Hi!
On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 12:12:06 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: fixed -1 5.10.162-1 6.1.8-1
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2022 21:35:58 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 07:42:10PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > It seems like there was a regression w
Control: reassign -1 linux
Control: affects -1 liburing debci
Hi!
It seems like there was a regression with the latest stable update
that affects the autopkgtest for liburing. Reassigning.
On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 21:07:28 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: liburing
> Version: 2.1-2
> Severity:
Package: linux-perf
Version: 5.16.3-1~exp1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This package has code in its postrm maintscript, which unconditionally
removes the diversion, which breaks as the rename cannot be performed
due to linux-base owning the file, and dpkg-divert refusing to
overwrite it. This is the
Control: reassign -1 dpkg-dev
Control: retitle -1 dpkg-source: Considers missing symlink targets directory
traversals
Control: found -1 1.20.0
On Sat, 2020-07-04 at 01:20:18 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Source: dpkg,firmware-nonfree
> Version: 20190717-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
Source: nfs-utils
Source-Version: 1:1.3.4-2.5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi!
The attached patch fixes the LSB init script to have more consistent
output.
Thanks,
Guillem
From b6e07cae38198643828a4e4008eda6edd25d9be0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillem Jover
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 00:07
Hi!
On Sat, 2016-10-01 at 21:07:30 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 02:08 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 13:39:30 +0100, James Clarke wrote:
> > > Package: libdpkg-perl
> > > Version: 1.18.10
> > > Control: affects -1
Control: reassign -1 src:linux
On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 13:39:30 +0100, James Clarke wrote:
> Package: libdpkg-perl
> Version: 1.18.10
> Control: affects -1 src:linux
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
> User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: sparc64
> Currently, src:linux FTBFS
Control: reassign -1 linux
Control: affects -1 dpkg
Hi!
[ Reassigning to linux, where this can be fixed. Upstream has provided
a preliminary patch to this bug report, which might need testing and
perhaps some polishing? Trimmed irrelevant information. ]
On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 12:16:10 -0300,
Hi!
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 17:43:33 -0400, Paul Kimoto wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.15
My kernel is the wheezy backport 3.16.3-2~bpo70+1
(linux-image-3.16-0.bpo.2-486).
I tried to update rsyslog from 5.8.11-3 to 5.8.11-3+deb7u1 this morning
(Oct 1). Aptitude told me first that
Hi!
On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 22:42:11 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have
long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors
and now require a minimum of a 486-class processor.
I think it is time to increase
Hi Ted!
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 23:11:52 -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
I did some experimenting, and I figured out what was going on. You're
right, (c) doesn't quite work, because delayed allocation meant that
the writeout didn't take place until the fsync() for each file
happened. I didn't see this
Hi!
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 16:52:54 -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 03:53:27PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Just to sum up what dpkg --unpack does in 1.15.8.6:
1/ set the package status as half-installed/reinst-required
2/ extract all the new files as *.dpkg-new
3/ for all
Hi!
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 19:31:00 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:58:47AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
All this is with a standard squeeze kernel on an otherwise idle system.
It should be noted that with lots of other disk activity such as writing
to USB disks, the
Hi!
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:48:20 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
0. The arguments given to all kernel hook scripts are the kernel ABI
version (the string that uname -r reports) and, optionally, the absolute
path to the kernel image. If the second argument is missing then the
path is either
Hi!
So while this was presented as a draft for Linux kernels, it touches
interfaces shared with other kernels, so I think it would be nice to
try to get it to be kernel agnostic, CCing debian-bsd@ and debian-hurd@
just for that. The complete draft can be found in debian-ker...@.
A bit of
reassign 462677 linux-2.6
found 462677 2.6.22-6
thanks
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 08:06:56 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 13:20:38 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Guillem Jover writes:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 23:11:32 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 10
16 matches
Mail list logo
