problems with latest smbfs changes on 2.4.34 and security backports

2007-01-17 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! I have discovered a problem with the changes applied to smbfs in 2.4.34 and in the security backports like last Debian's 2.4 kernel update these changes seem to be made to solve CVE-2006-5871 and they have broken symbolic links and changed the way that special files (like devices) are seen.

Re: problems with latest smbfs changes on 2.4.34 and security backports

2007-01-22 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi again! I tried to replicate the problem at home during the weekend with my laptop, but I couldn't get it to show links with previous kernels, so I guess I had something different on my samba server or similar, I'm at the real machines now so I have done the real tests and they look promising.

Re: problems with latest smbfs changes on 2.4.34 and security backports

2007-01-22 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
As you can see I now can see the symbolic links perfectly and they work as expected. In fact, this patch is working so well that it poses a security risk, as now the devices on my /mnt/dev directory are not only seen as devices (like they were seen on 2.4.33) but they also work (which

Bug#497796: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: kernel 2.6.26 hangs when using ipsec

2008-09-04 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 Severity: important I has a working setup for lenny with 2.6.25 but now that 2.6.26 has entered lenny I have found that the machine hangs. Even though I have spent a lot of time trying to isolate the problem I can't say much right now, the machines I started

Bug#497796: maybe solved upstream?

2008-09-10 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
I've seen that on 2.6.26.4's changelog it says: commit 464f8f4932d128a3e80402ec85d7c40c1f5e6899 Author: David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed Sep 3 01:03:39 2008 -0700 ipsec: Fix deadlock in xfrm_state management. [ Upstream commit 37b08e34a98c664bea86e3fae718ac45a46b7276 ]

Bug#582212: linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64: acpid doesn't get power button events on kvm (from stable) guests

2010-05-19 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-9 Severity: normal After upgrading from stable to testing the acpi power button signal from kvm doesn't arrive any longer to the acpid on this machine. This machine, the guest machine, works ok if I run the 2.6.26 kernel from stable (the rest of the packages

Bug#582212: Sorry, but I believe this bug was more of a misconfiguration.

2011-04-09 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
At least on my case I was blacklisting quite a few kernel modules on my guest of things I didn't want supported to save some memory, in the end it resulted that one of the modules (evdev I believe, I'll check it out for sure as soon as I have access to the machines, but I'm almost sure it was that

Bug#582212: Sorry, but I believe this bug was more of a misconfiguration.

2011-04-11 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
evdev is loaded and doesn't matter. I've set up several KVM systems without manual modifications, all the same. The problem is still present with 2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64. I'm afraid your problem doesn't have anything to do with kernel or kvm. If you do have evdev loaded then I'd say that the

Bug#640293: Similar problems on Compaq Presario C760EM

2012-01-03 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! I've been experiencing this lately, don't really know when it started as the problem is sporadic, it seemed to me that 3.2.0 rcs (tested rc4 and rc7) were worse on this than current 3.1, so after testing the 3.2 rcs I'm back to current testing linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64 3.1.5-1. The machine

Bug#654434: Kernel doesn't hibernate, instead you end up on a black screen

2012-01-03 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.1.5-1 Severity: normal Hi! This happens to me on three different machines, it happens with different kernels and doesn't happen all the times but only sometimes. The typical behaviour is that you get the two first lines of kernel's output when going to hibernate,

Bug#664605: Novatel Wireless USB 3G modem ID 1410:7001 no longer works out of the box

2012-03-19 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Source: linux-2.6 Severity: normal Tags: upstream It looks like http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=c7aa8f44b4d1dc73591894a2dd6909213612d299 broke this usb device which we had supported on squeeze and was broken after 2.6.35 and ever since. I'm

Bug#664605: readd back NOVATELWIRELESS_PRODUCT_HSPA_HIGHSPEED to option.c [patch]

2012-03-19 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! It looks like there was a mistake on Dirk De Schepper's patch commited by gregkh on 4 Sep 2010 00:33:40 + which can be seen here: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=c7aa8f44b4d1dc73591894a2dd6909213612d299 He removed

Bug#737023: BCM5708 with bnx2 driver shows lots of errors on packets.

2014-01-29 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Package: linux-latest Severity: important Tags: upstream Hi! I have wheezy installed on several servers wich have a BCM5708 based NIC, which uses the bnx2 driver and I'm seeing a lot of errors on the network RX packets, this happens wether the machine runs current 3.2 stable kernel or 3.12

Bug#737023: BCM5708 with bnx2 driver shows lots of errors on packets.

2014-01-29 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
I have wheezy installed on several servers wich have a BCM5708 based NIC, which uses the bnx2 driver and I'm seeing a lot of errors on the network RX packets, this happens wether the machine runs current 3.2 stable kernel or 3.12 unstable one, and with firmware-bnx2 coming from stable and

Bug#737023: BCM5708 with bnx2 driver shows lots of errors on packets.

2014-01-31 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
eth3 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:23:7d:30:9c:e6 inet addr:10.10.50.243 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::223:7dff:fe30:9ce6/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:36857

Bug#774461: Confirmation of the fix

2015-01-14 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! I've also been impacted by this bug and I can also confirm that Ben's kernel fixes it. Regards. -- Manty/BestiaTester - http://manty.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#858078: Still happens on 4.9.16

2017-03-26 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! As expected, this does still happen on the 4.9.16 kernel in unstable at this time. Regards. -- Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net

Bug#858984: More info on this bug, should we close it?

2017-03-29 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! I later discovered what the problem was when I tried to get my net up in recovery mode and couldn't load the right modules. Looks like somehow I ended up with a bad or nonexistant modules.dep or modules.dep.bin or similar, the fact is that the kernel modules were not loaded, this seems to be

Bug#858984: linux-image-4.9.0-2-amd64-unsigned: kernel radeon video driver hangs X

2017-03-29 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Package: src:linux Version: 4.9.16-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I have just upgraded from kernel on testing (4.9.13) to the version on unstable just to test it, the version on testing was running fine. The machine is running testing and is fully up to date with it. I had not noticed

Bug#858078: Suggested param works

2017-04-10 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! I have tested linux-image-4.9.0-2-amd64 4.9.18-1 and keeps on failing like previous versions. However after adding the parameter suggested by Steve Cotton it works perfectly, thanks for your suggestion, Steve. I hope this helps with all this, sorry for not reporting before, I think mail

Bug#900821: linux-image-4.9.0-6-amd64: apache reads wrong data over cifs filesystems served by samba

2018-08-29 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! I have rechecked everything again. Salvatore, I'm testing on an up to date buster running kernel 4.17.17-1 and I still see the kernel warning messages and the downloads are breaking and wget still shows this king of messages: 2018-08-29 13:45:31 (122 MB/s) - Read error at byte

Bug#911121: Please compile with CONFIG_SND_BCM2835=m

2018-10-15 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Package: src:linux Version: 4.18.10-2 Severity: wishlist Hi! I'm currently running this kernel on Raspberry Pi 3b without much trouble, however no sound devices are found, After reading and looking at raspbian modules, it seems that sound is handled by this module, so if you would please enable

Bug#856505: Patch sent to lkml

2018-12-12 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! After mailing Michael Zoran to see if he would be willing to submit the patch as it was on his TODO, and getting a reply encouraging me to do it... I have submitted the patch to the lkml: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/12/835 Let's see if I did it Ok and gets accepted, meanwhile, I think it

Bug#900821: vers=2.1 won't solve it

2018-12-03 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! I have tested vers=2.1 parameter on a current Buster installation and at least if the server is a Samba (samba as in Buster with a standard setup) the version of the protocol won't solve anything, the wget still breaks: Saving to: 'STDOUT' -16%[>

Bug#856505: Sound working on the pi3b with eHenry's patch

2018-12-06 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
I've compiled a Debian 4.19 kernel with your sugested patch to enable audio and reverting another one to fix the WiFi problem and I now have both audio and WiFi working. I'll send proper patches as soon as I have time, but it works. Regards. -- Santiago García Mantiñán

Bug#856505: This patch should solve the audio problem

2018-12-06 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! Based on eHenry's instructions I have created this patch which I have tested on Debian's 4.19 kernel now on experimental, where we have already enabled the sound driver which was not working. The result is that with this patch the sound is finally working, so, please apply this to the 4.19

Bug#915808: Current dtb for raspberry pi 3b doesn't allow wifi to be used

2018-12-06 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Package: src:linux Version: 4.18.20-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi! After kernel 4.17 the dtb for raspberry pi 3 b is not ok and thus the wifi is not found and cannot be used. Looking at the differences from 4.17 to 4.18 I have discovered that if you revert this single patch affecting only

Bug#856505: snd_bcm2835 included on 4.19 kernel in experimental

2018-11-29 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! This module is now included in the 4.19 kernel recently uploaded to experimental (linux-image-4.19.0-trunk-arm64 4.19.5-1~exp1), you can add experimental to your sources.list like this: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian ../project/experimental main However on my first tests this hasn't

Bug#911121: Please compile with CONFIG_SND_BCM2835=m

2018-11-22 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! > I don't have an rpi3 to test, but I wonder if it is really necessary to > enable CONFIG_SND_BCM2835 to get sound. After our talk on irc I thought you had commited this change, but a new version of the kernel has been uploaded and doesn't include this. What has happened? Regards.

Bug#856505: Bug#911443: linux-image-4.18.0-2-arm64: wlan0 no longer present

2018-12-30 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
> > >> And could we have the patch I sent on #856505 to enable sound on this > > >> machines applied as well? > > > > i assume you are talking about: > > > > arm: bcm2835-audio: Document the device tree node to enable > > bcm2835-audio driver > > > > This patch will not be accepted. For a

Bug#856505: Bug#911443: linux-image-4.18.0-2-arm64: wlan0 no longer present

2018-12-18 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
> I just added the commit from v4.20-rc7 that fixes this problem to the > Linux package git repository. It will be part of the next upload of > v4.19.x to unstable. And could we have the patch I sent on #856505 to enable sound on this machines applied as well? I sent this to the lkml as you

Bug#856505: Bug#911443: linux-image-4.18.0-2-arm64: wlan0 no longer present

2021-05-02 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
believe you can close this. Regards. El dom, 2 may 2021 a las 9:32, Salvatore Bonaccorso () escribió: > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 12:15:35AM +0100, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote: > > > > >> And could we have the patch I s