Bug#341761: [PATCH] PCI hotplug: Be slightly quieter about shpc_cap_offset == 0

2005-12-22 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 01:17:36PM +0900, Horms wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Severity: minor I'm booting using the quiet kernel option. During the synthesizing of the initial hotplug events, I see the following messages show up: shpchp:

Re: [patch, attach, RFC] usb-serial: ti_usb removing firmware

2006-12-14 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:10:46PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: Hallo. Due to very big distance to my usual work stand, please accept this. Hm, I don't think this driver is orphaned. Please work with Al to get this accepted through him, I'll have to wait for his ACK on it. thanks, greg k-h --

Bug#486798: [PATCH] restore export of handle_mm_fault for Mac on Linux

2008-06-19 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 01:46:57PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:58:05AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: There is an effort underway to bring the MOL kernel modules into a mergeable form. But it's not there yet. Joseph Jezak, the MOl main developer nowdays is working

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-04 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 04:16:47PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: This is just the followup on said discussion, involving the larger LKML audience, in order to get this fixed for good. As said, it is just a mere technicality to get out of the muddy situation, all the people having contributed

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-04 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 09:05:18PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Apr 04, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What if we don't want to do so? I know I personally posted a solution Then probably the extremists in Debian will manage to kill your driver, like they did with tg3 and others

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-04 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan firmware, right ? http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/04/msg00145.html Can you summarize the conclusion of the thread, or what you did get from it, please ? That

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

2006-08-28 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 02:35:26AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: Sven Luther wrote: On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:11:42PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: I've tested this with the aic94xx driver using the new MODULE_FIRMWARE() tag. Initramfs should be much easier because it already includes most of

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

2006-08-28 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:15:49AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: James Bottomley wrote: On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 02:35 +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: request_firmware() is dead also. YMMV, but three years, and there are still big chunks of binary in kernel. And please don't add new useless info _in_

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

2006-08-28 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:14:30AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:51:03PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:15:49AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: request_firmware() is dead also. YMMV, but three years, and there are still big chunks of binary in kernel

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

2006-08-29 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:46:45AM -0700, David Lang wrote: On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Greg KH wrote: I think the current way we handle firmware works quite well, especially given the wide range of different devices that it works for (everything from BIOS upgrades to different wireless driver

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

2006-08-29 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:42:56PM -0700, David Lang wrote: besides, several kernel versions ago this used to work. the current requirement is a regression as far as the user is concerned. Then go bug the driver authors please :) thanks, greg k-h -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: major 442

2006-10-25 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:20:30PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: I just installed the Debian 2.6.18 kernel package and I noticed that it repeatedly tries to load a major 442 module alias, which appears to be used by the usb_endpoint devices. Does anybody know why? I am not even using the USB

Bug#333136: udev doesn't load cdc-acm when USB modem plugs

2005-10-12 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:15:49AM -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote: Package: udev Version: 0.070-3 Severity: normal In hotplug days, connecting a USB modem (in my case, a Motorola GSM phone) would automatically trigger loading of the cdc-acm module. It's now necessary to modprobe cdc-acm

Bug#551312: [stable] [PATCH] HID: remove TENX iBuddy from blacklist

2010-03-08 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:25:58AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:26:33AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: Please let me know when it hits Linus's tree and what the git commit id is for it then. I believe http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6

Bug#565857: [stable] support KAIREN's USB VGA adaptor

2010-03-09 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:21:12PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:59:19AM +0900, Tanaka Akira wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64 Version: 2.6.26-19lenny2 Hi. I found that KAIREN's USB VGA Adaptor (USB20SVGA-MB-PLUS) doesn't work. It is

Bug#573950: 8192 driver

2010-03-18 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:10:52PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 14:03 +1100, Geoff Simmons wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:19:29AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: I'm sorry but I can't find the firmware for this anywhere. It is available in Greg Kroah-Hartman's

Bug#565790: [stable] [ltp] Re: Bug#565790: cat /proc/acpi/ibm/video and must press power button

2010-03-18 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 05:29:42PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Tue, 09 Mar 2010, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:53:57PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: go reading /proc/acpi/ibm/video every

Bug#575726: [088/116] rt2860sta: Fix argument to linux_pci_unmap_single()

2010-03-30 Thread Greg KH
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk John Halton wrote in http://bugs.debian.org/575726: Whenever wpa_supplicant is deactivated (whether by killing the process or during a normal shutdown) I

Re: Debian extra modules

2009-10-05 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 04:58:15PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: As discussed at LPC, Debian currently has the following extra modules: aufs2 - A union filesystem implementation; used by the Debian and Ubuntu live CDs. The 'standalone' (modular) version could be a candidate for

Bug#563313: [165/197] ACPI: EC: Allow multibyte access to EC

2010-04-22 Thread Greg KH
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Alexey Starikovskiy astarikovs...@suse.de commit dadf28a10c3eb29421837a2e413ab869ebd upstream http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14667 [bwh: Backport to 2.6.32; same applies to

Bug#563313: [119/139] ACPI: EC: Allow multibyte access to EC

2010-04-22 Thread Greg KH
2.6.33-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Alexey Starikovskiy astarikovs...@suse.de commit dadf28a10c3eb29421837a2e413ab869ebd upstream http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14667 [bwh: Backport to 2.6.32; same applies to

Bug#563313: [165/197] ACPI: EC: Allow multibyte access to EC

2010-04-22 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:59:16PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Greg KH wrote: From: Alexey Starikovskiy astarikovs...@suse.de commit dadf28a10c3eb29421837a2e413ab869ebd upstream Hmm. Doesn't this need commit 2060c44576c79086ff24718878d7edaa7384a985 to fix

Bug#578129: [stable] please apply skip sense logging for some ATA PASS-THROUGH cdbs from 2.6.33

2010-05-07 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:27:56PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Robert Edmonds wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-11 Severity: normal Tags: patch hi, when SATA drives are attached to SAS controllers and used in ATA pass-through mode, many operations cause alarming

Re: Reverts needed for 2.6.32.x ia64 percpu usage

2010-06-01 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:36:20AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: Hi Greg, Pinging for a revert request for 2.6.32.x. It seems like we had a misunderstanding about exactly which patches should be reverted. The email below explains precisely which commits should be reverted from the

Re: 2.6.32-stable percpu fixes

2010-06-01 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:18:58PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: * Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk) wrote: These commits included in 2.6.32.12: ea0a09acd81c6d52c77d80f0d4089795df7bcb58 modules: fix incorrect percpu usage d150a2b96558a7349cbf3a72a279c37bc67d50fb module: fix

Re: [Stable-review] Reverts needed for 2.6.32.x ia64 percpu usage

2010-06-01 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 05:32:33PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:41:34AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:36:20AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: Hi Greg, Pinging for a revert request for 2.6.32.x. It seems like we had a misunderstanding

Bug#584945: [PATCH 1/2] Staging: rtl8192s_usb: Fix device ID table

2010-06-22 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:00:35AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: The rtl8192s_usb driver was claiming a number of device IDs which are actually supported by the code in the rtl8192u_usb driver. Remove them from rtl8192s_usb, and add more device IDs as listed in the vendor driver version

Bug#586558: [stable] [PATCH] Btrfs: should add a permission check for setfacl

2010-06-25 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 06:30:21PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: This was commit 2f26afba46f0ebf155cf9be746496a0304a5b7cf. now queued up. thanks, greg k-h -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#586558: [stable] [PATCH] Btrfs: should add a permission check for setfacl

2010-06-26 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 06:47:05AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 03:47:05PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 06:30:21PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: This was commit 2f26afba46f0ebf155cf9be746496a0304a5b7cf. now queued up. Whoops, sorry. I mixed

Bug#586558: [stable] [PATCH] Btrfs: should add a permission check for setfacl

2010-06-30 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 01:48:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 09:55:47AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 06:47:05AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 03:47:05PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 06:30:21PM +0200

Bug#592187: [stable] Bug#576838: virtio network crashes again

2010-08-19 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 09:37:34AM +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote: Hi Ben, Greg, I was finally able to identify the patch series that introduced the fix (they were introduced to -stable in 2.6.33.2): cb63112 net: add __must_check to sk_add_backlog a12a9a2 net: backlog functions rename 51c5db4

Bug#592187: [stable] Bug#576838: virtio network crashes again

2010-08-30 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 03:59:57PM +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote: On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 09:32 +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote: Hi, I was finally able to identify the patch series that introduced the fix (they were introduced to -stable in 2.6.33.2): cb63112 net: add __must_check to

Bug#592187: [stable] Bug#576838: virtio network crashes again

2010-08-30 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 09:46:36AM -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Greg KH g...@kroah.com Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:50:17 -0700 As I stated above, I need the ACK from David to be able to add these patches. David? I believe there were some regressions caused by these changes

Bug#592187: [stable] Bug#576838: virtio network crashes again

2010-08-31 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote: Am Montag, den 30.08.2010, 10:21 -0700 schrieb Greg KH: On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 09:46:36AM -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Greg KH g...@kroah.com Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:50:17 -0700 As I stated above, I need the ACK

Re: Stable update of linux-2.6

2011-04-05 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:21:33PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: * dann frazier da...@dannf.org [2011-04-04 15:57:55]: On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 01:21:03PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: * dann frazier da...@dannf.org [2011-04-02 11:23:03]: 2.6.32.36 also fails to build on

Re: Stable update of linux-2.6

2011-04-05 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 08:41:50PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: * Greg KH g...@kroah.com [2011-04-05 07:08:30]: On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:21:33PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: * dann frazier da...@dannf.org [2011-04-04 15:57:55]: On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 01:21:03PM +0530

Re: Stable update of linux-2.6

2011-04-05 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:56:52PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: Resending the patch with commit id and message included. Please let me know, incase the patch needs any other changes to be made. What is the proper Subject: of this patch? powerpc: Fix

Re: [PATCH 0/2] powerpc/kexec build failure fixes

2011-04-06 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 06:28:49PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: Hi Greg, Can you please pull the powerpc build failure fixes patch series into 2.6.32-stable. No, I don't pull any patches into a stable tree. Especially as you didn't even give me a git tree to pull from :) I'll take

[57/74] powerpc/kexec: Add ifdef CONFIG_PPC_STD_MMU_64 to PPC64 code

2011-04-13 Thread Greg KH
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Kamalesh Babulal kamal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com powerpc/kexec: Add ifdef CONFIG_PPC_STD_MMU_64 to PPC64 code This patch introduces PPC64 specific #ifdef bits from the upstream commit:

[58/74] powerpc: Fix default_machine_crash_shutdown #ifdef botch

2011-04-13 Thread Greg KH
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Kamalesh Babulal kamal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com powerpc: Fix default_machine_crash_shutdown #ifdef botch Commit: c2be05481f6125254c45b78f334d4dd09c701c82 upstream crash_kexec_wait_realmode()

[55/71] powerpc/kexec: Add ifdef CONFIG_PPC_STD_MMU_64 to PPC64 code

2011-04-13 Thread Greg KH
2.6.33-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Kamalesh Babulal kamal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com powerpc/kexec: Add ifdef CONFIG_PPC_STD_MMU_64 to PPC64 code This patch introduces PPC64 specific #ifdef bits from the upstream commit:

[56/71] powerpc: Fix default_machine_crash_shutdown #ifdef botch

2011-04-13 Thread Greg KH
2.6.33-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Kamalesh Babulal kamal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com powerpc: Fix default_machine_crash_shutdown #ifdef botch Commit: c2be05481f6125254c45b78f334d4dd09c701c82 upstream crash_kexec_wait_realmode()

Bug#617364: [stable] Bug#617364: linux-2.6: lseek() over NFS is returning an incorrect file length under some, circumstances

2011-04-22 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:28:22PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Could you check back with Joe Conway and ask for commits IDs of the upstream fixes? I've got the following info from Trond Myklebust: The upstream fix is commit 27dc1cd3ad9300f81e1219e5fc305d91d85353f8 (NFS:

Bug#607416: [stable] Device table incorrect for drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c: 3880/3390 should be 3880/3380

2011-04-24 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 09:10:19AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 23:09:50 -0400 (EDT), Jonathan Nieder wrote: If you run git log dd30ac3 --grep='dasd: correct device table', then the fix will show up: commit 5da24b7627ff821e154a3aaecd5d60e1d8e228a5 Author:

Bug#617508: [stable] Bug#617508: patch available

2011-05-04 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:14:36PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Rik Theys wrote: On 04/15/2011 05:49 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: Please consider adding this patch to a ((old)stable) kernel update. I don't think this is sufficiently critical for an oldstable update. For stable, yes,

Bug#538410: [stable] atl1c: ethernet broken on Eee PC model 1005HA-H

2009-08-05 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:37:32PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Hi Greg, On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:58:36PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 01:39:55PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 Version: 2.6.30-3 Severity: normal

Bug#550898: [stable] Appeal to backport dasd_diag fix to stable update for 2.6.32

2010-01-04 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:26:38AM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote: Hello upstream kernel team! A fix was recently published for drivers/s390/block/dasd_diag.c to fix a problem with an inability to get read-only minidisks online to Linux via the dasd_diag driver. This fix was published for

Bug#551312: [stable] [PATCH] HID: remove TENX iBuddy from blacklist

2010-01-26 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:37:57AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: This was commit 4bb950806f10bc3e249dd34375b4a4d6bfc0 upstream. I don't see that commit id, or the patch below, in Linus's tree yet. Did something get out of sync? confused, greg k-h From

Bug#551312: [stable] Unitech barcode fix from linux-next git

2010-01-26 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 07:23:38PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 05:06:36PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Linux-next commit 4bb950806f10bc3e249dd34375b4a4d6bfc0

Bug#551312: [stable] [PATCH] HID: remove TENX iBuddy from blacklist

2010-01-26 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 08:22:31PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:06:56AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:37:57AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: This was commit 4bb950806f10bc3e249dd34375b4a4d6bfc0 upstream. I don't see that commit id

Bug#567747: [stable] (fwd) drm/i915: Fix DDC on some systems by clearing BIOS GMBUS setup.

2010-02-11 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 11:48:58AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: we have a report that this fix is need for mac mini http://bugs.debian.org/567747 could you please apply belows to 2.6.32 Now queued up, thanks. gre k-h -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#566726: [stable] (fwd) Staging: fix rtl8187se compilation errors with mac80211

2010-02-12 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 04:07:30PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: please apply belows straight forward fix to 2.6.32 stable, applies without fuzz. we had a user complaining that his .config no longer compiles on 2.6.32, verified that said config compiles with this fix

Bug#594845: [stable] [PATCH] tun: Don't add sysfs attributes to devices without sysfs directories

2010-09-08 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 05:21:16AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Prior to Linux 2.6.35, net devices outside the initial net namespace did not have sysfs directories. Attempting to add attributes to them will trigger a BUG(). Reported-and-tested-by: Russell Stuart russell-deb...@stuart.id.au

Bug#594845: [037/123] tun: Dont add sysfs attributes to devices without sysfs directories

2010-09-18 Thread Greg KH
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk This applies to 2.6.32 *only*. It has not been applied upstream since the limitation no longer exists. Prior to Linux 2.6.35, net devices outside the initial net namespace did not have sysfs directories. Attempting to add attributes to them will trigger

Bug#584784: [61/68] MIPS: Set io_map_base for several PCI bridges lacking it

2010-09-24 Thread Greg KH
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk commit 8faf2e6c201d95b780cd3b4674b7a55ede6dcbbb upstream. Several MIPS platforms don't set pci_controller::io_map_base for their PCI bridges. This results

Bug#600155: [50/66] r6040: Fix multicast list iteration when hash filter is used

2010-10-22 Thread Greg KH
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk This was fixed in mainline by the interface change made in commit f9dcbcc9e338d08c0f7de7eba4eaafbbb7f81249. After walking the multicast list to set up the

Bug#600155: [11/17] r6040: Fix multicast list iteration when hash filter is used

2010-10-22 Thread Greg KH
2.6.27-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk This was fixed in mainline by the interface change made in commit f9dcbcc9e338d08c0f7de7eba4eaafbbb7f81249. After walking the multicast list to set up the

Bug#600155: [11/17] r6040: Fix multicast list iteration when hash filter is used

2010-10-22 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 08:13:27PM +0100, Jack Stone wrote: On 22/10/2010 19:39, Greg KH wrote: drivers/net/r6040.c |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- a/drivers/net/r6040.c +++ b/drivers/net/r6040.c @@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ static void r6040_multicast_list(struct

Re: [PATCH 2/3] econet: Move to staging

2010-11-24 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 03:52:28AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: Recent review has revealed several bugs in obscure protocol implementations that can be exploited by local users for denial of service or privilege escalation. The econet protocol (PF_ECONET) is unmaintained. There appear to be

Re: [PATCH] econet: Move to staging; remove from defconfig

2010-11-27 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:44:28PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: Recent review has revealed several bugs in econet and other obscure protocol implementations that can be exploited by local users for denial of service or privilege escalation. The econet protocol (PF_ECONET) is unmaintained.

Re: [PATCH] econet: Move to staging; remove from defconfig

2010-11-27 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 05:26:44PM -0800, David Miller wrote: From: Greg KH gre...@suse.de Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:21:35 -0800 And I need an ack from the networking maintainer to be able to accept this also. I'm not applying this, nor do I want anyone else to. If people think

Bug#599368: [124/152] watchdog: Improve initialisation error message and documentation

2011-01-05 Thread Greg KH
2.6.36-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk commit 551423748a4eba55f2eb0fc250d757986471f187 upstream. The error message 'NMI watchdog failed to create perf event...' does not make it clear that this

Re: [stable] [2.6.32.y] radio-aimslab build fix

2011-02-20 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 06:03:59PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: hey Greg, Apologies if you've already been notifed of this, but the radio-aimslab fix in 2.6.32.29 introduces a build failures. Looks like we also need to grab: commit 2400982a2e8a8e4e95f0a0e1517bbe63cc88038f Author: Geert

Bug#618006: [PATCH 2.6.32.y] Input: bcm5974 - add support for MacBookPro8

2011-08-09 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:48:42AM +0200, Jonathan Nieder wrote: commit 4d4cf23cdde2f8f9324f5684a7f349e182039529 upstream. This patch add multitouch support for the MacBookPro8,1 and MacBookPro8,2 models. Signed-off-by: Andy Botting a...@andybotting.com Signed-off-by: Henrik Rydberg

Bug#618006: [PATCH 2.6.32.y] Input: bcm5974 - add support for MacBookPro8

2011-08-10 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:45:09AM +0100, Andy Botting wrote: Andy has the hardware, or at least had access to the hardware back then. I have the hardware too now, but I don't have time to run the tests. This patch is fairly trivial - but I can test it some time in the next few days if

Bug#618006: [PATCH 2.6.32.y] Input: bcm5974 - add support for MacBookPro8

2011-08-11 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 02:27:09PM +0100, Andy Botting wrote: Please do. I applied the patch to the 2.6.32 kernel by hand, and it loaded and detected the trackpad, but didn't seem to work. There were plenty of other issues with this machine, due to the lack of support for the new

Re: [stable] [Stable-review] Future of the -longterm kernel releases (i.e. how we pick them).

2011-08-15 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:09:02AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: I see that you've accepted Willy Tarreau's offer to take over 2.6.32.y, so if you could just formalise that before /. goes wild over the looming end of all the above distributions, that would be nice. :-) The distros were doing

Re: [stable] [Stable-review] Future of the -longterm kernel releases (i.e. how we pick them).

2011-08-16 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:26:24PM +0200, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote: I'd like to echo Ben's sentiment, particularly in the area of automotive. A car has to be supported with parts for at least ten years, often longer, and this includes the build system for the infotainment software. The

Re: [stable] [Stable-review] Future of the -longterm kernel releases (i.e. how we pick them).

2011-08-23 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:20:37PM -0700, da...@lang.hm wrote: On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Jeremiah Foster wrote: Do they need help from the community instead to help define, implement, and maintain this for them? I think the answer is yes. to expand on this a bit. it's a lot easier to

Re: [stable] [Stable-review] Future of the -longterm kernel releases (i.e. how we pick them).

2011-08-23 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:33:56PM +0200, Jeremiah Foster wrote: On Aug 17, 2011, at 00:33, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:26:24PM +0200, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote: I'd like to echo Ben's sentiment, particularly in the area of automotive. A car has to be supported with parts

Bug#630593: [PATCH/RFC] parport_pc: remove ancient, overeager quirk that disables EPP support on many chipsets

2011-09-15 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:33:18AM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: Hi, there's a bug in the parport module that have been reported (in another places) some time ago [1]. Also, this bug was reported at Redhat [2], but nobody follow the report and it was closed. As Adam baked said

Bug#630593: [PATCH/RFC] parport_pc: remove ancient, overeager quirk that disables EPP support on many chipsets

2011-09-15 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:41:14PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: Hi again, sorry for the noise and my mistake. The patch... there's a bug in the parport module that have been reported (in another places) some time ago [1]. Also, this bug was reported at Redhat [2], but nobody

Re: [m68k] partial success but does not boot: 3.2~rc7

2012-01-08 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 11:53:45PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 23:27 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 21:16 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: [...] • work and fail This is for debian-68k, linux-68k and debian-kernel: ARAnyM “console” output

Re: Linux 3.2 in Debian 7.0

2012-01-30 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:46:29AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: Greg, We've decided to go with Linux 3.2 for the next Debian stable release, so we'll be interested in a 3.2.y longterm series. I believe there was a volunteer from Ubuntu to look after that once you've had enough of it, but I

Re: Linux 3.2 in Debian 7.0

2012-01-31 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:46:02AM -0500, Pete Graner wrote: On 01/30/2012 02:51 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:46:29AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: Greg, We've decided to go with Linux 3.2 for the next Debian stable release, so we'll be interested in a 3.2.y longterm series

[patch 52/86] lockdep, bug: Exclude TAINT_OOT_MODULE from disabling lock debugging

2012-02-10 Thread Greg KH
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk commit 9ec84acee1e221d99dc33237bff5e82839d10cc0 upstream. We do want to allow lock debugging for GPL-compatible modules that are not (yet) built in-tree.

Bug#605275: EeePC 1005HAG still freezes when probing the builtin 3G modem

2012-02-26 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 05:38:46PM +0100, Maik Zumstrull wrote: Hi there, this is a re-report because not everyone loves Bugzilla. tl;dr: Because of a conflict on a TTY lock, opening the builtin USB 3G modem of the EeePC 1005HAG takes up to 10s. Previously reported as:

Bug#605275: EeePC 1005HAG still freezes when probing the builtin 3G modem

2012-02-26 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 06:35:43PM +0100, Maik Zumstrull wrote: On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 18:07, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 05:38:46PM +0100, Maik Zumstrull wrote: I don't see any long delay in your kernel log messages. The problem isn't visible in dmesg AFAIK. I

Bug#607574: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: wastes 8s of boot time on something USB related that fails

2011-10-17 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 07:57:09AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Version: 3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1 Jonathan Nieder wrote: Mario wrote: Version: 2.6.32-29 [...] [7.808651] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for :00:02.0 on minor 0 [ 16.409864]

Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree

2011-10-25 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:51:42PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: On 2011-10-25 18:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:38 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: This patch prevents the use of lockdep for debugging out of tree modules, which is rather mean. It was already disabled

Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree

2011-10-25 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:17:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:04:55PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:51:42PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: On 2011-10-25 18:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:38 -0400, Nick Bowler

Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree

2011-10-27 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:41:37AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:08:34 -0400, Nick Bowler nbow...@elliptictech.com wrote: On 2011-10-25 22:54 +0200, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:17:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:04:55PM +0200

Bug#649216: [PATCH] topology: Provide CPU topology in sysfs in !SMP configurations

2011-11-24 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 07:04:39AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: We should provide topology information to userland even if it's not very interesting. The current code appears to work properly for !SMP (tested on i386). Why, what will the topology look like for this? thanks, greg k-h --

Bug#650119: fails to boot on HP DL380 g4

2011-12-15 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:58:43PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: reassign 650119 src:linux-2.6 3.1.1-1 severity 650119 important # 6225da481597 (cciss: Add IRQF_SHARED back in for the non-MSI(X) # interrupt handler, 2011-11-28), which is part of Jens Axboe's # block/for-next tree. tags

Bug#650119: fails to boot on HP DL380 g4

2011-12-15 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:13:52PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:58:43PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Stephen, once it hits mainline, would 6225da481597 be a candidate for the current-maintained stable trees = 2.6.36, or does it have any

Bug#657078: patches to reduce the footprint of the nfs4 idmapper

2012-04-24 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:22:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote: Hi, I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug[1] on RHEL and also on Debian. I've noticed Fedora has started to ship an update with two patches that reduce the footprint of the nfs4 id mapper which should prevent this (or

Bug#659111: Regarding NFSv4: Save the owner/group name string when doing open

2012-04-24 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:04:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote: Hi, I'm experiencing the bug described in the Debian[1] and Red Hat[2] bug tracker. This bug seems to have been fixed in the 3.3 kernel with your commit 6926afd1925a54a13684ebe05987868890665e2b: From: Trond Myklebust

Bug#659111: [PATCH 3.0.y, 3.2.y] NFSv4: Revalidate uid/gid after open

2012-05-18 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 04:20:20AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: This is a shorter (and more appropriate for stable kernels) analog to the following upstream commit: commit 6926afd1925a54a13684ebe05987868890665e2b Author: Trond Myklebust trond.mykleb...@netapp.com Date: Sat Jan 7 13:22:46

Bug#704242: Driver for PL-2303 HX not working

2013-12-14 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 04:06:35PM +0100, Karsten Malcher wrote: Hello together, is there anything new for the PL-2303 HX? It would be fine if it could work like in the past. Have you tried a newer kernel in a while? A number of things have been hopefully fixed since June when you last

Bug#704242: Driver for PL-2303 HX not working

2013-12-15 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:32:33AM +0100, Karsten Malcher wrote: Hello Greg, Am 14.12.2013 18:08, schrieb Greg KH: On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 04:06:35PM +0100, Karsten Malcher wrote: Hello together, is there anything new for the PL-2303 HX? It would be fine if it could work like

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-05 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 11:56:43PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: so there's a lot of factors which i believe the linux kernel developers are not aware of, and haven't taken into account, and to place blame onto the SoC vendors for not working with *you* when *you* haven't made an

Bug#704242: Fwd: Re: Bug#704242: Driver for PL-2303 HX not working

2013-06-24 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:41:07AM +0200, Karsten Malcher wrote: Hello Greg, have you buyed one of this jinxed PL-2303 HX adapters? No, I have not been able to find one. Does anyone know where I can purchase one? Yesterday i got this interesting mail from Aric, who has analyzed a similar

Bug#704242: Fwd: Re: Bug#704242: Driver for PL-2303 HX not working

2013-06-24 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:41:38PM +0200, Karsten Malcher wrote: Hello Greg, Am 24.06.2013 18:17, schrieb Greg KH: On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:41:07AM +0200, Karsten Malcher wrote: Hello Greg, have you buyed one of this jinxed PL-2303 HX adapters? No, I have not been able to find one

Bug#704242: Fwd: Re: Bug#704242: Driver for PL-2303 HX not working

2013-06-24 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 08:37:59PM +0200, Karsten Malcher wrote: Am 24.06.2013 20:18, schrieb Greg KH: On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:41:38PM +0200, Karsten Malcher wrote: Hello Greg, Am 24.06.2013 18:17, schrieb Greg KH: On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:41:07AM +0200, Karsten Malcher wrote: Hello

Bug#704242: Driver for PL-2303 HX not working

2013-06-24 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:38:17PM -0400, Aric Fedida wrote: I will gladly ship you one. Give me address details, and I'll go to the post office to send it. I'll send it off-list, thanks. Personally, I have resolved to abandon the PL2303 chip, and move to FTDI instead. But for the sake of

Re: request for intel/igb backport

2013-06-25 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 02:13:36PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote: Hi Stable maintainers, I am the proud owner of a new Supermicro server mainboard that uses an LGA1150 socket and supports the new Intel Haswell CPUs that just started shipping at the beginning of June. The board has two built-in

Bug#751417: linux-image-3.2.0-4-5kc-malta: no SIGKILL after prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, 1, ...) on MIPS

2014-06-12 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:21:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 20:36 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Control: tag -1 security upstream patch moreinfo Control: severity -1 grave Control: found -1 3.14.5-1 Aurelien Jarno pointed out this appears to be fixed upstream in

Bug#751417: linux-image-3.2.0-4-5kc-malta: no SIGKILL after prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, 1, ...) on MIPS

2014-06-12 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 02:03:23PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:21:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 20:36 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Control: tag -1 security upstream patch moreinfo Control: severity -1 grave Control: found -1 3.14.5-1

Bug#751417: linux-image-3.2.0-4-5kc-malta: no SIGKILL after prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, 1, ...) on MIPS

2014-06-12 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:10:59PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 14:05 -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 02:03:23PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:21:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 20:36 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Linux 3.16.y.z extended stable support

2014-10-30 Thread Greg KH
maintenance where Greg KH left off with v3.16.7 [1]. Thank you, Greg. In addition to the Ubuntu 14.10 Utopic Unicorn release, the Debian 8 Jessie release will also be based on this kernel [2]. Since the regular support for Jessie will go beyond April 2016, after this date Ben Hutchings

  1   2   >