I am writing seeking some clarity. What is the team consensus on this?
Is this something you are happy to do, would consider doing, or is it
off the table? That would help us see where we are.
Many thanks.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/1065416#108
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Debian Testing / Bookworm now has firmware-sof-signed (2.1.1-1) and this
appears to now be resolved, both audio speakers work as expected, please
can this be marked as resolved.
On Mon, 30 May 2022 at 12:20, Sean Clarke
wrote:
> Just to confirm, this is still not resolved in a latest inst
Just to confirm, this is still not resolved in a latest install.
Regards
Sean
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 at 19:57, Debian Bug Tracking System <
ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote:
> Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
> this Bug report.
>
> This is an autom
Just to confirm, 5.17 (and its later packages) is now in Bookworrm repos,
checked on an install today and still this firmware appears to be missing.
Regards
Sean
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 08:39, Debian Bug Tracking System <
ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote:
> Thank you for the additional in
updated to kernel 5.17rc8 (needed for another bug I raised) and downloaded
version 1.9.3 of intel-signed sof-adl.ri from the SOF Project (
https://github.com/thesofproject).
The sound is now recognised, I can hear audio - when "test right" is played
no audio is observed, when "tet left" is selecte
Updated kernel to 5.17rc8 and god this from dmesg:
[ 17.625420] Intel(R) Wireless WiFi driver for Linux
[ 17.625543] iwlwifi :00:14.3: enabling device ( -> 0002)
[ 17.628755] iwlwifi :00:14.3: firmware: failed to load
iwlwifi-so-a0-gf-a0-69.ucode (-2)
[ 17.62] iwlwifi :
It appears that package is indeed installed:
sudo dpkg --list | grep firmware-s
ii firmware-sof-signed 1.9-1 all Intel SOF firmware - signed
sudo apt install firmware-sof-signed
[sudo] **
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
fir
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.16.12-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: sean.cla...@sec-consulting.co.uk
Dear Maintainer,
New Alienware X15 R2 with Alder Lake-P sound. Sound not detceted, no options or
device shown in alsa.
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 5.16.0-4-amd64 (deb
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.16.12-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: sean.cla...@sec-consulting.co.uk
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
New Alienware installed with Debian Bookworm/Testing. WiFi not detected
correctly and not showi
Small updates/notes:
- Apparently a few additional "release" tags have been made since opening
this
- I believe #940813 is the same issue
Package: firmware-iwlwifi
Version: 20190717-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
It looks like a newer version of modules is available as version 20190815:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tag/?h=20190815
I have a newer Lenovo Yoga X1 (Gen 4) and the 20
`git pull --rebase` won't start the rebase too early, so it's
fine to use it.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Fri 17 Aug 2018 at 04:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Issues with using git debrebase for linux"):
>> Unfortunately, I do not know precisely what conditions are required such
>> that git-rebase is able to strip both commits and rever
nditions are required such
that git-rebase is able to strip both commits and reversions of those
commits. Presumably your script is not meeting those conditions.
To be clear, --autosquash is not needed for this behaviour; when the
stripping works, it does not require passing any option to t
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.14.7-1~bpo9+1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
System updated from backports, rebooted, GDM fails, rolledback kernel version
to previous (running now) and all is OK.
-- Package-specific info:
** Kernel log: boot messages should be attached
** Model informatio
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.9.30-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
on a fresh Stretch install on a Alienware Area 51 R2 audio is not working
from the built in sound card.
If I increase settings to max aidio is very very faintly heard, but below
whisper levels.
I have tweak
. But maybe someone should just add them to the
firmware-realtek package. Pardon my ingorance but I do believe that these
files are architecture, distro, and whatever-else agnostic.
Best,
Sean
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.8-9
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I am the administrator of a network of systems which use kerberized NFSv3 to
mount user
homedirs across systems. On one particular machine, we were running jessie but
had not yet
switched to systemd. After switching t
.2.y if it doesn't work as-is. I'll
take a look at doing that when I get time, if no one else does it first.
When is the freeze for stuff like this for Wheezy?
Sincerely,
Sean M. Pappalardo
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Hello.
I just want to find out if the package
linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64 (and the 3.2.x-rt one in Wheezy) are
built with 1000Hz timer resolution in addition to the RT patch?
Sincerely,
Sean M. Pappalardo
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
upstream might we see it
in Debian Testing?
(Also, the reply message address for subscribing to bug reports is too
long (username part) and my mail server rejects it, so please make sure
to CC me on replies.)
Sincerely,
Sean M. Pappalardo
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 07:25:58AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 08/30/2011 06:16 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > I concur with Sean Finney that nfs-utils should Build-Depend on
> > libnfsidmap-dev >= 0.24 to ease backporting.
> >
> > I'm hoping to prepar
Package: nfs-utils
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: normal
The upstream m4/autofoo only enables nfsidmapd related stuff if it
finds certain api functions available, which after some investigation
appears to have been introduced in 0.24.
This will otherwise cause FTBFS's for anyone wanting to backport t
Maybe I am wrong here, but shouldn't the cast be to (unsigned long) or to
(sector_t)?
Line 534 of commit.c:
jbd_debug(4, "JBD: got buffer %llu (%p)\n",
(unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr,
bh->b_data);
Line 64 of buffer_head.h:
sector
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-5
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Selecting previously deselected package linux-image-2.6.38-2-ixp4xx.
(Reading database ... 32586 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking linux-image-2.6.38-2-ixp4xx (from
.../linux-image-2
Package: linux-image-2.6.38-2-sparc64
Version: 2.6.38-3
Random Kernel Panic occurring during boot or within 20-30 minutes.
scsi target0:0:6: Ending Domain Validation
[ 87.834460] kernel BUG at
/build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.38-3-sparc-675DHN/linux-2.6-2.6.38/debian/build/source_sparc_none/drivers
For your reference, I finally got a Kernel bug account set up and
submitted kernel bug #15362:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15362
Let me know if there's anything else you might need from me on the
Debian side.
Sincerely,
Sean M. Pappa
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Sean,
> did you receive a bug confirmation mail? Does the problem persist
> with 2.6.32?
I never got a confirmation E-mail and the problem does indeed still
exist with kernel 2.6.32-amd64. (Sorry for the delay, I haven't had time
to get to that machine
The kernel bug system's confirmation message hasn't arrived in over 24
hours. I can't file a bug there without that. Is there any way you can
file one?
<<->>
This E-Mail message has been scanned for viruses
and cleared
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.30-6
Severity: normal
Attached is the system info from a normal boot on kernel 2.6.26-2-amd64 for
comparison
-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Archit
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
Severity: normal
Attached is the system info when booting without any troubleshooting options.
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.30-1-amd64 (Debian 2.6.30-6) (wa...@debian.org) (gcc version
4.3.4 (Debian 4.3.4-1) ) #1 SMP Sat Aug 15 18:09
But I added that parameter as a troubleshooting step after seeing
similar complaints elsewhere on the Web. (It made no difference.) I
still have the problem with that mptbase.mpt_msi_enable=0 removed.
Sean
<<-&
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.30-5
Severity: important
Since upgrading to the 2.6.30 kernel, drives attached to my LSI/MPT SCSI
controller are no longer visible. If I boot using the 2.6.26-2 kernel, it works
fine.
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.30-1-
Thanks for the tip, but I just tried rootdelay=9. It does not help on
the Vortex86SX.
Sean
maximilian attems wrote:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 01:35:32PM -0700, Sean wrote:
Christian,
According to this PDF, if you are getting "Waiting for root file system"
on bootup, IT821X I
el.
http://www.compactpc.com.tw/drivers/ebox-2300SX/Vortex86SX_Linux_HowTo.pdf
Sean Lazar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64
Version: 2.6.26-13lenny2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
*** /tmp/reportbug-linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64-20090617-4201-OxIDWT
Subject: linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:3008
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-xe
bably when I upgraded to
2.6.26-8 (but I can't be certain). Still a problem with -9.
Thanks,
Sean
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
happens).
i'll also try installing some vanilla upstream kernels to see if they suffer
from the same problems...
sean
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 03:36:08PM -0400, Norberto Feliberty wrote:
>
> > Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:10:44 +0200
>
n the -powerpc and -kernel lists:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2008/10/msg00029.html
and the fix is included in the upcoming upload of 2.6.26 from the d-k
snapshot repo, information for which is available at:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
sean
-BEGIN PGP SIGN
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 01:35:33PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> yes 2.6.26.6 will be in the next upload use sid branch snapshots for now
> -> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
ooh, i didn't know about this service! i'll use that for the
time being, tha
or the pointer.
d-k folks: is there any feasibility for getting this fix into lenny, or am I
just SoL?
sean
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
which is also a good place to find a package sponsor.
anyway, hope that information is helpful,
sean
On Monday 28 January 2008 05:59:10 pm May Hwang wrote:
> Dear Debian Developer,
>
>
>
> This is May Hwang, Product Manager from HighPoint Technologies. HighPoint
>
hi martin,
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 12:32:02 am Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Sean, did you have a chance to tese these kernel images I prepared?
> If not, I suggest we close this bug saying that it has been fixed in
> newer kernels.
i haven't yet, but i would really like to t
hi martin,
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 11:15:12 am Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-21 09:10]:
> > i don't really have the resources to try compilingpatched arm kernels,
> > but if you do and want me to test something just let m
hiya,
On Friday 21 September 2007 08:49:52 am you wrote:
> * sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-20 23:45]:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-ixp4xx
> >
> > same story as this guy:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg06810.html
>
&
On Friday 21 September 2007 08:49:52 am Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-20 23:45]:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-ixp4xx
> >
> > same story as this guy:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg06810.html
>
&
Package: ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.21+1.2.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i opened my laptop this morning to discover i no longer had a network
driver :(
rangda[/home/sean] dpkg-deb -c
/var/cache/apt
Where do I tell Debian
to run this procedure?
Thanks very much for your time and insight.
Sincerely,
Sean M. Pappalardo
<<->>
This E-Mail message has been scanned for viruses
and cleared by >>SmartMa
/initrd.img.old is a damaged link
Removing symbolic link initrd.img.old
Unless you used the optional flag in lilo,
you may need to re-run lilo
a simple "which lilo" could probably determine
whether mentioning lilo were appropriate.
sean
- -- System Information:
Debian Releas
& Confirmation Link
http://www.n8mort.com/?id=s12
Cheers,
Sean Michael
Senior Broker Adviser
Canceling Information:
http://www.n8mort.com/book.php
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686-smp
Severity: important
under normal usage running x & kde etc. the kernel oopsed causing X to restart
into gdm. Logging into the system
again, during kde's startup a message poped up saying kde couldn't start
kdeinit and when kde had finished loading
applic
On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 4:51 pm, maximilian attems wrote:
> severity 284783 serious
> thanks
>
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Sean O'Dubhghaill wrote:
> > I'm now running 2.6.10 (not from unstable though it's vanilla with ac1
> > patches) and I haven't had
Hi maks
I'm now running 2.6.10 (not from unstable though it's vanilla with ac1
patches) and I haven't had a single kernel opps since. I've attached a dmesg
from the kernel i'm currently running. If you would like I can switch back to
an older kernel to test it/get a
Package: kernel-image-2.6.9-1-686-smp
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Under normal use (running kde, konqueor etc) my kernel oops causing the
machine to freeze requiring a hard reset. From looking at the oops
message (which is attached) i suspect it has something to do
54 matches
Mail list logo
