On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 09:59:30AM +0200, Michael Henneton wrote:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
Michael,
Please resend in plain-text.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:41:09AM +0200, The Anarcat wrote:
Available for debugging/testing with right tools/instructions...
Can you try the 2.6.17 kernel from sid and see if it improves things?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
, drop to a shell and wget the drivers from
your server
* Use insmod/modprobe to load these modules
* return to the installer
If you have problems, like you don't have access to an http server,
etc, hop on #debian-ia64 i'll try to help you out.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
, and retrying
2.6.17-6. Please let us know how that works for you.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and fjp just in case its
eventual propagation into etch would affect d-i? My current assumption
is that it isn't a problem unless we change the ABI.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. But to reiterate, if
something in a kernel update causes the patch to no longer apply, I
would want to have a reliable contact (hopefully 2 people) whom we can
call upon for assistance.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
merged upstream in
2.6.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and version string if you plan to distribute your
work, so that it is clearly diffentiated from ours when users file bug
reports.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
useful
feedback.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 06:56:50PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:10:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
The only technical issue is getting the meta packages to play well. I
think rough consensus was to leave the metapackages as-is in
linux-2.6.16 and either 1) drop
?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
What is the status of the other architectures?
ia64 configs have been updated test builds are in progress
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
/netfilter|related/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_ULOG.c
Marked for consideration for a sarge stable update.
I use Debian GNU/Linux 3.1r2 (with last updates),
kernel 2.6.8-2-686-smp.
That's not the latest, fwiw - make sure you have
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp installed.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
the 2.6.16 kernel from sid to see if the problem
goes away? I'm unaware of any patches in the Debian kernel that are
likely to change this behavior.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:39:16PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:29:32AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Is the plan to do a linux-2.6.16 upload at the same time, or does
this imply a decision to use = 2.6.17 in etch?
We have not yet decided about what
probably keep the
2.6.16 compiler hardcoded to whatever is the default in etch when we
upload (its still gcc-4.0 today, right)? This way we won't
unintentionally break module loading with updates to
stable/stable-security when rebuilding in a pristine etch environment.
--
dann frazier
it unless someone steps up
to handle this. Of course, you could always request insecure status
from the release team (with proper release notes, etc).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:29:49PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060526 15:14]:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:24:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:20:38PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
need some further discussion among
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:46:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:09:45PM -0500, dann frazier wrote:
Kernel udeb creation process (possibly using k-p?)
-
If we build all of the *existing* udebs from a single source, we
hey,
Frans Pop assembled an informal BoF at DebConf to discuss cross-team
issues related to the kernel[1]. Attendees included:
Micah Anderson (micah)
Andreas Barth (aba)
dann frazier (dannf)
Joey Hess (joeyh)
Moritz Muehlenhoff (jmm)
Frans Pop (fjp)
Manoj Srivastava (manoj
, sorry for the crudeness of that wiki page; I had to leave
before I finished cleaning it up figured I'd just commit it first.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a
decision. I'll point Adrian to this thread so that he can see that we
are looking at his work with some interest.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:18:29AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
I believe there's a rough consensus to not ship 2.4 in etch. Anyone
object to a filing of bugs to remove these packages from etch?
Mips/mipsel d-i hasn't fully switched to 2.6 yet. Is there a urgent
need
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:57:51AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-16 17:04]:
I believe there's a rough consensus to not ship 2.4 in etch. Anyone
object to a filing of bugs to remove these packages from etch?
For mips/mipsel, there's at least one
that will be available in time to
meet our release schedule, without counting on this possible update
later.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(devfs removal, udev, initramfs transition,
linux-2.6 transition, etc).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
56936 9
snd_intel8x0,snd_ac97_codec,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_timer,snd_mpu401_uart,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq_device
soundcore 11232 2 snd
hey Francisco,
Please send the unfiltered output of lsmod.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 01:34:17PM +0200, V??clav Ovs??k wrote:
It seems to be ok, patch solved problem.
Thanks.
Regards
Thank you for your quick response. This patch has been committed and
should appear in the next 2.6.16 upload.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
fine.
Please remember, this is only for a limited time, and at that time,
we'll be quite busy with etch issues. And, BTW, kernel developers should
know when a new kernel arrives. :)
I think you've hit on a brilliant idea Andreas - let's get all sid
kernel users to join the kernel team!
--
dann
will assist.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 01:26:29PM +0200, Robert Derochette wrote:
# CONFIG_HZ_100 is not set
CONFIG_HZ_250=y
# CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set
CONFIG_HZ=250
Thank you. I suspect if you set HZ to 1000 this problem will
reappear. See my previous follow-up for details.
--
dann frazier
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 06:23:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 05:08:34PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:31:30PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 09:40:37AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 05:00:03PM -0600
Processor Athlon 64 3000+
Done, thanks for the update.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:31:30PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 09:40:37AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 05:00:03PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
I don't know what Bastian was intending; but the scenario I mentioned
was to:
1) Upload linux
in this
discussion.
fyi, I will be there, and would very much like to participate.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
agree; at this point 2.6.16.x looks ideal. I stress at this point
though; we of course shouldn't make this decision irreversible.
Especially if, as Sven noted, Andrew Morton decides to maintain a .17
or .18 in a similar manner.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
me if I missed your point.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:36:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:39:23PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:02:29AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:15:45AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:46:12AM +0200
not install that file on my system.
'dpkg -S /etc/dev.d/block/hal-unmount.dev' will show you what package
claims this file, if any.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for whatever information you could need. I can also test things if
you don't have hardware available for testing and you need it.
hey Miriam,
Can you provide the exact error messages you see?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 02:39:49AM +0200, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
Hi,
I'm use debian from last 5 years, and I like to know if installing oracle
is a security risk for my systems.
You might be better served by contacting the debian-user list.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
a major + major-1 support model.
I of course agree with you that there's no reason to preclude
user-built kernels; and we certainly need to maintain the upgrade path.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is causing it.
hey Joe,
Can you try the 2.6.16 kernel in sid and see if this problem still exists?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
It appears that the kernel is responding appropriately to attempts to
load modules that *should* fail. Therefore, I'll reassign to
hotplug, since it appears that hotplug is the package trying to load
these modules.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
reassign 241670 kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa
tag 241670 sarge
stop
linux-2.6 descriptions include the string multi-processor, so this
only affects sarge. sarge/hppa was 2.6-only, so it only affects 2.6.8
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
-headers-$version is the filed shared by all
of the linux-headers-$version-$abiname-all-$arch packages - so what
about linux-headers-$version-common, or linux-headers-$version-shared?
The word support doesn't make sense to me in this context.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
forward 360232 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6307
tag 360232 + unreproducible
stop
This has already been submitted upstream, and is being discussed on
linux-ia64[1]. However, none of the developers have been able to
reproduce, likely because we don't have this hardware.
--
dann
in Debian/sid so far (2.6.16-[234]).
This user didn't specify which one, but I was unable to reproduce on
my HP rx2600 with either -3 or -4, and I see nothing in the -3
changelog that looks like it could've caused this behavior:
http://changelog.debian.net/linux-2.6
--
dann frazier | HP Open
gone upstream, changeset is here:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|src/|src/drivers|src/drivers/md|related/drivers/md/lvm-snap.c
This should go into a non-security sarge update, when (and if) that
happens. Thanks Clive.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
comes. Doing either of these now would also fix iptables
for you.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it to wishlist in order for the merge to succeed.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 12:05:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge2
Segmentation fault message during boot. It apperas here
I don't see anything that points to a kernel problem. Can you try
regenerating your initrd and trying
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 02:36:05PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
should we upload 2.6.16-2 today, to get ia64 and hppa into the archive?
Only m68k would be left then, and could be scheduled as 2.6.16-3 upload
when it's done.
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
Didn't see this
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 10:11 +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hi,
As of now, the following architectures still need updated configs:
alpha
Configured fine for me, we'll see what the buildds do
hppa (#356629)
Should be fixed in r6256
ia64 had problems, but it should be good as of r6255
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 16:53 +, Sudhakar Manukonda wrote:
Hi,
We are using (Redhat 32bit ) and (Suse 64bit) machines .
The g++ compiler version we use is gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat
Linux 7.2 2.96-124.7.2)
The gcc compiler for suse is gcc version 3.3.3 (SUSE Linux)
Package: klibc-utils
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: important
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 22:07 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
hello dannf,
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 05:00:35PM +, Dann Frazier wrote:
Log:
* [ia64] use yaird on ia64 until #341181 is fixed
hm indeed the bug itself is not closed
Daniel,
Please provide the output of:
lspci -v
lspci -n
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 21:46 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
as we're now on track in getting sarge r2 out, I'm interessted when the
next kernel update should happen - and of course if there is something
important from your side. As far as I understood, that update will be an
ABI-change,
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:02 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, dann frazier wrote:
snipp
can you please check which klibc is installed?
1.2.4-1
ok thanks for feedback.
and if the initramfs you were booting contains this latest klibc?
Yes - I explicitly
on these patches and their suitability for
inclusion in Debian kernels.
hey Ryan,
Your best bet is to continue to push for upstream acceptance:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
sorry; this is just another occurrence of #341181. I thought this had
been fixed for some reason[1]. I'll go ahead and close this one and
undo [1] for ia64.
[1] svn diff svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel -r5595:5597
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 22:19 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, dann frazier wrote:
sorry; this is just another occurrence of #341181. I thought this had
been fixed for some reason[1]. I'll go ahead and close this one and
undo [1] for ia64.
[1] svn diff svn
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 13:56 -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:38:58AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
hey Ryan,
Your best bet is to continue to push for upstream acceptance:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
What about the fact
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.53
Severity: important
NET: Registered protocol family 1
NET: Registered protocol family 17
Freeing unused kernel memory: 336kB freed
Loading, please wait...
Begin: Loading essential driversSCSI subsystem initialized
... ...
tg3.c:v3.47 (Dec 28, 2005)
GSI 29
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
In kernel.org 2.6.8, the block layer (drivers/block/ioctl.c) has:
case BLKFLSBUF:
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EACCES;
if (disk-fops-ioctl) {
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 18:12 +0100, Yann Rouillard wrote:
I can't say I'm a fan of adding another flavour. How many people are
actually using 4GB of memory on x86? I suspect (or hope) that people
who are going to be doing those sorts of things will be using x86_64
and ia64 hardware.
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.51
Severity: normal
I apt-get upgraded today noticed the following error:
Setting up linux-image-2.6.15-1-mckinley (2.6.15-6) ...
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Using mkinitramfs to build the ramdisk.
Other valid candidates: mkinitramfs
@lists.debian.org
lm-sensors: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mindi-kernel: Andree Leidenfrost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
systemimager: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hostap-modules-i386: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mol-modules-2.6.8: Jens Schmalzing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ndiswrapper-modules-i386: Andres
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:26 +0900, Horms wrote:
I have removed the original patch from sarge-security's 2.4.27-10sarge2
as I believe that these patches are far to large for a security release.
I don't believe they have been closely examined. And we don't even
have a CVE for them. Should we add
On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 23:18 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Holger Levsen wrote:
Even though 2.4 is moving very slowly nowadays (mostly security
updates,
very seldom new drivers are including), this is more work than needed,
;
pgm_check_table[0x15] = operand_exception;
-pgm_check_table[0x1C] = privileged_op;
+pgm_check_table[0x1C] = space_switch_exception;
#if defined (CONFIG_VIRT_TIMER) || defined (CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ)
pgm_check_table[0x40] = do_monitor_call;
#endif
--
dann frazier [EMAIL
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge1
I'll file a bug for this usertag it dkt-pending-sarge-update.
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---BeginMessage---
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 16:23 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 23:07 +, Stuart T. R. Rowan wrote:
Hi
Over the past few months, we've made quite a bit of progress collecting
and analyzing issues for the next sarge update. I think we're nearing a
good release point.
We currently have 8 pending issues for 2.6.8:
$ grep ^2.6.8-sarge-security * | grep -v -e N/A -e pending -e released \
-e ignored
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 23:07 +, Stuart T. R. Rowan wrote:
Hi,
The 3c59x kernel module doesn't work with vlan (802.1q) tagged packets.
Apparently the fix was committed somewhere around 2.6.10, anyway we've
upgraded our stable box to vanilla kernel 2.6.15.1 to work around this
issue -- no
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 01:45 +, RParr wrote:
If this is not the correct place to ask this question,
please tell me where to go...
I am trying to find out why the driver (arcmsr) for the
Areca RAID controllers is not included in Debian kernel 2.6.15.
I don't see such a driver in upstream
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 00:06 -0300, dererk wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 18:24 -0300, dererk wrote:
Unfortunately, you may have to. I don't think your cpus are supported
by a 686 optimized kernel, and there's no 386-smp flavor.
You can try and see if either 2.4.27
---BeginMessage---
The patch titled
CONFIG_AIRO needs CONFIG_CRYPTO
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
config_airo-needs-config_crypto.patch
From: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
airo.c currently has MICSUPPORT enabled, which requires CONFIG_CRYPTO. A
user reported
airo.c currently has MICSUPPORT enabled, which requires CONFIG_CRYPTO.
A user reported a build failure which is due to the lack of a Kconfig
dependency. See http://bugs.debian.org/344205.
This patch makes Kconfig enforce this dependency.
Signed-off-by: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 20:26 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 22 December 2005 18:39, dann frazier wrote:
Here's the current status of the woody builds:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelWoodyUpdateStatus
I could install and boot the kernel from
kernel-image-2.4.18-1
Since there has been no response from the maintainer for over a month,
I'm going to go ahead and close this one.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 21:24 +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
reassign 344205 linux-source-2.6.15
thanks
Roland Mas, 2005-12-20 22:19:44 +0100 :
Trying to build my kernel from the linux-source-2.6.14 package (and no
external patches), I get an error in drivers/net/wireless/airo.c.
Same
tags 344205 + unreproducible
stop
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 21:24 +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
reassign 344205 linux-source-2.6.15
thanks
Roland Mas, 2005-12-20 22:19:44 +0100 :
Trying to build my kernel from the linux-source-2.6.14 package (and no
external patches), I get an error in
help out with the mips build? I don't have a working mips
box.
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 17:01 +0100, Anders Boström wrote:
reopen 311357
stop
Followup-For: Bug #311357
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge1
This bug is still not fixed! Why was it set to resolved???
Our mistake; though the fix is commented out (its non-security), we
-tracking/CVE-2005-3527?op=filerev=0sc=0
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/patch-tracking/ia64-buggy-preempt?op=filerev=0sc=0
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 10:41 -0500, Rich Johnson wrote:
On Dec 12, 2005, at 1:13 PM, dann frazier wrote:
You are trying to build 2.6.8 with gcc 4. 2.6.8 isn't in sid and
gcc 4
isn't in sarge. Closing.
If you want to build this on sid anyway, try setting CC to gcc-3.3 in
your
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 23:12 -0800, Amu wrote:
Hi all,
I got the error while running make command
in on binutils.
This is list is for Debian kernel development discussions. You might
have better luck contacting a LFS or binutils mailing list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 20:20 +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
ok, so the initramfs-tools bug seems to be run-init of klibc:
a bit hard to debug if it's not possible to get into the bb shell.
will think about it and reping.
Do you think a sysrq+t would be useful?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 16:41 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 04 December 2005 11:18, Andreas Barth wrote:
So, my question is: Is there some way to tell everytime a new kernels
appears at $location, please apply all patches in $directory, and
compile it with this and that config for me? If
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 08:10 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
Yes. I really said woody.
I've imported the woody 2.4 kernel trees into an svn repository:
svn.debian.org/var/lib/gforge/chroot/home/users/dannf/woody
We're currently tracking 160 issues, across the 6
something they need to get into this release, let me know
I'll halt. Otherwise, I'll proceed upload once I've built/tested
this.
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 19:14 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:01:27PM +, Dann Frazier wrote:
Author: dannf
Date: Thu Dec 8 17:01:26 2005
New Revision: 4992
Added:
dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/patches-debian/drivers-scsi-buslogic-sysfs.patch
-s390 kernel-image-2.6-s390 kernel-image-2.6-686
Architecture: source ia64 all
Version: 2.6.14-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
kernel-image-2.6-itanium - Linux kernel 2.6
/security/kernel/patches/
http://squishy.cc/woody/
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
know of new security bugs, and they aren't in
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/patch-tracking/?rev=0sc=0
then send a note here, to the testing-security team, or
open a bug in the BTS.
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 04:12 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
BTW, also, about ia64 situation, is it possible to use yaird in
initrd case still ? I know Eric was disabling this for 0.12, but we
are still using 0.11 ?
Yaird 0.0.11 is newest release - so it _will_ be removed but _was_ not
binutils_2.16.1-3
did not.
This patch appears to fix the problem:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=9c184a073bfd650cc791956d6ca79725bb682716;hp=444d1d9bb5b724f03344c9317bc01d54a9b39073
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
reassign 338185 elilo
stop
This is actually a bug in elilo, see:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ia64m=113315906701976w=2
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hey Vagrant,
I just root caused an issue w/ the same symptom on ia64. Turns out
the bootloader was passing a bloated initrd_size option to the kernel.
Since initramfs is known to work on x86 w/ other bootloaders, I'm
thinking qemu maybe doing the same thing.
Can you try a test for me?
1)
901 - 1000 of 1189 matches
Mail list logo
