On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:38:28AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Richard Mortimer ri...@oldelvet.org.uk
So that means that the kernel is complaining about type 54 which is
R_SPARC_UA64. That matches with the objdump output which doesn't list
R_SPARC_LM22 for scsi_mod.ko
Indeed, good
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:52:43AM +0100, Adrian Kieß wrote:
using 2.6.32-5 kernel (debian/testing) couses my xeon x3430 to crash at
bootup hanging on various unpredictable modules,
additionally if it randomly boots fine it crashes while running after
unpredictable time,
hanging again on
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:49:22PM +0100, Adrian Kieß wrote:
I attached a screenshot of the kernel oops as attachment.
Okay, GPF during module loading. This looks like faulty memory. Please
use memtest86+.
Bastian
--
Get back to your stations!
We're beaming down to the planet,
Hi,
On 15/01/2011 10:00, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:38:28AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Richard Mortimerri...@oldelvet.org.uk
So that means that the kernel is complaining about type 54 which is
R_SPARC_UA64. That matches with the objdump output which doesn't list
A solution for this problem that works for me (ubuntu 10.10,
2.6.35-24 kernel) is described here
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1612560
In a nutshell, add the boot option acpi_osi= to grub, by executing
$ gksudo gedit /etc/default/grub
(which calls an editor) to replace in the file
I contacted the Debian Live maintainers about this bug, who in turn asked me
to contact upstream. The aufs developers stated that the aufs version in
Debian Live is too old and obsoleted and should be updated, see here:
https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=26901616
I informed
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-23~bpo50+1
Hi,
Something like this was mentioned misplaced in #592497, and about a
different network driver, so I'm filing a new bug because it should
be unrelated to both issues over there :)
I've just seen something similar with a tg3,
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 14:26 +0100, Ronny Standtke wrote:
I contacted the Debian Live maintainers about this bug, who in turn asked me
to contact upstream. The aufs developers stated that the aufs version in
Debian Live is too old and obsoleted and should be updated, see here:
On 01/15/2011 03:29 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Daniel, please identify the bug fix we need.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2011/01/msg00093.html
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 15:36 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 01/15/2011 03:29 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Daniel, please identify the bug fix we need.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2011/01/msg00093.html
Well, we might as well just remove aufs then.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is
severity 607041 important
merge 607041 590321
thanks
Thanks for the information. Merging them.
// Ola
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 07:32:55AM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Hi Christian,
Your bug report is the same issue I've reported here -- actually a
kernel bug:
*
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 607041 important
Bug #607041 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64]
linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: amd64 ip6tables broken in OpenVZ VE
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
merge 607041 590321
Bug#590321: vzctl: ip6tables does not
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 14:42 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 15:36 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 01/15/2011 03:29 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Daniel, please identify the bug fix we need.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2011/01/msg00093.html
Well, we might as well
I can no longer reproduce this in 2.6.37. After the update to 2.6.37,
I commented out options i915 powersave=0 from modprobe.d and used
update-initramfs -k all -u. That was more than a week ago (probably
two weeks ago), and so far I haven't seen any corruption at all. I've
been switching between
From: Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:00:11 +0100
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:38:28AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Richard Mortimer ri...@oldelvet.org.uk
So that means that the kernel is complaining about type 54 which is
R_SPARC_UA64. That matches with the
Hello!
I'm also trying to install Squeeze on a LS-CHL (LS-C640L-EU) and can
confirm, that it still does not recognise the sata drive. I tried replacing
the modules with those found in
http://packages.debian.org/sid/linux-image-2.6.32-5-orion5x but the
situation did not change (of
I've just found out that the problem persists on kernel 2.6.32-bpo.5-686,
but not on 2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 15/01/2011 2:37 PM, cvel...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also trying to install Squeeze on a LS-CHL (LS-C640L-EU) and can
confirm, that it still does not recognise the sata drive.
I don't have this hardware and I'm not at all familiar with the relevant
kernel code, so I'm afraid there isn't
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 607227 src:linux-2.6
Bug #607227 [xserver-xorg-video-radeon] xserver-xorg-video-radeon: with kms,
screen flickers, without kms xorg eats 100% CPU
Bug reassigned from package 'xserver-xorg-video-radeon' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer
reassign 607227 src:linux-2.6
fixed607227 2.6.37-1~experimental.1
thanks
Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com (17/12/2010):
Marcos Marado mindboosterno...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup, just did one test: turned modeset on and booted with
radeon.new_pll=0 and the flickering is gone.
OK, this
reassign 358751 src:linux-2.6
affects 358751 xserver-xorg-input-evdev
forwarded 358751 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1786
thanks
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (21/10/2010):
Jeremy Nickurak jer...@nickurak.ca (28/03/2010):
Upstream bug should probably be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 358751 src:linux-2.6
Bug #358751 [xserver-xorg-input-evdev] tilt buttons are inverted with MX 1000
mouse
Bug reassigned from package 'xserver-xorg-input-evdev' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions
Hi,
(
For the record, more discussion followed on the debian-kernel list.
Ben Hutchings made[0] the discardable part explicit there:
By 'discardable' I mean that it would be possible to free the
memory used for its code and static data if it was not used
(similar to the way init
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 04:29 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
(
For the record, more discussion followed on the debian-kernel list.
Ben Hutchings made[0] the discardable part explicit there:
By 'discardable' I mean that it would be possible to free the
memory used for its code and
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 18:35 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
What shall we do with CVE-2010-4075, CVE-2010-4076, CVE-2010-4077
at this point of the freeze?
Should be fixed by d281da7ff6f70efca0553c288bb883e8605b3862
and 0587102cf9f427c185bfdeb2cef41e13ee0264b1 , but would change
the ABI.
From: Richard Mortimer ri...@oldelvet.org.uk
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:08:30 +
[ Frederic, Steven, Ingo, the short version of the story is that we
need to make it such that the _ftrace_events section is aligned
properly for 64-bit systems, and in particular that GCC can see this
too.
26 matches
Mail list logo
