On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 10:41:50PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 01:05:09PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > Salvatore Bonaccorso writes:
> >
> > > Ok. In the sprit of the stable series rules we might try the later and
> > > if it's not feasible pick the
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 11:04:23PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> At least to show where it breaks.
And I actually tried it and can not show the expected breakage from
missing /usr/include in the search path. gcc-13-cross builds fine with
only linux-libc-dev/6.7.7-1.
| -rw-r--r-- 1 bastian
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 12:47:07AM +0300, Andrey Melnikov wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Where are the linux-*-6.7.7-armmp packages lost? Nothing found on
> > incoming.debian.org and nothing present in unstable pool.
>
> See:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 12:47:07AM +0300, Andrey Melnikov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Where are the linux-*-6.7.7-armmp packages lost? Nothing found on
> incoming.debian.org and nothing present in unstable pool.
See: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=linux
linux on armhf has not been
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 01:49:24PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> The packaged gcc cross toolchain uses a sysroot during its own build
> still. As it is implemented now, it searches /usr//include, but
> not /usr/include/. So quite fundamentally, the Provides that
> we two agreed do break the build
Hello.
Where are the linux-*-6.7.7-armmp packages lost? Nothing found on
incoming.debian.org and nothing present in unstable pool.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1064035 + patch
Bug #1064035 [linux-doc-5.10] Missing documentation due to error in kernel-doc
script
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1064035:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 01:05:09PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Salvatore Bonaccorso writes:
>
> > Ok. In the sprit of the stable series rules we might try the later and
> > if it's not feasible pick the first variant?
>
> Well, "the spirit of the stable series" is one of Greg's titles,
Hi Bastian,
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 12:30:09PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 12:07:15PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 04.03.24 11:29, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 08:53:11AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > However the links in
Salvatore Bonaccorso writes:
> Ok. In the sprit of the stable series rules we might try the later and
> if it's not feasible pick the first variant?
Well, "the spirit of the stable series" is one of Greg's titles, and he
said either was good...:)
jon
Hi Jonathan,
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 06:39:26AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Salvatore Bonaccorso writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ben Hutchings reported in https://bugs.debian.org/1064035 a problem
> > with the kernel-doc builds once 3080ea5553cc ("stddef: Introduce
> > DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY()
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1065416 [linux-libc-dev] linux-libc-dev claims to provide
linux-libc-dev-ARCH-cross, but it doesn't do that completely
Bug #1059786 [linux-libc-dev] cross-toolchain-base: Migrating linux-libc-dev
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 08:53:11AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> linux-libc-dev claims to provide linux-libc-dev-ARCH-cross, but it doesn't
> do that completely
> However the links in /usr/DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE/include are missing.
So you claim that
Salvatore Bonaccorso writes:
> Hi,
>
> Ben Hutchings reported in https://bugs.debian.org/1064035 a problem
> with the kernel-doc builds once 3080ea5553cc ("stddef: Introduce
> DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper") got applied in 5.10.210 (as
> prerequisite of another fix in 5.10.y):
>
>> The backport of
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 01:31:10PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ben Hutchings reported in https://bugs.debian.org/1064035 a problem
> with the kernel-doc builds once 3080ea5553cc ("stddef: Introduce
> DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper") got applied in 5.10.210 (as
> prerequisite of
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 11:28:12AM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > But we where talking about kernel modules.
> There are kernel modules using BPF stuff? Never seen one, do you have
> an example?
No idea, but they get linked BTF information, so you could use them.
Bastian
--
Those who hate and
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 12:07:15PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 04.03.24 11:29, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 08:53:11AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > However the links in /usr/DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE/include are missing.
> >
> > Please be a bit more precise, there are no
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:32, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 12:40:07AM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Yes precisely, the bpf program source can just include vmlinux.h and it
> > should build and run as expected.
>
> But we where talking about kernel modules.
>
> Bastian
There
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - patch
Bug #1059786 [linux-libc-dev] cross-toolchain-base: Migrating linux-libc-dev
Bug #1065416 [linux-libc-dev] linux-libc-dev claims to provide
linux-libc-dev-ARCH-cross, but it doesn't do that completely
Removed tag(s) patch.
Removed tag(s) patch.
--
Control: tags -1 - patch
The headers have to be provided in the /usr//include location.
Currently, that is not possible, because linux-libc-dev provides the
linux-libc-dev-cross-* packages, without providing these headers in the
old locations.
The assumption to include the headers for the
Bastian Blank (2024-03-04):
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 09:01:06PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Maybe have it marked Not-For-Us on armel, also requesting the binary to
> > be dropped there? And maybe poke the ftp team to have installer-armel/
> > cleaned up? (The “disabling daily builds” part
Processing control commands:
> unmerge 1059786 -1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> reassign -1 linux-libc-dev
Bug #1065416 [cross-toolchain-base] linux-libc-dev claims to provide
linux-libc-dev-ARCH-cross, but it doesn't do that completely
Bug #1059786 [cross-toolchain-base]
[ Remove -arm and -release }
Hi
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 09:01:06PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Maybe have it marked Not-For-Us on armel, also requesting the binary to
> be dropped there? And maybe poke the ftp team to have installer-armel/
> cleaned up? (The “disabling daily builds” part
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 09:52:14AM +0100, Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
> Gianluca Renzi wrote:
> > The same here. We never used the d-i but we are using Debian systems
> > (kernel and root file system) as daily bases of our line of products
> > embedded systems. Hundred of thousands of boards are
On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 12:40:07AM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Yes precisely, the bpf program source can just include vmlinux.h and it
> should build and run as expected.
But we where talking about kernel modules.
Bastian
--
Vulcans never bluff.
-- Spock, "The Doomsday
Your message dated Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:31:38 +0100
with message-id <20240304103138.jvussu4gqb2zv...@shell.thinkmo.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#1064838: New package names break APT safety features,
ability to co-install different ABIs
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064838,
regarding New package
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 cross-toolchain-base
Bug #1065416 [linux-libc-dev] linux-libc-dev claims to provide
linux-libc-dev-ARCH-cross, but it doesn't do that completely
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-libc-dev' to 'cross-toolchain-base'.
No longer marked as found in
Control: reassign -1 cross-toolchain-base
Control: forcemerge 1059786 -1
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 08:53:11AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> linux-libc-dev claims to provide linux-libc-dev-ARCH-cross, but it doesn't
> do that completely
This is #1059786. This lacks a response from you. So I'm
As per the discussion in
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1005 - once
vmlinux.h is included with linux-headers, the warning about cmd_btf_ko etc.
should be harmless, as that file should already be available (ie: there's
no need to generate it again as part of kernel
Hi Salvatore
Le 03/03/2024 à 16:25, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit :
Ok that is great to hear. So firstmost: Then this iwill be fixed in
the next upload for bookworm, as we do a rebase to at least 6.1.80.
Alternatively if we know which was the fixing commit that would be
helpful as well now,
Gianluca Renzi wrote:
> The same here. We never used the d-i but we are using Debian systems (kernel
> and root file system) as daily bases of our line of products embedded
> systems. Hundred of thousands of boards are using Debian since Debian Lenny
> 5.0. From armel to armhf 32 bit systems.
>
31 matches
Mail list logo
