On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 02:20:41PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> After we had discussed the new proposal a couple months ago and were
> left with severe open questions and concerns it seems that these have
> been ignored and the packages uploaded anyway, breaking APT's algorithm
> that
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:45:19 +0100 Julian Andres Klode
wrote:
> Source: linux
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org
>
> In https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040901 I asked
you
> to switch to an ephemeral key which was a misunderstanding from a
> discussion with
reassign 1064838 linux
thanks
Christoph
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 linux
Bug #1064838 [linux] New package names break APT safety features, ability to
co-install different ABIs
Ignoring request to reassign bug #1064838 to the same package
--
1064838: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064838
Debian Bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1064838 linux
Bug #1064838 [tech-ctte] New package names break APT safety features, ability
to co-install different ABIs
Bug reassigned from package 'tech-ctte' to 'linux'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1064838 to the
Control: reassign -1 linux
Re: Debian Bug Tracking System
> Processing control commands:
>
> > reassign -1 tech-ctte
> Bug #1064838 [src:linux] New package names break APT safety features, ability
> to co-install different ABIs
Please only reassign to tech-ctte after the actual discussion has
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 tech-ctte
Bug #1064838 [src:linux] New package names break APT safety features, ability
to co-install different ABIs
Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux' to 'tech-ctte'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1064838 to the same values
Control: reassign -1 tech-ctte
Control: severity -1 normal
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 02:20:41PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> In addition, this means that the ABI changes within the same package
> names, causing different ABIs to no longer be co-installable, which can
> have drastic effect on
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:12:17 +0100
Source: linux
Architecture: source
Version: 6.6.13-1~bpo12+1
Distribution: bookworm-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team
Source: linux
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org
In https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040901 I asked you
to switch to an ephemeral key which was a misunderstanding from a
discussion with xnox, which we still need to sort out fully.
Please either document how the
Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:26:05 +0100
with message-id <854480273.uh4nTMncRx@bagend>
and subject line Re: Bug#1064579: new git url for non-free firmware
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064579,
regarding new git url for non-free firmware
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 02:20:41PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Source: linux
> Severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org
>
> After we had discussed the new proposal a couple months ago and were
> left with severe open questions and concerns it seems that these have
> been ignored
Source: linux
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org
After we had discussed the new proposal a couple months ago and were
left with severe open questions and concerns it seems that these have
been ignored and the packages uploaded anyway, breaking APT's algorithm
that ensures the
It didn't work when I tried, sorry. Seems to be OK now.
Hi,
I also encountered the exact same scenario and the issue is reproducible
also on linux-kbuild-6.1. It seems that Debian Linux packages are
lacking things necessary to build BTF for kernel modules, like vmlinux
in /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build, as well as many eBPF tools included in
the
15 matches
Mail list logo
