Hi, I apologize in advance if this is the wrong place to ask.
I have a weird problem with a Debian testing (Wheezy) install,
gnome-settings-daemon keeps crashing whenever I boot with kernel 2.6.38.
With other kernel releases (2.6.32 and 2.6.39) I have no problem at all,
I initially filed a bug
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-3
Followup-For: Bug #620603
Today I installed linux-image-2.6.39-rc5-amd64 from experimental and
got the same black screen as with 2.6.38-3.
Is there anything I can provide to get this fixed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com writes:
Hi,
Here are some outstanding bugs/tasks regarding the ARM kernels:
#604013 base: ls -al on armel inside loopback mounted ISO image failes with
-1 ENOMEM
Nobody has been able to reproduce and the submitter doesn't respond.
Maybe ping the submitter
Andreas Horter wrote:
Today I installed linux-image-2.6.39-rc5-amd64 from experimental and
got the same black screen as with 2.6.38-3.
Is there anything I can provide to get this fixed?
Could you file a separate bug (since it seems you do not have identical
hardware to Ilmari), attaching
Hi,
I want and have to rectify my last mail:
This patch is obviously not applied in 2.6.38-bpo.2 because I get:
[5.924366] drm: Unknown parameter `edid_strict'
Could you get this applied to the next version of a linux backport?
Best regards,
Martin
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:29:27PM +0200,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 09:41:16AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
If you are able to reproduce this it would be very much appreciated if
you could test on 2.6.32-34 once it is uploaded to
stable-proposed-updates.
Thanks,
As 2.6.32-34 is now in stable-proposed-updates, I'm planning a test session
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 22:23 -0700, Will Set wrote:
Ben
Max
Julien
Kibi
Sven
I''m getting a segfault with Bug listed in dmesg, but different after
today's upgrade than it was yesterday.
I'm very happy to wait till tomorrow for a possible fix to be uploaded.
I'm also very happy to
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 13:50 +0800, Paolo Scarabelli wrote:
Hi, I apologize in advance if this is the wrong place to ask.
I have a weird problem with a Debian testing (Wheezy) install,
gnome-settings-daemon keeps crashing whenever I boot with kernel 2.6.38.
With other kernel releases
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Could you file a separate bug (since it seems you do not have identical
hardware to Ilmari), attaching dmesg output?
Done, it is bug #625727
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notforwarded 625279
Bug #625279 [linux-2.6] [regression] nouveau causes GPU lockup when upgrading
2.6.39 rc4 - rc5
Unset Bug forwarded-to-address
retitle [regression] Debian patches cause nouveau bootup GPU lockup with
2.6.39 rc5
Unknown
Hello.
Packages linux-headers-2.6.39-* in experimental are useless, since they
depend on linux-kbuild-2.6.39.
I do not use module-assistant, but I need kernel headers to build
third-party modules. If the only supported way to do it is to download
linux-source-2.6.39, then, possibly,
retitle 625279 [regression] drm-nouveau-Use-pci_dma_mapping_error.patch causes
GPU lockup on boot
thanks
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 22:19 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
I conclude that it is an issue with the Debian patches.
Mainline 2.6.39 rc5 plus the following patch to gives GPU lockup:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 625279 [regression] drm-nouveau-Use-pci_dma_mapping_error.patch
causes GPU lockup on boot
Bug #625279 [linux-2.6] [regression] nouveau causes GPU lockup when upgrading
2.6.39 rc4 - rc5
Changed Bug title to '[regression]
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Version: 2.6.32-31
I upgraded a machine from Lenny to Squeeze, and it failed to mount one
of the disks. Here is a large swath of dmesg from the failing kernel:
[0.00] Linux version 2.6.32-5-686 (Debian 2.6.32-31)
(b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc version
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:24:02PM +0400, Alexandra N. Kossovsky wrote:
Hello.
Packages linux-headers-2.6.39-* in experimental are useless, since they
depend on linux-kbuild-2.6.39.
I do not use module-assistant, but I need kernel headers to build
third-party modules.
I wonder what those
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #619433 (http://bugs.debian.org/619433)
# *
Package: linux-latest-2.6
Version: 2.6.32+27~bpo50+1
Severity: normal
the accept4 syscall is available since 2.6.28 - at least
for x86 architecture.
Support for accept4 on arm was added for 2.6.36 and the
patch is very simple:
commit 21d93e2e29722d7832f61cc56d73fb953ee6578e
Author: Mikael
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:24:17PM -0400, Andres Cimmarusti wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-15
Severity: important
Tags: sid squeeze
After recent updates, I can no longer successfully go into suspend moved with
this
laptop. The kernel log shows several backtraces.
Sorry for
Martin Teufel wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:29:27PM +0200, Martin Teufel wrote:
I installed this image yesterday and had the idea to test the
drm.edid_strict=0 parameter on it today. - It works like a charm. ;)
[...]
I want and have to rectify my last mail:
This patch is obviously not
Hi,
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:56:31PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
So that leaves us with a puzzle: does that mean that 2.6.38-3~bpo60+1
fixed it (forgetting about the drm.edid_strict parameter for a moment)?
no. Without drm.edid_strict=0 the error occurs (every 10 seconds ...).
With
Martin Teufel wrote:
Hm, I see (and agree).
So we/I'll wait for a fix from upstream.
I got back to drm_kms_helper.poll=0 for now.
Mm, I have read your report carefully enough yet, but: did you get any
response upstream? I would suggest filing a bug at [1], product DRI,
component DRM/Radeon,
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Martin Teufel wrote:
Hm, I see (and agree).
So we/I'll wait for a fix from upstream.
I got back to drm_kms_helper.poll=0 for now.
I have read your report carefully enough yet, but: did you get any
Erm, what I mean is that I have _not_ read and investigated your
I intend to upload linux-2.6 verson 2.6.38-5 tomorrow. This will
incorporate 2.6.38.5, which fixes numerous bugs including local
privilege escalation bugs in the agp driver (CVE-2011-1745,
CVE-2011-1746).
Let me know if there's anything I should wait for.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is
On 04/30/2011 09:49 PM, Steaphan Greene wrote:
On 04/23/2011 03:41 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
it seems you didn't followup in the kernel.org bugzilla. Is this fixed
in current kernels from sid or testing?
Testing on a different computer, just plugging it in with a clean boot
on the same
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
i was experiencing lockups on an armhf kernel built from the experimental
branch:
[2.644589] usb 2-1.1: SerialNumber: 1.0
[ 240.664217] INFO: task swapper:1 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[ 240.670509] echo 0
26 matches
Mail list logo
