel contains an ext4 bug that causes
> the filesystem to become corrupted after resizing the filesystem. See
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg85795.html for
Hi Luca
On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 02:14:54PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 21:29 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > ## Goals
> >
> > - Setup complete boot entries from packaged and generated files
> > - Support dumb file systems for /boot by d
Hi Jörg
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 11:40:46AM +0100, Jörg Behrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 09:29:07PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > ## Prior works
> >
> > [..]
> > - systemd install-kernel: only BLS as target, which nothing used by
> > default in Debia
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 03:37:16AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> l 6.0.0-3-amd64/build 6.0.0-3-amd64/source
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 calestyo calestyo 36 Nov 5 14:41 6.0.0-3-amd64/build ->
> /usr/src/linux-headers-6.0.0-3-amd64
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 calestyo calestyo 37 Nov 5 14:41 6.0.0-3-amd64/sourc
[Cc Ben as he gave feedback to the last iteration, Luca as he wanted
something actionable]
Hi folks
As I abondened the last try and also learned some new things in the
meantime, I'd like to discuss another try at re-organizing how Debian
does boot loaders and initramfs. This mail mostly tries to
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 12:31:18AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Is this going to be backported to bullseye?
First is needs to settle a bit.
But as you can see, in the past we did produce backports:
| firmware-nonfree | 20210818-1~bpo11+1 | bullseye-backports/non-free | source
Bastia
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 11:15:05AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 10:59:30AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > I would like to do some last minute changes to the linux package
> # Drop special case use of rcX as abi name
>
> While having the ability to
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 10:59:30AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I would like to do some last minute changes to the linux package
# Drop special case use of rcX as abi name
While having the ability to distiguish between different RC, it changes
the package names every time.
Bastian
--
E
Hi
I would like to do some last minute changes to the linux package
# Use pristine-lfs
Currently we don't have any way of storing orig tars. I would like to
change that and default to pristine-lfs for that, so we can setup the
build tree without manual work.
# Don't longer list stable changes
[Removed OP]
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 02:46:14PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> This is no bug. The EFI runtime services are explicitly disabled. The
> reason is:
> You can enable it by adding "efi=runtime" to the kernel command line.
I think we should enable that by def
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 11:46:39AM +0200, niek nooijens wrote:
> when Using the normal linux-image 5.10.0-18 I can use efibootmgr to change
> boot variables and /sys/firmware/efi/efivars is populated.
> when using the real-time variant efibootmgr and efivar report "efi variables
> are not support
On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 09:29:10PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> In buster, the metapackages are still built from linux-latest. This
> has a fake build-dependency on linux-headers--all to ensure it
> waits for linux to be built, but it doesn't have any such relation to
> linux-signed-*.
Ah, damn.
On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 06:45:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This will resolve itself automatically once the signed packages are
> available as well (they are in progress of beeing dealt with but needs
> a manual interaction of ftp-masters).
Looks like we need to backport the chan
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 08:05:29PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Isn't that a rather simple security hole for an attacker with local access
> to the system to easily defeat full disk encryption with dm-crypt (in
> combination with booting from a safe USB) and to a certain extent secure b
Hi Lukas
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 05:18:37PM +0200, Lukas Martini wrote:
> I understand the cloud images are supposed to be stripped down images with
> only the bare essentials for cloud operation.
Even more, they are destined for certain environments. OpenStack
technically is not part of that, b
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 09:32:15AM -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> Is there a plan to continue offering new kernels for buster LTS?
Yes, the same as with the older ones. It just is broken right now.
Bastian
--
Lots of people drink from the wrong bottle sometimes.
-- Edith Keeler
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: severity -1 normal
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 07:42:10PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> It seems like there was a regression with the latest stable update
> that affects the autopkgtest for liburing. Reassigning.
Please provide enough information to make isolating t
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 12:09:00PM +0200, Michael wrote:
> i am running virtualbox 6.1.34 from the virtualbox.org repo on a debian 11.3
> host. the guest also runs debian 11.3.
As Virtualbox uses it's own kernel module, we can't provide any help.
You need to ask th
On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 10:34:39PM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> As a further test I tried a different PKCS#11 module:
Could you try the same with "openssl cms"? Just to make sure it's not
sign-file itself.
The complete command line I use to create signatures for kernel modules
is:
| openssl cms -sign
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -1 wontfix
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 09:52:41PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> /proc/sys/kernel/random/poolsize is now 256 instead of 4096 bits,
> which was already small before.
The pool size for an RPNG is only the size of the state, nothing else.
It doe
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 03:47:39AM -0400, Michael Schaller wrote:
> # Associate a loop device with the raw disk image.
> losetup --find "${img}"
This ought to use "--partscan". Otherwise your device is not partioned.
Bastian
--
There's a way out of any cage.
-- Captain Christop
Hi
I will upload linux version 5.17.6-1 to unstable later today. It
includes an ABI bump.
Bastian
--
Extreme feminine beauty is always disturbing.
-- Spock, "The Cloud Minders", stardate 5818.4
Hi Vasudev
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 03:27:26PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> Booting a KVM based VM with UEFI enabled using Buster image with cloud kernel
> will have
> a non working VNC console. Console seems to be frozen on debugging we figured
> out that
> its because buster cloud kernel doe
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 10:40:45AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> (changing configuration options here)
> $ debian/rules orig
> $ debian/rules debian/control
$ debian/rules source
> $ ~/kernel-team/utils/kconfigeditor2/process.py .
Bastian
--
Warp 7 -- It's a law we can live with.
Hi Steve
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:15:22AM +, Steve Capper wrote:
> > Can you please show the ACPI tables provided to the virtual machine?
> > Especially I'm interested in the SPCR table.
> Of course.
> I couldn't see an SPCR, but I did see a DBG2:
Thanks.
> Are you debugging an issue?
No.
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi Steve
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 07:07:39PM +, Steve Capper wrote:
> HyperV guest support has recently landed in the arm64 kernel. Could you
> please enable this in Debian Kernels (5.16+) via the following Kconfig
> options?
I enabled those options, and more, for 5.1
Hi Ben
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 12:29:08AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 11:47 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > - A lot of bootloaders require special filesystems or other settings.
> > Now this more and more clashs with dpkg, as dpkg can't write
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 11:31:21PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> On a plain (with more than two bytes) file, the second poll succeed.
> On /proc/bus/input/devices, the second poll hangs.
> Note: this is an old behavior. I initially observe it on an embeded system
> with
> a 4.1 kernel.
/proc is
Control: tag -1 wontfix
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 12:23:13PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> The Landlock security feature is built in Debian kernel since
> 5.13.12-1~exp1 which is great! However, it is not enough to enable the
> CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK option as described in the related help. The
Hi folks
I'd like to propose some pretty drastic reshaping of the way kernels,
initrd and bootloaders interact with each other and with dpkg.
Traditionaly we install kernel images and configs into /boot. During
installation we generate files in /boot (and housekeeping in /var/lib).
Setup symlink
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 02:51:48PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Do you confirm this is a bug? Do you want I look
> for the first kernel in Debian with this regression?
It is not a bug, this are hardening settings. See documentation about
the protected_regular setting in
https://www.kernel.org/
Control: severity -1 important
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:23:53AM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 5.14.3-1~exp1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
No, it does not. The kernel is the system.
Bastian
Control: notfound -1 linux/5.14.6-2
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 09:29:50PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Currently this regression is blocking the migration of linux and it's
> signed versions to testing [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed
> this bug report against both packages. Can you pleas
Hi
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 11:43:06PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Well I would expect that if I'm running fstrim, the same blocks would not be
> trimmed again (even after reboot) if I'm running the command again
But how would it know that it was already trimmed?
> Here it seems that it's
Hi
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 03:48:11PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > > There is definitely something boggus here
> Yes, just tested it now and it's still happening with the kernel currently
> in unstable (5.10.40-1)
Why do you think this numbers are wrong? "fstrim" initially requests
disc
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 08:43:21PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> Version: 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1
This is not the latest version. 5.10.24 (at least) is in buster-backports.
> [801076.291139] scsi host10: uas
> [801076.291557] scsi 10:0:0:0: Direc
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:30:49PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:39:26AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Where was that discussed?
> It was discussed in
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947759
> , with responses from both Ben and
Hi
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:18:43PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I think I missed or forgot about that change when it happened. I'm not
> super happy about it, to be honest. It's been half-assed in that the
> cloud flavours still have a dependency on an initramfs builder, that
> should be a R
Control: tag -1 wontfix
Hi
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 02:11:06PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> For cloud instances and VMs, it's helpful to be able to use ip=dhcp as a
> minimal network configuration. Enabling this option will do nothing
> unless the kernel command line includes ip=dhcp.
We don't s
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 03:00:06PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> YunQiang Su 于2021年2月20日周六 下午2:19写道：
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/20210220061635.9976-1-yunqiang...@cipunited.com/T/#u
> > This patch for kernel can fix this problem.
> > Let's wait for the reply of kernel upstream community.
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:40:34AM +0100, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> Currently, mounting an EXT4-formatted volume with the case-insensitivity
> feature
> is impossible since CONFIG_UNICODE is not enabled in the kernel configuration.
Why would anyone want to do that?
> My
Control: tags -1 wontfix
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 04:50:05PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> ecryptfs has been silently removed from the 5.10 kernel packages. This
> is not mentioned in the changelog.
Actually it is mentioned:
| * [cloud] Disable some further filesystems. (closes: #977005)
Basti
Moin
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:15:02AM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > Could the mips porters comment on this? Given that we're close to the
> > release
> > of bullseye, I'm not convinced it's a good idea to change this now.
This option is also a dependency of several types of CPU support. So it
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 06:28:16AM -0500, John Scott wrote:
> As discussed on the mailing list(s), I'm looking into making a udeb for
> firmware-ath9k-htc with kernel-wedge.
You missunderstood something. All the firmware stuff is _only_ shipped
as deb, not as udeb.
> To avoid clashing with the o
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:03:00PM +0800, GengYu Rao wrote:
> The kernel missed ec_sys module, as ec_sys.ko.gz in archlinux here:
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ACPI_modules
> Could you please add this module to the kernel package?
What would you need this module
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Charles
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 05:55:47PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> On boot, NetworkManager does its thing correctly, and gets the machine
> on the network. However, I use DHCP with fixed addresses. Getting the
> wrong MAC address throws this off, which is how th
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 help
I disabled the check in 5.10.1-1~exp1. There is no way to make the
kernel fit again without disabling major parts of it.
Downgrading the bug as nothing can be done.
Bastian
--
Lots of people drink from the wrong bottle sometimes.
Moin
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 10:33:55AM +0100, Drexl Johannes wrote:
> which blocks bootup. Disabling the module in modprobe.d via
> install drm_kms_helper /bin/true
> lets the system boot up, but remain in 800x600 px mode. SecureBoot is off,
> System is updated to todays sid; previous kernels di
Control: tag -1 wontfix
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:41:42PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 14:43 +0800, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > Could you please enable CONFIG_F2FS_FS in the cloud kernel?
> What makes you think f2fs will be commonly used in cloud deployments?
Marking it was
101 - 200 of 1912 matches
Mail list logo
