On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:33:51AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
How about we start cutting down on the options and start saying a Linux
system will provide feature x and y - always
Stuff like (and I'm just pulling random stuff out here) - ASLR, seccomp,
250HZ minimum etc etc.. We could cut
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 03:14:07PM +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
How about this then libimobiledevice-utils supplying the udev rule
and pairing utility, and providing a virtual package which Provides:
ipheth-support? Maybe the provides bit is not required...
Why can't ipheth just depend on
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 06:39:46PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Olivier Galibert galib...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi,
Why can't ipheth just depend on libimobiledevice-utils ? It *is* a
functional dependency after all, even if they're not communicating
directly with each other.
The ipheth
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:17:15AM +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
Le jeudi 07 avril 2005 à 10:04 +0200, David Schmitt a écrit :
Then I would like to exercise my right under the GPL to aquire the source
code
for the firmware (and the required compilers, starting with genfw.c which
is
4 matches
Mail list logo
