for long time for tests to avoid them.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
.
With a 6.0.2.1 amd64 netinstall CD, things are just fine.
...
It does seem to be a kernel issue so I reassigned it according.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http
that affected s390.
That's awesome :-)
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
into the
initrd.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 22:12, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
Mostly; the only addition situation we'll need to rebuild the
installer is when the amount of translation changes for a specific
language so we get the 'translation
this is going to make the installer release process easier to
understand and handle.
Please share your ideas regarding those proposed changes so we can
start looking on the required changes to accomplish all this.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
--
Otavio Salvador
ota...@debian.org
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 11:50, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
It is enabled and according to
http://packages.debian.org/sid/s390/linux-image-2.6.39-2-s390x/filelist
correctly included. Please show more evidence.
Missing on tape flavour.
--
Otavio Salvador
so I think we could do it case by
base (arch specificly) by now.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
Currently there're a development of partman-nbd for integration into
Debian Installer and we started pushing the required changes to
integrate it. Regarding kernel support, s390 is the only missing
architecture.
This bug is more a
for it on 24th or 25th.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 18:19, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
It depends on the ETA for 6.0.1. I'd a week before the targeted date
assuming it builds fine on all arches. For a confort level, I'd say a
cuple of weeks
the
deadline is for that?
...
It depends on the ETA for 6.0.1. I'd a week before the targeted date
assuming it builds fine on all arches. For a confort level, I'd say a
cuple of weeks like a good time for we to update the installer for it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail
reassign 608538 btrfs-tools
retitle 608538 Didn't include required module in initramfs
thanks
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 09:06, Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com wrote:
No, nothing. But I truly only get an initramfs prompt.
It looks to be a btrfs-tools hook issue.
Reassigning it.
--
Otavio Salvador
is noted
in /dev).
Can you send us a copy of /var/log/installer/syslog (gzipped)?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Hello,
We have updated kernel version in installer and I would like to ask
you to give it a try.
Please try
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/20101016-16:05/netboot/mini.iso
Thanks in advance,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Holger Wansing li...@wansing-online.de wrote:
PLEASE NOTE, THAT THIS IS WITH ide_generic LOADED!
ata_generic is not available on the d-i at that time,
but ide_generic is.
I have queued it to be included in next kernel update for d-i.
--
Otavio
#571035, an debian-testing daily build from
23. Aug 2010.
That kernel boots fine!!!
You might try to use the installer and chroot into /target and install
the latest 486 kernel and see if it boots.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Holger Wansing li...@wansing-online.de wrote:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
We need to know the date of it ;-)
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota
if it works for you.
This is the kernel intended to be used in Squeeze Installer and we
have more freedom to fix issues on it then changing stuff in Lenny.
Thanks in advance,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55
Hello Vincent,
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
Hello Vincent,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Vincent McIntyre
vince.mcint...@atnf.csiro.au wrote:
this problem is also occurring on Dell Optiplex 780 machines,
the PCI ID of the network card
inform us the URL you used to get the image?
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ
team can guide you better then me
on how to debug this issue.
Thanks in advance,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Hello,
I'd like to confirm this bug since I have exactly same situation. :-(
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
arches?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
this will
change the kernel ABI.
Please do; this allow us to get rid of the PAT bug :-)
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel
Hello Luca,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Luca Capellol...@pca.it wrote:
Is there any strong opposition to s3c24xx?
I fully agree that it looks the most logical name for it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
for usage by those old
machines) and I'd also support it not being available for all
installer flavours but I do think we can't just drop support for those
machines.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53
) to include generic optimizations, should work
on all x86 then. Maybe rename them somehow later.
* Make ipv6 support built-in for several arches.
The i486 flavour is our default for the installer; what would be the
new default kernel?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail
To kernel people: is this something that's likely to be fixed in
2.6.28|2.6.29 ?
Yes, 2.6.27 already supports it in e1000e module, check:
ota...@neumann { ~/hacking/linux-2.6 }$ git describe
f4187b56e1f8a05dd110875d5094b21b51ebd79b
v2.6.27-rc4-296-gf4187b5
--
Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
lets...@home.nl lets...@home.nl writes:
[...]
I consider it Debian's problem, and I am willing to invest some time
to help, if needed.
That is great and it is very welcome.
I think I have given enough info via mail until now:
03/08 - a link
(droped other mailing list that are not suppose to handle this specific
issue)
dann frazier da...@debian.org writes:
Stable
--
There are several fixes queued up for a stable upload. I have a
few more small fixes from jmm to review/commit as well, and it looks
like tbm has an RTC
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:49:14AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:16:09AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
I don't think so, AFAIK missing PCI IDs are routinily added to kernel
updates
also in pointreleases.
Yes they are. But
Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes:
This means that we have to back it out again and the only question is if
we will do that for r0 or r1.
I think it's best to delay that to r1. Can someone please provide a text
for the release notes to describe the problem, TIA?
I also agree about let it for
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com writes:
Then: when and where would be a good time to meet up?
Hello? Anyone?
I won't be at FOSDEM :(
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dann frazier da...@debian.org writes:
hey,
I wanted to give -release -boot a heads up that the kernel team is
looking to do a linux-2.6 upload to sid tomorrow. As discussed on the
d-i channel, delays in the d-i release have given us a short
D d [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After start installer, without my action, lsmod show ahci and pata_marvell
modules as loaded, but installer can't recognise drive.
I see my ide drive, only after action:
modprobe -r ahci
modprobe -r pata_marvell
and as order
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi folks
Please unblock linux-2.6/2.6.26-11. It introduces another stable update
and fixes several other problems.
Please unblock linux-modules-extra-2.6/2.6.26-5. It is a schedules
rebuild to introduce
Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Montag, den 20.10.2008, 10:19 -0200 schrieb Otavio Salvador:
... It is a kernel issue, no doubt however I'm unsure
why it happens. A good guess is to install linux-image-2.6.26-1-486
and try to boot using this.
Oi Otavio,
As you suggested I installed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi folks
Please unblock linux-2.6/2.6.26-8.
No objection from d-i POV. I'll wait it to be built on all
architectures and do a massupload.
The just missed one is mipsel, I hope it gets done by tomorrow.
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
We're ready, from d-i POV, to start moving installer udebs and upload
RC1 installer however I'd like to know what are the planned updates
for the kernel before Lenny release?
If those updates are going to happen next days, I'd prefer to wait
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 02:58:47PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Bastian Blank wrote:
For a short-term fix I only see three solutions:
- Continue to upload to unstable, drop virtualbox modules.
- Upload to testing-proposed-updates.
- Let virtualbox-ose
of nic-lme-modules as suggested
on the atl2 bug report to follow same schema we have been doing for
external modules. It looks more logical for me.
Otavio Salvador (10):
Add support to atl2 package building to massbuild script
Add atl2 modules. Closes: #490354.
Add atl2-modules
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
shall we give a README.Debian note on the vserser-xen flavour dropping?
I'd say a NEWS entry.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User:
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:53:22PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
i'll announce upload of 2.6.26-1 for tomorrow, will hit NEW.
Nack.
Do you mind to be more descriptive?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:12:32 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
shall we give a README.Debian note on the vserser-xen flavour dropping?
I'd say a NEWS entry.
If the package doesn't exist anymore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
latest 2.6.25 stable release is in testing, we expect to keep it as backup
plan for lenny. release team wishes to have unstable coverage of 2.6.26
before final ack on that release.
If this is the
Daniel Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:15:14 +0200
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When a new stable *is* uploaded, D-I should be able to switch
faster too (at least, if there's someone willing to do the initial
kernel-wedge work) as the main
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:09:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 07 July 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
There are valid arguments to be found for staying with 2.6.25 a bit
longer, but D-I has not yet converted to it is NOT one of them.
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
.26 is the release kernel.
so i'm happy with push on it.
.25 is a possible backup.
I'd like to get an official statement from RM team about that so we
can move it further.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-07 17:30]:
In fact, having 2.6.25 in testing would possibly make it easier for
the kernel team to do a final (?) 2.6.25 upload with latest stable
updates.
FWIW, I
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hello
now that d-i released last beta that 2.6.25 state in unstable
is fine, we'd want that backup option for the upcoming release
in testing.
please hint linux-2.6 2.6.25-6, linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.25-2,
linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.25-5
Please
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 22 June 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I've prepared a set of patches against current kernel-wedge to update
it.
Thanks.
- ide-generic-pci
I haven't add it since I found no reference about it being used by
other distros and then I
reassign 482675 linux-2.6
retitle 482675
found 482675 2.6.24-7
thanks
Marcus Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Comments/Problems:
This is a brand new machine, also the harddrive is a new 1 TB sata (tried the
same on an old 200 GB sata, but same problem).
Everyting goes well until its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I know we're a bit late about Beta2 and that it was suppose to have
been released just after Beta1.
Unfortunately, my daily work prevented me from giving the needed time
and love that is required for the installer release. I finally
finished
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Mario Lang, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 17:28:32 +0100, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(speakup can now be compiled fully independently)
linux-modules-extra-2.6 seems like the perfect place for speakup, now that it
does not
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2.6.24 window is closed anyway.
You mean the upstream or the Debian?
debian
Ah, so since Lenny's d-i is supposed to use 2.6.24, speakup won't make
it into it :/
Beta2 is probably going to be released with 2.6.24 but I guess lenny
will still
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+--+---+
| Date | What happens |
+--+---+
|March 8, 2008 |test of images starts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Here goes a new status update about release.
Please respect the reply-to header and please follow up to debian-boot
mailing list.
Bellow is the updated timeline:
+--+---+
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Here goes a new status update about release.
Please respect the reply-to header and please follow up to debian-boot
mailing list.
Bellow is the timeline we're following.
+--+---+
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Here goes a new status update about release.
Please respect the reply-to header and please follow up to debian-boot
mailing list.
Bellow is the timeline we're following.
+--+---+
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:05:15PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Before I replay to the proposal and the various options, I have two
questions:
1) Exactly what problem or problems is this proposal solving?
Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
I personally have a good relation with all active people in
debian-kernel but I think that we might have a policy to avoid
problems to happen. Good will isn't enough, IMO.
We should decide case by case, considering what is best to get closer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Here goes a new status update about release.
Please respect the reply-to header and please follow up to debian-boot
mailing list.
Bellow is the timeline we're following.
+--+---+
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:40:47PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
If a unwanted kernel is uploaded to sid and we wanted to update the
udebs, for a release or something, we would end up doing it
t-p-u
Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:31:05PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Is impossible to release d-i with a different kernel from sid
without a lot of hassle
- If a bad kernel, with a bunch of ugly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil McGovern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 04:49:51PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I hereby ask for a block on linux-2.6 source package until d-i Beta1
gets out. If it migrates before we do the final images we can need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While I'm not nacking it right now, I nack it to happen before Beta2
with 2.6.24 gets out.
...
Build the udebs from the linux-2.6/linux-modules-extra-2.6 sources.
Pros:
- Only one step.
- Problems in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:31:05PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
...
- Is impossible to release d-i with a different kernel from sid
without a lot of hassle
d-i releases are built with testing udebs
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 02:13:02PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
...
And the udebs on testing migrated to it from sid. I hope to not need
to do uploads to t-p-u for d-i kernel ;-)
I still don't get you.
Kernel udebs on testing came from sid. So
the
scenes and what you can do to help us to get the release out.
Cheers,
Otavio Salvador
Debian Installer Release Manager
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/
iD8DBQFHtH3aLqiZQEml
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello RM and SRM teams,
I hereby ask for a block on linux-2.6 source package until d-i Beta1
gets out. If it migrates before we do the final images we can need to
delay d-i release.
As discussed[1] previously at debian-boot we've decided to stay at
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello RM and SRM teams,
I hereby ask for a block on linux-2.6 source package until d-i Beta1
gets out. If it migrates before we do the final images we can need to
delay d-i release.
nacked
Philippe Cloutier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le February 14, 2008 01:56:55 pm maximilian attems, vous avez écrit :
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello RM and SRM teams,
I hereby ask for a block on linux-2.6 source package until d-i Beta1
gets out. If it migrates before we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
linux-2.6 can't migrate to testing with normal delays before 2008-02-21. The
planned beta release on 2008-03-03 is 11 days later.
Also, this assumes
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given we're doing a beta based on 2.6.22 now, how quickly could we get
another beta based on 2.6.24 out? Can you be done relatively quickly
after the beta based on 2.6.22?
I guess we can.
d-i itself isn't receiving deeply changes latelly (except
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
With all comments that has been sent to this thread, I've changed the
timeline to the following:
+--+---+
| Date | What happens |
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
Because of changes in the installation procedure since I implemented
the sarge-support udeb, I first needed to ensure installation of the
etch-support udeb is queued in cdrom-detect and iso-scan. With that, we
will have the following situation:
-
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
We have 2.6.22 as a safe bed on lenny now and their udebs are there
too however since EtchAndHalf intends to release with 2.6.24 and it
has been uploaded to sid already I'm considering a better option to
us to release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ Reply-To adjusted to debian-boot so we can keep this discussion in a
single mailing list ]
Hello folks,
I've been working at migrations of packages for lenny and I think
we're more or less fine to define a timeline to the end of Febuary for
the
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Brian Almeida:
I've been unable to find an official debian kernel which has
Xen supporter after 2.6.18-5 (released with etch). While I realize
there were changes in later kernels that complicated the patches,
Ubuntu has had Xen support for 2.6.22
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 01:38:15PM -0500, Brian Almeida wrote:
Debian can't be the only Linux distribution out there
trying to get Xen working on the latest kernels properly...
until now this bug report has only hot air, aka useless.
yes there
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(Moving thread to cloned BR.)
On Thursday 15 November 2007, you wrote:
the new stack is very promising,
we will reconsider later if no eth1394 shows up,
for now that's just a minor regression.
No, that is not a minor regression. Half the functionality
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
unless objection or people having something queued,
i'll upload today after checking buildserver builds
of current sid.
it has the last 2.6.22 stable updates.
Please do it asap. :-)
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+binary-install/initramfs-tools::
+install -m 644 -o 0 -g 0 debian/initramfs-tools.triggers \
+debian/initramfs-tools/DEBIAN/triggers
no i-t uses cdbs,
please add to debian/initramfs-tools.install
but maybe i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
= New stuff =
* win32-loader has been added to daily CD images and is now used for
autorun too;
* multipath-udeb and libaio1-udeb have been introduced but are being
excluded from CD builds since they're not being used yet;
*
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 08:30:42PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
We need to add the last few stable update for 2.6.22. Any volunteers?
No. We need license and SC fixes.
SC? It's not worse what we have now so I'd consider it for 2.6.23
instead of
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now that 2.6.22 is finally in testing, we should start planning to
upload 2.6.22-5. This update is definitely needed on mips since it
fixes two important bugs:
- #444104: Kernel crashes on boot on IP32 (SGI O2): this kernel
flavour currently
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-06 21:29]:
Now that 2.6.22 is finally in testing, we should start planning to
upload 2.6.22-5. This update is definitely needed on mips since it
fixes two important bugs:
i don't get your premise.
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Both #317258 and #410817 are showing activity now, but its difficult
to predict when they will be resolved. In the meantime, I'm going to
upload our current set of changes to proposed-updates so we can
increase the testing pool. If these issues get
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this looks correct, I'll submit it upstream and then we can
look at backporting it into a stable update.
It looks like you've defined the HP_NETRAID[12]M_SUBSYS_DID constansts
however forgot to change to code to use them and on the if you use the
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this looks correct, I'll submit it upstream and then we can
look at backporting it into a stable update.
It looks like you've defined the HP_NETRAID[12]M_SUBSYS_DID constansts
however forgot to change
Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Looks like we need to discuss the available options for this
problem. Other issue is to know if current snapshots of 2.6.23 does
work or not on this hardware.
Bernd, can you test lastest 2.6.23 snapshot and see if it works? Check
at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
New stuff
- -
* New virtual package 'keyboard-setup' has been introduced to allow
easy testing of console-setup. Previously, auto-install forced
kbd-chooser to get in the image.
* Default to not using a mirror if the user selected to
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For that matter, if someone in the project decides that they have need for a
different kernel than the one the kernel team wants to ship (for a
particular port, or to support older hardware, or to support a newer
cutting-edge kernel design, or for some
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:11:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
I object; if and when there ever is a new upstream kernel branch that we
want to track separately this would have to be
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:11:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
I object; if and when there ever is a new upstream kernel branch that we
want
New stuff
-
* volatile support has been added.
* g-i use dejavu for rendering Georgian text. Bug #435970 has been
reported asking for udeb removal.
* weekly builds has been enabled again and are now using sid
installer.
* partman now uses relatime mount option by default.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
First we'd like to say thank you to Frans Pop by his work as Debian Installer
Release Manager and we (Jeremy, Joey and Otavio) are starting to work as a team
to manage the next Debian Installer release.
It won't be an easy task and we'll do mistakes,
Dawn Light [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Booting without the noapic parameter works. I'll be happy to send you logs or
anything that will help - just tell me where they are :).
Now I'm confuse.
Does it works on your current system that you had problems before or
on daily images? Besides, what
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
