Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
reopen 490293
Bug#490293: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: CONFIG_SMB_FS is not set
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
Version: 2.6.25-6
Severity: important
Hi,
My Dell laptop, a Latitude D610, no longer resumes with kernel 2.6.25.
During resume, there's some hard disk activity, but the screen never
turns on. I don't think that the system started normally (ie, that it's
only a
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:12 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:54:50AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
snip
Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge (from Xensource) and others can get the
important Xen kernel
新しいメールアドレスをお知らせします新しいメールアドレス： [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attn: Friend,
This is to notify you that your over due inheritance
funds $15.5M approved,meanwhile, a woman Janet williams
came to my office few days ago with a letter,claiming
to be from you,do reconfirm to this
office your full name and
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:54:50AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
snip
Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge (from Xensource) and others can get the
important Xen kernel features ported to pv_ops framework and integrated
into vanilla
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:42 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
I guess it was faster _now_, but they'll have to live with the forward
porting pain for years more now..
While this is true, the patches still allow for Debian to ship Lenny
without a feature regression in Xen support.
William
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:50:54AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
I've just committed a change to enable a patch (previously added by
maks) which adds suspend/resume and ballooning to the -xen flavour of
the i386 kernel.
The patch breaks non-x86 arches.
Bastian
--
The sooner our happiness
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:40:38AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:12 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:54:50AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
snip
Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote:
Thanks for maintaining debian's kernel packages.
hmm how is the bug you reported related to the kernel?
please ask such support the next time on the debian user
mailing list.
They're a remarkable technology in more ways than
one.
Here's
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:51:12AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:42 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
I guess it was faster _now_, but they'll have to live with the forward
porting pain for years more now..
While this is true, the patches still allow for
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
snip
Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge (from Xensource) and others can get the
important Xen kernel features ported to pv_ops framework and integrated
into vanilla linus kernels soon..
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
Version: 2.6.25-6
Followup-For: Bug #490903
I just did a boot with the SCSI-2 scanner disconnected and 2.6.25-2 boots
sucessfully in that configuration with the megaraid. I suspect it is the
SCSI-2 scanner
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
tags 490293 + pending
Bug#490293: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: CONFIG_SMB_FS is not set
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
tags 490293 pending
Bug#490293: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: CONFIG_SMB_FS is not set
Tags were: pending
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
snip
Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge (from Xensource) and others can get the
important Xen kernel features ported
versions
2.6.26~rc9-1~experimental.1~snapshot.11825
and
2.6.26-1~experimental.1~snapshot.11837
locks again.
But version
2.6.26~rc9-1~experimental.1~snapshot.11810
works fine (used for a few days without problems).
Marcello Nuccio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Chris Carr wrote:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92e
Severity: minor
When upgrading recently I noticed initramfs-tools give the following warning:
Warning: Busybox is required for successful boot!
... but it isn't. I shut down, and rebooted perfectly
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:39 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:32:55AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 10:57 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:50:54AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
I've just committed a change to enable a patch
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:39 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:39 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
s390 test build at least
-
http://stats.buildserver.net/packages/status.php?email=debian-kernelpackages=arches=subdist=kernel-dists
Thanks (that's a useful site to know
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:51:21PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
snip
Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge (from
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:32:55AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 10:57 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:50:54AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
I've just committed a change to enable a patch (previously added by
maks) which adds suspend/resume and
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:51 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
see relevant posts of Ian Campbell on d-kernel
You mean this?: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2008/07/msg00070.html
I think the situation has changed
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:39:09AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:39 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:32:55AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 10:57 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:50:54AM +0100, Ian
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:54:00AM +0200, Marcello Nuccio wrote:
versions
2.6.26~rc9-1~experimental.1~snapshot.11825
and
2.6.26-1~experimental.1~snapshot.11837
locks again.
But version
2.6.26~rc9-1~experimental.1~snapshot.11810
works fine (used for a few days without problems).
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:46 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:39 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:39 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
s390 test build at least
-
[Reply-To set to etchnhalf list to try and minimize crosspost noise.]
hey,
I'm e-mailing you because you are the maintainer of a module that
maybe a candidate for etchnhalf's linux-modules-* packages. Please
read through this message and let us know if you believe your module
should get
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:46:41AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:39 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:39 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
s390 test build at least
-
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:07:17PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
I've committed this patch since it's pretty trivial. I can easily switch
to the no-generic-changes version if requested though.
Seems to work now.
Bastian
--
Witch! Witch! They'll burn ya!
-- Hag, Tomorrow is
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:35:09PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:51:21PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:57:26AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:51 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
see relevant posts of Ian Campbell on d-kernel
You mean this?:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:23:26PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Like said, this thread was started to discuss about possible options of
getting xen dom0 support into lenny, and I pasted that git link to give a
status update of pv_ops work happening atm.
current best guess is lenny+half.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:23:26PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:57:26AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:51 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
see relevant posts of Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:35 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:51:21PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 14:11 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:11:06AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
Without dom0, lenny will be unusable for several installations of mine
which presently run an ugly combination of etch's dom0 and lenny's
kernel. I would like to
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:11:06AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
Without dom0, lenny will be unusable for several installations of mine
which presently run an ugly combination of etch's dom0 and lenny's
kernel. I would like to do that in a different way.
If we will not see dom0 in
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:11:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:11:06AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
Without dom0, lenny will be unusable for several installations of mine
which presently run an ugly combination of etch's dom0 and lenny's
kernel. I would
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:19:20PM +0200, Marcello Nuccio wrote:
What is upstream kernel version for debian kernel
2.6.26~rc9-1~experimental.1~snapshot.11825 and
2.6.26~rc9-1~experimental.1~snapshot.11810 ?
thanks,
Marcello
2.6.26-rc9, regarding the commits between 11810 and 11825
it
reassign 459573 linux-2.6
thanks
Sorry,
I asked for more info from the submitter but he never got back to me and
the bug report went off of my radar.
The kernel of the OP is pretty old, close at your discretion.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 02:02:36PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 459573 linux-2.6
Bug#459573: cpufrequtils appears to cause my machine to freeze
Bug reassigned from package `cpufrequtils' to `linux-2.6'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
2008/7/16 maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:19:20PM +0200, Marcello Nuccio wrote:
What is upstream kernel version for debian kernel
2.6.26~rc9-1~experimental.1~snapshot.11825 and
2.6.26~rc9-1~experimental.1~snapshot.11810 ?
2.6.26-rc9, regarding the commits
I experienced a similar problem on an Asus laptop : system freezes
completely after some random time (at least once after after some user
activity under X, once with no user activity, once immediately after
boot -- I could not even log in as root in the console, as the system
froze before I could
No problem here.
$ uname -a
Linux mandachuva 2.6.25-2-686 #1 SMP Fri Jun 27 03:23:20 UTC 2008 i686
GNU/Linux
ii xorg1:7.3+12
ii xserver-xorg-video-intel2:2.3.2-2
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile
915GM/GMS/910GML Express
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps
I think x86-64 xen patches are going in for 2.6.27..
Lenny will not support 64bit, no dom0.. so basicly lenny can only be used as
a 32bit domU .. unless people
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:53:52PM +0300, Teodor wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps
I think x86-64 xen patches are going in for 2.6.27..
Lenny will not support 64bit, no dom0.. so
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:26:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:53:52PM +0300, Teodor wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps
I think x86-64 xen patches are
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:44:00PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:26:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:53:52PM +0300, Teodor wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
See:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 07:54:01AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
These patches seem to break the build for me.
| debian/dfsg/drivers-net-tg3-fix-simple.patch
| debian/dfsg/drivers-net-bnx2-request_firmware-1.patch
| features/all/drivers-usb-serial-keyspan-request_firmware.patch
|
Hi Maks,
Thank you for replying quickly.
On 07/16/08 10:47, maximilian attems wrote:
[...]
hmm how is the bug you reported related to the kernel?
[...]
To be fair, I'm not sure that the kernel is to
blame.
It could be data corruption (I'm recovering from a
bad CPU chip), incompatible package
48 matches
Mail list logo
