On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 13:57 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Does user-mode-linux need to be a separate source package at all?
I guess it is separate to not require building yet another variant.
Looks like merging it was discussed in 2016:
https://bugs.debian.org/837920
--
bye,
pabs
Control: notforwarded -1
On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 14:36 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> I submitted this fix upstream to the kernel some time ago. I don't
> recollect if the 4.19 kernel is what had it included.
>
>
On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 18:13 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 10:45 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Irrespective, I think it is a fair candidate to be backported if
> > 4.19
> > > missed that window. For User-Mode-Linux, The sources are the same
> > that
> > > the Debian
On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 10:45 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Irrespective, I think it is a fair candidate to be backported if
> 4.19
> > missed that window. For User-Mode-Linux, The sources are the same
> that
> > the Debian Linux kernel team maintains. So either they could pick
> this
> > commit
On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 14:36 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Control: tag -1 +fixed-upstream
>
> CC: Adding Debian Kernel Maintainers
>
>
> Hello Paul,
>
> I submitted this fix upstream to the kernel some time ago. I don't
> recollect if the 4.19 kernel is what had it included.
It went into
Control: tag -1 +fixed-upstream
CC: Adding Debian Kernel Maintainers
Hello Paul,
I submitted this fix upstream to the kernel some time ago. I don't
recollect if the 4.19 kernel is what had it included.
6 matches
Mail list logo
