On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 07:27:58PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
I'm a bit confused as to why the wrong value gets set at boot time, but
it doesn't really improve on the situation...
The buckets are created during module loading. But /etc/sysctl.conf is
evaluated earlier. Aren't you seeing errors
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:27:28AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 11:06 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
It is based on the pv-ops tree.
Excellent, I think that's the right choice. If there is anything I can
do to help please let me know.
Well, the most important thing is to
Package: linux-headers-2.6.30-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.30-8
Severity: normal
this bug is coming out of bug # 550595
alsa-source does not compile against patched headers.
See BTS for above mentioned bug.
I tried to build the modules via m-a.
m-a buildlog attached to #550595
-- System
Just to add another data point, lilo failed to run again for me too on
the 2.6.26-19lenny1 upgrade. Even after working on the previous kernel
upgrade!
I'm now totally lost wrt what triggers this bug...
To summarize:
2.6.26-17lenny2 = 2.6.26-19
lilo OK
2.6.26-19 = 2.6.26-19lenny1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 552203 alsa-source
Bug #552203 [linux-headers-2.6.30-2-amd64] linux-headers-2.6.30-2-amd64:
alsa-source does not compile against debian patched kernel headers
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-headers-2.6.30-2-amd64' to 'alsa-source'.
reassign 552203 alsa-source
forcemerge 550595 552203
severity 550595 grave
thanks
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:19:35AM +0200, Wolfgang Schnitker wrote:
this bug is coming out of bug # 550595
Well, you have to show why this is a bug here. I see none, so I'm
merging the two.
alsa-source does not
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 12:31:35PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 24.10.2009 at 09:28:22 +0200, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
Aren't you seeing errors about unknown keys during
boot?
No, I didn't, or at least not in any of the system's logs.
This is sent to
On Sat, 24.10.2009 at 09:28:22 +0200, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
The buckets are created during module loading. But /etc/sysctl.conf is
evaluated earlier. Aren't you seeing errors about unknown keys during
boot?
No, I didn't, or at least not in any of the system's logs. But I also
On Sat, 24.10.2009 at 12:48:05 +0200, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 12:31:35PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 24.10.2009 at 09:28:22 +0200, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org
wrote:
Aren't you seeing errors about unknown keys during
boot?
No, I
Subject: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: je n'arrive pas à avoir un affichage
graphique avec ma lenny et une carte graphique ATI Radeon HD
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
Version: 2.6.26-13lenny2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 552214 normal
Bug #552214 [linux-image-2.6.26-1-686] (no subject)
Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 01:33:14PM +0200, y wrote:
Who? I like to know who I'm talking with.
Subject: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: je n'arrive pas à avoir un affichage
graphique avec ma lenny et une carte graphique ATI Radeon HD
Sorry, but we don't speak french here. And even after my try to
linux-2.6_2.6.26-20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.26-20.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.26-20.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.26_2.6.26-20_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.26_2.6.26-20_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.26_2.6.26-20_all.deb
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.30-8
Severity: normal
Hi,
wireless connection suddenly disconnected, dmesg shows:
[432878.569664] wlan0: disassociating by local choice (reason=3)
[432878.573647] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:24:97:89:f5:70 try 1
[432878.928058] wlan0:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 544264 + pending
Bug #544264 [linux-2.6] devicekit-power: AC unplug and replug is not detected
Added tag(s) pending.
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 06:05:18PM +0200, Dennis Leeuw wrote:
Thank you for the quick response. See below.
well mine is even shorter, so snipping your long story, sorry on the
run.. please check for newer linux image from backports.org
it has newer ath5k.
wireless drivers are not easy to
linux-2.6_2.6.31-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.31-1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.31-1.diff.gz
linux-tree-2.6.31_2.6.31-1_all.deb
linux-support-2.6.31-1_2.6.31-1_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.31_2.6.31-1_all.deb
firmware-linux-free_2.6.31-1_all.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/firmware-linux-free_2.6.31-1_all.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.31-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.31-1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.31-1.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.31-1.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.31_2.6.31-1_all.deb
to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Stable upgrades can make the system unbootable
severity 535331 serious
Bug #535331 [linux-image-2.6.26-2-686] lilo not run after install/upgrade
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686
Version: 2.6.26-17
Severity: important
Currently discussed on bugtraq
Cut-n-pasting the email
Hi!
This is forward from lkml, so no, I did not invent this
hole. Unfortunately, I do not think lkml sees this as a security hole,
so...
Jamie Lokier said:
a)
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.26-19lenny1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-19lenny1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.26-19lenny1.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-19lenny1.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.26_2.6.26-19lenny1_all.deb
to
* Ben Hutchings [091024 20:15 +0100]
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 20:38 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
There is no trouble to be saved. We are providing the newest alsa
driver sources so that they can be build with whatever 2.6 kernel
you want.
Well that's nice for people who are using
firmware-nonfree_0.20_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
firmware-nonfree_0.20.dsc
firmware-nonfree_0.20.tar.gz
firmware-linux_0.20_all.deb
firmware-bnx2_0.20_all.deb
firmware-bnx2x_0.20_all.deb
firmware-intelwimax_0.20_all.deb
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 22:12 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
* Ben Hutchings [091024 20:15 +0100]
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 20:38 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
There is no trouble to be saved. We are providing the newest alsa
driver sources so that they can be build with whatever
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 552255 security
Bug #552255 [linux-image-2.6.26-2-686] linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: /proc
permission bypass
Added tag(s) security.
severity 552255 normal
Bug #552255 [linux-image-2.6.26-2-686] linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: /proc
permission bypass
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 20:19 +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686
Version: 2.6.26-17
Severity: important
Currently discussed on bugtraq
Cut-n-pasting the email
Hi!
This is forward from lkml, so no, I did not invent this
hole. Unfortunately, I do not think
pkg-alsa-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Bcc:
Subject: Re: Bug#552203: linux-headers-2.6.30-2-amd64: alsa-source does not
compile against debian patched kernel headers
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: 1256416319.3916.309.ca...@localhost
Organization: LXTEC
* Ben Hutchings [091024 21:31 +0100]
On Sat,
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 23:15 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
* Ben Hutchings [091024 21:31 +0100]
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 20:38 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
No, we don't have to solve your problem. I'll be happy to take over
maintenance of alsa-driver if, as it seems. you are
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:31 +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
[...]
7) Steve Langasek to talk to Marco further.
[...]
Steve has been busy, so I've taken on this task.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The obvious mathematical breakthrough [to break modern encryption] would be
development of an easy way to
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 17:14 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I've drafted a policy based on what I believe to be best practice.
Please comment - is anything wrong, or anything missing? I also left
some questions in square brackets.
There is now one week left of the comment period.
Ben.
--
Ben
Hello guys,
I am trying to build a loadable .ko file for a Linux box with specific linux
kernel (uname -r result is 2.6.24-1-486) installed on it.
This Linux box contains no directory named /lib/modules/2.6.24-1-486/build;
and it contains no related kernel header files for its 2.6.24-1-486
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 18:04 -0400, Ye Deng wrote:
Hello guys,
I am trying to build a loadable .ko file for a Linux box with specific
linux kernel (uname -r result is 2.6.24-1-486) installed on it.
This Linux box contains no directory
named /lib/modules/2.6.24-1-486/build;
and it contains
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.31-1~experimental.2
Martin Michlmayr backported the CESA patches from 2.6.32 to 2.6.31 but didn't
enable them as module even though changelog indicates that
* [armel/orion5x] Enable CRYPTO_DEV_MV_CESA.
This is from the used config:
obstschale:/boot# cat
firmware-bnx2_0.20_all.deb
to pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2_0.20_all.deb
firmware-bnx2x_0.20_all.deb
to pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2x_0.20_all.deb
(new) firmware-intelwimax_0.20_all.deb optional non-free/kernel
Binary firmware for Intel WiMAX Connection
This
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 01:20 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 17:01 -0400, Arcady Genkin wrote:
[...]
Before
that, when we were testing the servers, the problem sometimes would
occur several times per day on each machine. The kernel has not
changed since end of August, I
We have been having a back and fourth on this with a couple of people.
It has not shown up on BUGTRAQ yet because it is sitting in the
moderator queue.
First of all, any permission bypass is bad. Principle of least surprise.
Second, the important thing here is that directory permissions are
On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 02:29 +, Anton Ivanov wrote:
We have been having a back and fourth on this with a couple of people.
It has not shown up on BUGTRAQ yet because it is sitting in the
moderator queue.
First of all, any permission bypass is bad. Principle of least surprise.
Second,
37 matches
Mail list logo
