Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-26
Severity: normal
I'm not sure if the bug is in top or in linux. top reports that galeon
(my web browser) uses 195GB of swap; that's far more swap than I have,
so not possible.
The only out of the ordinary thing I remember doing is hibernating and
resuming
reassign 628462 procps
quit
Hi,
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I'm not sure if the bug is in top or in linux. top reports that galeon
(my web browser) uses 195GB of swap; that's far more swap than I have,
so not possible.
The only out of the ordinary thing I remember doing is hibernating and
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 628462 procps
Bug #628462 [src:linux-2.6] linux-2.6: reports impossible swap statistics for a
process
Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux-2.6' to 'procps'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions linux-2.6/2.6.32-26.
quit
Stopping
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 617377 linux-2.6
Bug #617377 [linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64] Support for EFI booting on Intel Macs
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64'
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64' to 'linux-2.6'.
--
Stopping
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-34squeeze1
Severity: important
The system fails to actually reboot after the reboot command. Everything shuts
down normally, but the machine doesn't start up again. The only way to get it
to start is to physically remove power and cold boot the machine.
On 05/25/2011 12:54 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
i hereby request that:
* the release team overwrites the maintainers 'decision' to downgrade
#627837 from severity serious to important by marking #627837 RC
by restoring the severity to serious
* the release team makes sure that 2.6.39 does *not*
Your message dated Sun, 29 May 2011 12:22:45 -0500
with message-id 20110529172245.GB6574@elie
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: after last update fails to boot
has caused the Debian Bug report #626851,
regarding linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: after last update fails to boot
to be
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 19:18:29 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 05/25/2011 12:54 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
i hereby request that:
* the release team overwrites the maintainers 'decision' to downgrade
#627837 from severity serious to important by marking #627837 RC
by restoring the
On 05/29/2011 08:18 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Then work with the kernel team to resolve this, and make sure what you
need is ready in the future when a new kernel is released, instead of
making others chase external patches for you.
it has always been ready, that's not the problem.
--
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 20:27:31 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 05/29/2011 08:18 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Then work with the kernel team to resolve this, and make sure what you
need is ready in the future when a new kernel is released, instead of
making others chase external patches for
On 05/29/2011 09:53 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Maybe it was ready in your mind, but it wasn't in debian-kernel svn or
mailing list (and as far as I can tell the kernel maintainers even
checked aufs git before the .39 upload, and didn't find any recent
changes there). So yeah, that's exactly
On 05/29/2011 10:04 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
no; aufs.git was up2date. in time. way before.
oh.. and before you ask.. 'way before' means 'at least 2011-04-18, but
possibly even earlier' (yes, that really is a month before .39 was
released).
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3,
severity 627837 serious
quit
Daniel Baumann wrote:
oh.. and before you ask.. 'way before' means 'at least 2011-04-18, but
possibly even earlier' (yes, that really is a month before .39 was
released).
I don't see the value of this discussion --- it's water under the
bridge, anyway.
I'm
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 627837 serious
Bug #627837 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking
debian-live
Bug #627573 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.39-1-686-pae: Please include aufs in
linux-image-2.6.39
Severity set to 'serious' from
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 627837 wishlist
Bug #627837 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking
debian-live
Bug #627573 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.39-1-686-pae: Please include aufs in
linux-image-2.6.39
Severity set to 'wishlist' from
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 15:28:18 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I'm setting the severity to serious, even though I am neither part of
the release team nor a maintainer for the package. Either should of
course feel free to set it back.
The maintainers have already made that call, and I don't
severity 627837 important
quit
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 15:28:18 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I'm setting the severity to serious, even though I am neither part of
the release team nor a maintainer for the package. Either should of
course feel free to set it back.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 627837 important
Bug #627837 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking
debian-live
Bug #627573 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.39-1-686-pae: Please include aufs in
linux-image-2.6.39
Severity set to 'important' from
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:16:40PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 05/29/2011 10:04 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 05/29/2011 09:53 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Maybe it was ready in your mind, but it wasn't in debian-kernel svn or
mailing list (and as far as I can tell the kernel maintainers
On 05/29/2011 10:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
The maintainers have already made that call, and I don't see a reason to
override their decision.
so no change after squeeze, the release team gives a shit about breaking
debian-live, sigh. but don't worry, from now on, i will not care anymore
After submitting this problem to Kernel mailing list, I found a strange
(and even more curious problem).
I attempted to run both kernels on two seperate installs of Debian (both
6.0), but slightly different in packages.. One install did not have the
OOM problem, yet the other one did.. And
Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.netMay 29, 2011 5:18:27 PM
On 05/29/2011 10:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
The maintainers have already made that call, and I don't see a reason to
override their decision.
so no change after squeeze, the release team gives a shit about
Another quick update on this...
Something really really really strange has happened this time.. I just
did a completely fresh re-install (exactly like last time) and the
problem went away.
So, I'm going to build up the lxc / kernel support step by step (and
check for the oom_adj problem
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 22:04 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 05/29/2011 09:53 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Maybe it was ready in your mind, but it wasn't in debian-kernel svn or
mailing list (and as far as I can tell the kernel maintainers even
checked aufs git before the .39 upload, and didn't
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39-1+b1
Severity: important
Whenever I try to resume after hibernate, Debian 2.6.39 reboots instead
of resuming. When I built upstream 2.6.39 I didn't experience this
specific issue (I did get random other problems though). When I try this
on Debian 2.6.38 there
On 05/30/2011 04:16 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Is there a new canonical repository for aufs?
it always was http://git.c3sl.ufpr.br/pub/scm/aufs/aufs2-standalone.git,
like referenced from aufs.sf.net.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:
retitle 628547 breaks resume from hibernate with Linux 2.6.39
reassign 628547 virtualbox-ose-dkms
thanks
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 10:44 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
* One of the out-of-tree modules that I used with the Debian
kernel but not the upstream kernel, because I didn't install
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 628547 breaks resume from hibernate with Linux 2.6.39
Bug #628547 [linux-2.6] [regression] Debian 2.6.39 reboots when attempting to
resume after hibernate
Changed Bug title to 'breaks resume from hibernate with Linux 2.6.39' from
28 matches
Mail list logo
