Hey Andrew,
On 2024-05-22 07:44, Andrew Jorgensen wrote:
> For example, we’re going to make an Intel 6300ESB watchdog device
> available, and that needs a driver that’s been in Linux a long time
> but isn’t enabled in the cloud kernel. For that one, another Debian
> user +1’d the request because
.
+ * Apply upstream patch to fix FTBFS on armhf/armel (Closes: #1067829)
+
+ -- Emanuele Rocca Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:56:19 +0100
+
nfs-utils (1:2.6.4-3) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Salvatore Bonaccorso ]
diff -Nru nfs-utils-2.6.4/debian/patches/flushtime-long-long-int.patch nfs-utils-
Hi,
On 2024-01-15 01:14, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Thursday, 21 December 2023 17:30:26 CET Bastian Blank wrote:
> > - All changes need to go via master, which they should do anyway.
>
> I think this as a general rule, with few clearly defined exceptions (like
> stable release updates), would
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 02:29:28PM +0100, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> The file qcom/sc8280xp/LENOVO/21BX/audioreach-tplg.bin and its symlink
> qcom/sc8280xp/SC8280XP-LENOVO-X13S-tplg.bin are needed by the Lenovo
> Thinkpad X13s. Please consider adding them to firmware-qcom-soc.
>
Hi Bastian,
On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 11:07:48PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Do we have any armel subarch that can be installed via d-i?
Not as far as I know, perhaps Sledge has more info on this? Also, I don't think
we've seen anyone mentioning armel in ages on debian-boot, both in terms of
Hi,
On 2023-12-04 03:10, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The D and W flags mean there were prior BUG and WARN errors logged.
> Please send those as well.
Here is the very first warning:
Nov 30 17:16:45 ci-worker-armhf-03 kernel: WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 1592 at
fs/dcache.c:365 dentry_free+0x98/0xd0
Hi John,
On 2023-12-04 09:48, John Vincent wrote:
> I tested today's daily installer (2023-12-04 10:14) but the changes
> are seeming to be not included in this installer.
Indeed, 6.6.3-1~exp1 is in experimental. The changes will be included in
the daily installer build once the relevant kernel
Package: firmware-qcom-soc
Version: 20230515-3
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
The file qcom/sc8280xp/LENOVO/21BX/audioreach-tplg.bin and its symlink
qcom/sc8280xp/SC8280XP-LENOVO-X13S-tplg.bin are needed by the Lenovo
Thinkpad X13s. Please consider adding them to firmware-qcom-soc.
File:
Package: firmware-atheros
Version: 20230515-3
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
The files qca/hpbtfw21.tlv and qca/hpnv21.bin are needed by the Lenovo
Thinkpad X13s. Please consider adding them to firmware-atheros.
Thanks,
Emanuele
Hi Salvatore,
On 2023-11-04 09:57, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> I'm not sure this is really that urgent, 6.5.10 will be EOL upstream
> at some point and in master branch Bastian et all are prearing the 6.6
> based once. After an extra round in experimental I would expect it
> will now not take
Hi!
On 2023-10-05 10:05, John wrote:
> CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G054=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G043=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_R9A09G011=y
The changes have been merged into master some time ago already:
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/867
Salvatore: what is the best way to ensure this makes
Hi Dmitry!
On 2023-10-31 02:17, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> BTW, Emanuele, are you by chance responsible for the X13s wiki page?
I started it, but most of the useful content has been provided by
someone else. :-)
See https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/Thinkpad/X13s?action=info
> There
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 07:54:25PM +0100, Vincent Blut wrote:
> Le 2023-10-30 20:30, Dmitry Baryshkov a écrit :
> > Package: src:linux
> > Version: 6.5.8-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Please enable the following options as modules to enable audio support
> > on Lenovo X13s platform:
> >
>
Hi Uwe,
On 2023-10-24 06:48, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> I hesitate to actually enable it because I don't understand PCI good
> enough to judge it's a safe choice for the Debian kernel.
I am also not familiar with the details, but I see that PCI_P2PDMA is
'y' on both Fedora Server 38 and openSUSE
Hi,
On 2023-10-08 06:20, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> I'm wondering whether it'd make sense for the Debian kernel to be built with
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y.
On amd64 we already have PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y, so I thought of running some
benchmarks on my Ryzen system to evaluate the
Hi Diederik,
On 2023-10-10 01:54, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 October 2023 12:10:07 CEST Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> > CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC is set to 'y' by default on amd64 due to
> > HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_CALL being 'y', see:
> > https://sources.debian.org/src
Hello Johannes,
On 2023-10-10 12:14, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> Quoting Emanuele Rocca (2023-10-10 12:10:07)
> > Setting CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y on arm64 is likely safe for us too,
> > but
> > we may want to run some benchmark first to see if the
Hi,
On 2023-10-08 07:17, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> $ grep PREEMPT_DYNAMIC /boot/config-6.5.0-1-amd64
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y
> CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y
> CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_CALL=y
[...]
> $ grep PREEMPT_DYNAMIC /boot/config-6.1.0-13-arm64
> # CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC is not set
Hi,
On 2023-08-14 01:16, John Vincent wrote:
> The RZ/G2L SMARC is the reference board for the Renesas RZ/G2L MPU:
> https://renesas.info/wiki/RZ-G/RZ-G2L_SMARC
>
> I think the following few configuration options in
> debian/config/arm64/config are missing to run Debian on this board.
>
> For
Hi Salvatore,
On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 06:13:22PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> With the planned release date for 2023-06-10 and dates around that as
> announced by the release time it's time to clarify some last work for
> src:linux to be targeted for bookworm.
[...]
> Additionally to
Hi Vincent,
On 2023-03-20 01:36, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
> I think the Debian kernel is missing only a few configuration options in
> debian/config/arm64/config to run on that board.
Merge request opened:
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/712
Emanuele
Hello Bastian,
* Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2007-07-08 17:50 +0200]:
I'd like to schedule 2.6.21-6 for tuesday. It only contains a security
fix.
I guess there's something I don't understand in the patching process...
dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/patches/series/6 should be the file
Hey max,
* maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2007-06-21 12:02 +0200]:
On Mon, 28 May 2007, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
Trying to boot with this initrd the kernel is not able to find the
firmware for my qla2xxx, although a diff -Nur between the contents of
the following two images yields
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.88
Severity: important
Hi,
there seems to be something wrong with recent changes to hook-functions.
With initramfs-tools 0.88:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# LANG=C dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-2.6.22-rc3
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Using
Hello Thomas,
* Thomas Köllmann [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2006-12-17 22:43 +0100]:
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:01:07 -0800
Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't remember anyone reporting problems with xorg on these
machines, it would be very valuable information if you could try it
Hi Etienne,
* Kolargol double zero [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2007-04-24 22:07 +0200]:
I still get the same freeze with fbcon=map:1. But with video=atyfb:off the
system boots. :)
OK. Can you log in via ssh booting without atyfb:off?
It would be interesting to take a look to what you have in
* Kolargol double zero [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2007-04-23 15:50 +0200]:
After upgrading a SunBlade 100 from Sarge to Etch, the 2.6.18 kernel fails
to boot after SILO loaded it. The screen shows:
Remapping the kernel... done.
Booting Linux...
Try passing fbcon=map:1 (or video=atyfb:off) to
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-vserver-sparc64
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12
Severity: normal
The following errors appear at boot time or running vserver-stat:
Apr 8 20:56:22 aurora kernel: Kernel unaligned access at TPC[4b72b0]
filldir64+0x54/0x134
Apr 8 20:56:22 aurora kernel: Kernel unaligned
tag 414877 pending
thanks
Hello Joerg,
* Joerg Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2007-03-14 13:29 +0100]:
please apply this patch:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.20.y.git;a=commit;h=ede6d26177a046ab7f14840e10cb2bbda6bc91df
Your patch has been already applied:
Hello Peter,
* Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2007-03-01 0:53 +0100]:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sparc/7178
Please check if it fixes the problem.
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner. RL and everything
Hello,
* Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2007-02-20 18:18 +0100]:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007, Richard Mortimer wrote:
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[5e4420] ip_rcv+0xd0/0x58c
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[517f84] ip_fast_csum+0xc/0x80
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[517f88]
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-sparc64
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The eth1394 module is affected by an unaligned access problem:
$ dmesg |grep unaligned
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[101940c8] ether1394_reset_priv+0x2c/0xb8
[eth1394]
This problem is fixed in Linux
Hello,
* Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2007-02-20 18:18 +0100]:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007, Richard Mortimer wrote:
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[5e4420] ip_rcv+0xd0/0x58c
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[517f84] ip_fast_csum+0xc/0x80
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[517f88]
33 matches
Mail list logo
