On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 07:14:48PM +0100, Alex Constantino wrote:
> This reverts commit 5a838e5d5825c85556011478abde708251cc0776.
>
> Changes from commit 5a838e5d5825 ("drm/qxl: simplify qxl_fence_wait") would
> result in a '[TTM] Buffer eviction failed' exception whenever it reached a
> timeout.
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 08:00:16AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On June 9, 2023 3:42:12 PM PDT, Frank Reppin wrote:
> >Dear all,
> >
> >I've already followed the reply instructions on LKML - but it somewhat
> >messed up my message there (so probably nobody knows what I'm talking about)
> >- however
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 03:13:24PM +0100, Sumanth Korikkar wrote:
> No upstream commit exists: the problem addressed here is that
> 'commit 75309018a24d ("s390: add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL")'
> was backported to 5.10. This commit is broken, but nobody noticed
> upstream, since shortly
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:35:24PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:23:20PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:04:12PM +0100, Sumanth Korikkar wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This patch fixes the issue for s3
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:04:12PM +0100, Sumanth Korikkar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch fixes the issue for s390 stable kernel starting 5.10.162.
> The issue was specifically seen after stable version 5.10.162:
> Following commits can trigger it:
> 1. stable commit id - 788d0824269b ("io_uring:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:04:13PM +0100, Sumanth Korikkar wrote:
> No upstream commit exists.
Why not? Please explain how this was fixed in Linus's tree and why we
can't take the same change here as well.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 06:20:30PM +, Fujinaka, Todd wrote:
> I think I accidentally deleted the forward from the intel-wired-lan spam
> filter. Re-forwarding and adding Alex's gmail address.
>
> Also,
>
> Todd Fujinaka
> Software Application Engineer
> Data Center Group
> Intel
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 08:18:53PM +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I request the following patch from v4.10-rc1 to get cherry-picked into
> "stable/linux-4.9.y":
>
> > commit f114dca2533ca770aebebffb5ed56e5e7d1fb3fb
> > Author: Alexander Duyck
> > Date: Tue Oct 25 16:08:46 2016 -0700
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 03:27:28PM +0200, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> El 02/09/20 a las 14:05, Greg KH escribió:
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 01:47:18PM +0200, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > > El 30/07/20 a las 16:07, Oliver Neukum escribió:
> > > > Am Donnersta
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 01:47:18PM +0200, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> El 30/07/20 a las 16:07, Oliver Neukum escribió:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 30.07.2020, 15:53 +0200 schrieb Santiago Ruano
> > Rincón:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Miguel Rodríguez sent this set of patches two years ago to fix the lack
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:35:58PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm the maintainer in Debian for strace. Trying to reproduce
> https://bugs.debian.org/963462 on my machine (Thinkpad T470), I've
> found a repeatable hard lockup running the strace testsuite. Each time
> it seems to
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 04:34:15PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 22:42 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Masahiro Yamada's on August 27, 2019 8:49 pm:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 6:59 PM Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > > Nick Desaulniers's on August 27, 2019
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 04:36:38PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hello Greg,
>
> On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 12:26 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 03:46:57PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > > The current code fails to run on amd64 because of h
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 03:46:57PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Dear Stable Team,
> Request for inclusion into the stable branches of Linux. This change
> went into 4.20 but 4.19 is the LTS release that many of the Linux
> Vendors are rebasing on. Hence, it'd be nice to see this part of the
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 02:05:42PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Jan, hi Greg,
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 01:58:06PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > commit 310ca162d77 "block/loop: Use global lock for ioctl() operation." has
> > been pushed to multiple stable trees. This
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 08:42:38PM +0100, Loic wrote:
> Le 2018-12-17 09:19, Greg KH a écrit :
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 09:08:20PM +0100, Loic wrote:
> > > Le 2018-12-16 20:27, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
> > > > On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 09:52:33 +0100
> > > >
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 10:53:20AM -0500, Tomasz Janowski wrote:
> On Thursday, February 8, 2018 3:43:05 PM EST Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 02:16:08PM +, Tomasz Janowski, Ph.D. wrote:
> > > Dear USB developers,
> > >
> > > Based on my googl
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 02:16:08PM +, Tomasz Janowski, Ph.D. wrote:
> Dear USB developers,
>
> Based on my google research, the problem I experience seems to happen
> with some newer smartphones. My test case is Samsung Galaxy S8 (SM-950U1). I
> am
> trying to use USB tethering and
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 05:45:06PM +0100, Wolfgang Schnitker wrote:
> Dear serial developers,
>
> my suggestion is now following:
>
> My box has 3 physical serial IO ports, 1 on MB and 2 on PCI IO board.
>
> dmesg | grep ttyS shows this:
>
> (rmmod parport_serial and modprobe it again)
>
> [
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 11:03:46AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 08:53:07AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 09:44:24AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > > Since upgrading to kernel version from 4.1.x to 4.2.1 on Debian tes
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 09:44:24AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi linux-usb list,
>
> Since upgrading to kernel version from 4.1.x to 4.2.1 on Debian testing I am
> getting on my PC the following usbserial module init failure when connecting
> my PC to the i.MX6 SabreSD FTDI USB/serial
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 07:00:32PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Commit 355a901e6cf1 (tcp: make connect() mem charging friendly)
changed tcp_send_syn_data() to perform an open-coded copy of the 'syn'
skb rather than using skb_copy_expand().
The open-coded copy does not cover the
maintained on our infrastructure.
The team will pick up stable maintenance where Greg KH left off with
v3.16.7 [1]. Thank you, Greg.
In addition to the Ubuntu 14.10 Utopic Unicorn release, the Debian 8
Jessie release will also be based on this kernel [2]. Since the
regular support
maintenance where Greg KH left off with
v3.16.7 [1]. Thank you, Greg.
In addition to the Ubuntu 14.10 Utopic Unicorn release, the Debian 8
Jessie release will also be based on this kernel [2]. Since the
regular support for Jessie will go beyond April 2016, after this
date Ben Hutchings
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:21:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 20:36 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Control: tag -1 security upstream patch moreinfo
Control: severity -1 grave
Control: found -1 3.14.5-1
Aurelien Jarno pointed out this appears to be fixed upstream in
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 02:03:23PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:21:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 20:36 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Control: tag -1 security upstream patch moreinfo
Control: severity -1 grave
Control: found -1 3.14.5-1
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:10:59PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 14:05 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 02:03:23PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:21:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 20:36 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:32:33AM +0100, Karsten Malcher wrote:
Hello Greg,
Am 14.12.2013 18:08, schrieb Greg KH:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 04:06:35PM +0100, Karsten Malcher wrote:
Hello together,
is there anything new for the PL-2303 HX?
It would be fine if it could work like
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 04:06:35PM +0100, Karsten Malcher wrote:
Hello together,
is there anything new for the PL-2303 HX?
It would be fine if it could work like in the past.
Have you tried a newer kernel in a while? A number of things have been
hopefully fixed since June when you last
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 02:13:36PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
Hi Stable maintainers,
I am the proud owner of a new Supermicro server mainboard that uses
an LGA1150 socket and supports the new Intel Haswell CPUs that just
started shipping at the beginning of June. The board has two
built-in
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:41:07AM +0200, Karsten Malcher wrote:
Hello Greg,
have you buyed one of this jinxed PL-2303 HX adapters?
No, I have not been able to find one. Does anyone know where I can
purchase one?
Yesterday i got this interesting mail from Aric, who has analyzed a
similar
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:41:38PM +0200, Karsten Malcher wrote:
Hello Greg,
Am 24.06.2013 18:17, schrieb Greg KH:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:41:07AM +0200, Karsten Malcher wrote:
Hello Greg,
have you buyed one of this jinxed PL-2303 HX adapters?
No, I have not been able to find one
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 08:37:59PM +0200, Karsten Malcher wrote:
Am 24.06.2013 20:18, schrieb Greg KH:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:41:38PM +0200, Karsten Malcher wrote:
Hello Greg,
Am 24.06.2013 18:17, schrieb Greg KH:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:41:07AM +0200, Karsten Malcher wrote:
Hello
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:38:17PM -0400, Aric Fedida wrote:
I will gladly ship you one. Give me address details, and I'll go to
the post office to send it.
I'll send it off-list, thanks.
Personally, I have resolved to abandon the PL2303 chip, and move to
FTDI instead. But for the sake of
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 11:56:43PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
so there's a lot of factors which i believe the linux kernel
developers are not aware of, and haven't taken into account, and to
place blame onto the SoC vendors for not working with *you* when *you*
haven't made an
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 04:20:20AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
This is a shorter (and more appropriate for stable kernels) analog to
the following upstream commit:
commit 6926afd1925a54a13684ebe05987868890665e2b
Author: Trond Myklebust trond.mykleb...@netapp.com
Date: Sat Jan 7 13:22:46
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:22:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
Hi,
I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug[1] on RHEL and also on
Debian.
I've noticed Fedora has started to ship an update with two patches
that reduce the footprint of the nfs4 id mapper which should prevent
this (or
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:04:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
Hi,
I'm experiencing the bug described in the Debian[1] and Red Hat[2] bug
tracker.
This bug seems to have been fixed in the 3.3 kernel with your commit
6926afd1925a54a13684ebe05987868890665e2b:
From: Trond Myklebust
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 05:38:46PM +0100, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
Hi there,
this is a re-report because not everyone loves Bugzilla.
tl;dr: Because of a conflict on a TTY lock, opening the builtin USB 3G
modem of the EeePC 1005HAG takes up to 10s.
Previously reported as:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 06:35:43PM +0100, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 18:07, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 05:38:46PM +0100, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
I don't see any long delay in your kernel log messages.
The problem isn't visible in dmesg AFAIK. I
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
commit 9ec84acee1e221d99dc33237bff5e82839d10cc0 upstream.
We do want to allow lock debugging for GPL-compatible modules
that are not (yet) built in-tree.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:46:02AM -0500, Pete Graner wrote:
On 01/30/2012 02:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:46:29AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Greg,
We've decided to go with Linux 3.2 for the next Debian stable release,
so we'll be interested in a 3.2.y longterm series
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:46:29AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Greg,
We've decided to go with Linux 3.2 for the next Debian stable release,
so we'll be interested in a 3.2.y longterm series. I believe there was
a volunteer from Ubuntu to look after that once you've had enough of it,
but I
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 11:53:45PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 23:27 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 21:16 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
[...]
• work and fail
This is for debian-68k, linux-68k and debian-kernel:
ARAnyM “console” output
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:58:43PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
reassign 650119 src:linux-2.6 3.1.1-1
severity 650119 important
# 6225da481597 (cciss: Add IRQF_SHARED back in for the non-MSI(X)
# interrupt handler, 2011-11-28), which is part of Jens Axboe's
# block/for-next tree.
tags
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:13:52PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:58:43PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Stephen, once it hits mainline, would 6225da481597 be a candidate for
the current-maintained stable trees = 2.6.36, or does it have any
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 07:04:39AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
We should provide topology information to userland even if it's not
very interesting. The current code appears to work properly for !SMP
(tested on i386).
Why, what will the topology look like for this?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:41:37AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:08:34 -0400, Nick Bowler nbow...@elliptictech.com
wrote:
On 2011-10-25 22:54 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:17:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:04:55PM +0200
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:51:42PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
On 2011-10-25 18:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:38 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
This patch prevents the use of lockdep for debugging out of tree
modules, which is rather mean.
It was already disabled
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:17:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:04:55PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:51:42PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
On 2011-10-25 18:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:38 -0400, Nick Bowler
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 07:57:09AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Version: 3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Mario wrote:
Version: 2.6.32-29
[...]
[7.808651] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for :00:02.0 on
minor 0
[ 16.409864]
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:33:18AM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
Hi,
there's a bug in the parport module that have been reported (in another
places) some time ago [1]. Also, this bug was reported at Redhat [2], but
nobody follow the report and it was closed.
As Adam baked said
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:41:14PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
Hi again,
sorry for the noise and my mistake. The patch...
there's a bug in the parport module that have been reported (in another
places) some time ago [1]. Also, this bug was reported at Redhat [2], but
nobody
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:20:37PM -0700, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
Do they need help from the community
instead to help define, implement, and maintain this for them?
I think the answer is yes.
to expand on this a bit.
it's a lot easier to
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:33:56PM +0200, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
On Aug 17, 2011, at 00:33, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:26:24PM +0200, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
I'd like to echo Ben's sentiment, particularly in the area of automotive.
A car has to be supported with parts
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:26:24PM +0200, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
I'd like to echo Ben's sentiment, particularly in the area of automotive.
A car has to be supported with parts for at least ten years, often longer,
and this includes the build system for the infotainment software.
The
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:09:02AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I see that you've accepted Willy Tarreau's offer to take over 2.6.32.y,
so if you could just formalise that before /. goes wild over the looming
end of all the above distributions, that would be nice. :-)
The distros were doing
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 02:27:09PM +0100, Andy Botting wrote:
Please do.
I applied the patch to the 2.6.32 kernel by hand, and it loaded and
detected the trackpad, but didn't seem to work.
There were plenty of other issues with this machine, due to the lack
of support for the new
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:45:09AM +0100, Andy Botting wrote:
Andy has the hardware, or at least had access to the hardware back
then. I have the hardware too now, but I don't have time to run the
tests.
This patch is fairly trivial - but I can test it some time in the next
few days if
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:48:42AM +0200, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
commit 4d4cf23cdde2f8f9324f5684a7f349e182039529 upstream.
This patch add multitouch support for the MacBookPro8,1 and
MacBookPro8,2 models.
Signed-off-by: Andy Botting a...@andybotting.com
Signed-off-by: Henrik Rydberg
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:14:36PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Rik Theys wrote:
On 04/15/2011 05:49 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Please consider adding this patch to a ((old)stable) kernel update.
I don't think this is sufficiently critical for an oldstable update.
For stable, yes,
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 09:10:19AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 23:09:50 -0400 (EDT), Jonathan Nieder wrote:
If you run git log dd30ac3 --grep='dasd: correct device table', then
the fix will show up:
commit 5da24b7627ff821e154a3aaecd5d60e1d8e228a5
Author:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:28:22PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Could you check back with Joe Conway and ask for commits IDs of the
upstream fixes?
I've got the following info from Trond Myklebust:
The upstream fix is commit 27dc1cd3ad9300f81e1219e5fc305d91d85353f8
(NFS:
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Kamalesh Babulal kamal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
powerpc/kexec: Add ifdef CONFIG_PPC_STD_MMU_64 to PPC64 code
This patch introduces PPC64 specific #ifdef bits from the upstream
commit:
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Kamalesh Babulal kamal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
powerpc: Fix default_machine_crash_shutdown #ifdef botch
Commit: c2be05481f6125254c45b78f334d4dd09c701c82 upstream
crash_kexec_wait_realmode()
2.6.33-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Kamalesh Babulal kamal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
powerpc/kexec: Add ifdef CONFIG_PPC_STD_MMU_64 to PPC64 code
This patch introduces PPC64 specific #ifdef bits from the upstream
commit:
2.6.33-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Kamalesh Babulal kamal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
powerpc: Fix default_machine_crash_shutdown #ifdef botch
Commit: c2be05481f6125254c45b78f334d4dd09c701c82 upstream
crash_kexec_wait_realmode()
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 06:28:49PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Hi Greg,
Can you please pull the powerpc build failure fixes
patch series into 2.6.32-stable.
No, I don't pull any patches into a stable tree. Especially as you
didn't even give me a git tree to pull from :)
I'll take
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:21:33PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
* dann frazier da...@dannf.org [2011-04-04 15:57:55]:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 01:21:03PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
* dann frazier da...@dannf.org [2011-04-02 11:23:03]:
2.6.32.36 also fails to build on
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 08:41:50PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
* Greg KH g...@kroah.com [2011-04-05 07:08:30]:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:21:33PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
* dann frazier da...@dannf.org [2011-04-04 15:57:55]:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 01:21:03PM +0530
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:56:52PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Resending the patch with commit id and message included. Please let
me know, incase the patch needs any other changes to be made.
What is the proper Subject: of this patch?
powerpc: Fix
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 06:03:59PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
hey Greg,
Apologies if you've already been notifed of this, but the
radio-aimslab fix in 2.6.32.29 introduces a build failures. Looks like
we also need to grab:
commit 2400982a2e8a8e4e95f0a0e1517bbe63cc88038f
Author: Geert
2.6.36-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
commit 551423748a4eba55f2eb0fc250d757986471f187 upstream.
The error message 'NMI watchdog failed to create perf event...'
does not make it clear that this
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:44:28PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Recent review has revealed several bugs in econet and other obscure
protocol implementations that can be exploited by local users for
denial of service or privilege escalation.
The econet protocol (PF_ECONET) is unmaintained.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 05:26:44PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Greg KH gre...@suse.de
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:21:35 -0800
And I need an ack from the networking maintainer to be able to accept
this also.
I'm not applying this, nor do I want anyone else to.
If people think
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 03:52:28AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Recent review has revealed several bugs in obscure protocol
implementations that can be exploited by local users for denial of
service or privilege escalation.
The econet protocol (PF_ECONET) is unmaintained. There appear to be
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
This was fixed in mainline by the interface change made in commit
f9dcbcc9e338d08c0f7de7eba4eaafbbb7f81249.
After walking the multicast list to set up the
2.6.27-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
This was fixed in mainline by the interface change made in commit
f9dcbcc9e338d08c0f7de7eba4eaafbbb7f81249.
After walking the multicast list to set up the
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 08:13:27PM +0100, Jack Stone wrote:
On 22/10/2010 19:39, Greg KH wrote:
drivers/net/r6040.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/drivers/net/r6040.c
+++ b/drivers/net/r6040.c
@@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ static void r6040_multicast_list(struct
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
commit 8faf2e6c201d95b780cd3b4674b7a55ede6dcbbb upstream.
Several MIPS platforms don't set pci_controller::io_map_base for their
PCI bridges. This results
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
This applies to 2.6.32 *only*. It has not been applied upstream since
the limitation no longer exists.
Prior to Linux 2.6.35, net devices outside the initial net namespace
did not have sysfs directories. Attempting to add attributes to
them will trigger
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 05:21:16AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Prior to Linux 2.6.35, net devices outside the initial net namespace
did not have sysfs directories. Attempting to add attributes to
them will trigger a BUG().
Reported-and-tested-by: Russell Stuart russell-deb...@stuart.id.au
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
Am Montag, den 30.08.2010, 10:21 -0700 schrieb Greg KH:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 09:46:36AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Greg KH g...@kroah.com
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:50:17 -0700
As I stated above, I need the ACK
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 03:59:57PM +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 09:32 +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
Hi,
I was finally able to identify the patch series that introduced the fix
(they were introduced to -stable in 2.6.33.2):
cb63112 net: add __must_check to
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 09:46:36AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Greg KH g...@kroah.com
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:50:17 -0700
As I stated above, I need the ACK from David to be able to add these
patches.
David?
I believe there were some regressions caused by these changes
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 09:37:34AM +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
Hi Ben, Greg,
I was finally able to identify the patch series that introduced the fix
(they were introduced to -stable in 2.6.33.2):
cb63112 net: add __must_check to sk_add_backlog
a12a9a2 net: backlog functions rename
51c5db4
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 01:48:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 09:55:47AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 06:47:05AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 03:47:05PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 06:30:21PM +0200
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 06:47:05AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 03:47:05PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 06:30:21PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
This was commit 2f26afba46f0ebf155cf9be746496a0304a5b7cf.
now queued up.
Whoops, sorry. I mixed
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 06:30:21PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
This was commit 2f26afba46f0ebf155cf9be746496a0304a5b7cf.
now queued up.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:00:35AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
The rtl8192s_usb driver was claiming a number of device IDs which are
actually supported by the code in the rtl8192u_usb driver. Remove
them from rtl8192s_usb, and add more device IDs as listed in the
vendor driver version
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:36:20AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
Hi Greg,
Pinging for a revert request for 2.6.32.x. It seems like we had a
misunderstanding about exactly which patches should be reverted. The email
below
explains precisely which commits should be reverted from the
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:18:58PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk) wrote:
These commits included in 2.6.32.12:
ea0a09acd81c6d52c77d80f0d4089795df7bcb58 modules: fix incorrect percpu
usage
d150a2b96558a7349cbf3a72a279c37bc67d50fb module: fix
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 05:32:33PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:41:34AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:36:20AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
Hi Greg,
Pinging for a revert request for 2.6.32.x. It seems like we had a
misunderstanding
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:27:56PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-11
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
hi,
when SATA drives are attached to SAS controllers and used in ATA
pass-through mode, many operations cause alarming
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Alexey Starikovskiy astarikovs...@suse.de
commit dadf28a10c3eb29421837a2e413ab869ebd upstream
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14667
[bwh: Backport to 2.6.32; same applies to
2.6.33-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Alexey Starikovskiy astarikovs...@suse.de
commit dadf28a10c3eb29421837a2e413ab869ebd upstream
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14667
[bwh: Backport to 2.6.32; same applies to
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:59:16PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Greg KH wrote:
From: Alexey Starikovskiy astarikovs...@suse.de
commit dadf28a10c3eb29421837a2e413ab869ebd upstream
Hmm. Doesn't this need commit 2060c44576c79086ff24718878d7edaa7384a985
to fix
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
John Halton wrote in http://bugs.debian.org/575726:
Whenever wpa_supplicant is deactivated (whether by killing the process or
during a normal shutdown) I
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:10:52PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 14:03 +1100, Geoff Simmons wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:19:29AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I'm sorry but I can't find the firmware for this anywhere.
It is available in Greg Kroah-Hartman's
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 05:29:42PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:53:57PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
go reading /proc/acpi/ibm/video every
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
