Hi maks
I wanted to time the new pre cached boot scripts when I read about
them, but no watch battery... Anyways, today I grabbed my old pocketwatch and
timed the boot. 45 seconds from grub-pc selection to cli login.
I upgraded both initramfs-tools and linux-image-2.6.32-4-686 than timed
#wodim --devices might show the correct /dev that is on the #lshw list
--- On Thu, 4/22/10, Javier Barroso javier.barr...@isotrol.com wrote:
From: Javier Barroso javier.barr...@isotrol.com
# lshw # cdrom output
*-cdrom
description: DVD writer
[sorry for the noise]
I haven't filed my own bugreport because it's not a big issue for me, ATM.
I'd rather wait the extra minute or so during boot, than change my disk maps
and menus...
I have a very similar dmesg ata1: lost interrupt (Status 0x58) - and the
kernel times out for about (30
http://wiki.debian.org/DerivativesFrontDesk
--- On Wed, 6/30/10, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc wrote:
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc
Subject: Kernel package for powerpcspe
To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Cc: Moffett, Kyle D
2.6.35-rc5-686 is loading without any errors.
at least without any errors that I can find...
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
I have a i830 also..
If you turn off KMS the old framebuffer driver works fine
obviously, this means 2.6.34 and beyond are unusable at this point in time on
the i830
although I did get the blacklight on in the terminal using 2.6.35 with KMS on
My Toshiba 1200-S212 i830 only has 8 megs
Ben
Max
Julien
Kibi
Sven
I''m getting a segfault with Bug listed in dmesg, but different after
today's upgrade than it was yesterday.
I'm very happy to wait till tomorrow for a possible fix to be uploaded.
I'm also very happy to file a bug if anyone wants to look at my old intel i865
Could adding a 0 to the rc kernel name reduce kernel upgrade issues,
without causing other issues?
- 2.6.39-rc4-686-pae
+ 2.6.39-0rc4-686-pae
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
After upgrading to 2.6.39-1-686-pae I have fewer boot attempts hanging.
Usually one or two before a successful boot.
It appears that if I downgrade udev one version (udev_169-1)
I get better results (at least with today set of packages).
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627019
Tue, May 24, 2011 5:18:21 UTC Ben wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 07:35 -0700, Will Set wrote:
Could adding a 0 to the rc kernel name reduce kernel upgrade issues,
without causing other issues?
- 2.6.39-rc4-686-pae
+ 2.6.39-0rc4-686-pae
The linux-version command can be used
Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.netMay 29, 2011 5:18:27 PM
On 05/29/2011 10:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
The maintainers have already made that call, and I don't see a reason to
override their decision.
so no change after squeeze, the release team gives a shit about
Stappers stapp...@stappers.nlTue, June 14, 2011 2:24:17 AM wrote:
[...]
I have the package kerneloops installed.
Yesterdag I had in /var/log/syslog these lines:
Jun 13 21:04:44 debian kerneloops: Submitted 1 kernel oopses to
www.kerneloops.org
Jun 13 21:04:44 debian kerneloops:
--- On Mon, 7/25/11, Frank McCormick fmccorm...@videotron.ca wrote:
From: Frank McCormick fmccorm...@videotron.ca
Subject: Bug#632734: Strange
To: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Cc: 632...@bugs.debian.org
Date: Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:09 PM
On 22/07/11 02:04 PM, Frank McCormick
On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 9:37 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:58:33PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:05:26PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:10:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
From: Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com To: Ben Hutchings
b...@decadent.org.uk
Cc: Debian kernel maintainers debian-kernel@lists.debian.org;
e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: e1000e update for
Tuesday, August 30, 2011 5:59 PM wzab w...@ise.pw.edu.pl wrote:
I found this bug, when I was looking for solution for my problem related to
the
newest kernels and a machine based on D865GBF motherboard.
I have two i865 mobos D865GRH, D865PERLK that both have trouble booting 2.6.39
and
Wednesday, August 31, 2011 1:22 PM Will Set debiandu...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627019
I have two i865 mobos D865GRH, D865PERLK that both have trouble booting
2.6.39
and 3.0.0 kernels
Yes
Len Brown suggested workaround
https
Monday, September 19, 2011 9:18 AM Michel Dänzer wrotew:
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 15:55 +0300, Tomi Leppänen wrote:
ma, 2011-09-19 kello 12:53 +0200, Michel Dänzer kirjoitti:
On Son, 2011-09-18 at 11:38 +0300, Tomi Leppänen wrote:
la, 2011-09-17 kello 06:10 -0700, Will Set kirjoitti
Saturday, January 21, 2012 4:17 AMJonathan Nieder wrote:
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com (21/01/2012):
After logging into GNOME, I started getting LOTS of
[ 239.494761] [drm:intel_prepare_page_flip] *ERROR* Prepared flip multiple
times
in kernel log repeated
Saturday, January 21, 2012 5:20 AMCyril Brulebois wrote:
[...]
a couple of my installs ( syslogs ) grew to several GiB`s
for the two weeks of so I noticed this page_flip spamming on my old
i865g stuff.
Back to the original topic: it is very difficult for Intel techs to
support old (and I'm
Thursday, October 13, 2011 9:06 AM martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Jort Koopmans jort.koopm...@gmail.com [2011.10.12.2143 +0200]:
In the mean while I've checked another solution; moving the call
to the local-top scripts till after the ROOTDELAY loop (within the
local file).
init-top/udev
Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:07 AM Jort Koopmans wrote:
Instead of patching this here and there with band aids, I suggest
that everyone with an interest instead invests time in testing
mdadm/experimental, which provides event-based assembly,
I was wondering what documentation the reporter
please re-read the reply to your wishlist bug report.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642066#10
Which is directing you to ask gnewsense project to submit their kernel changes
to upstream kernel.org
1:
Ask please, the gnewsense project
http://www.gnewsense.org/Main/HomePage
Tuesday, November 15, 2011 3:10AM Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi,
Will Set
wrote:
- you have tested some 3.1.0-1-686-pae kernel (I assume
3.1.0-1~experimental.1 from experimental).
Yes, 3.1.0-1~experimental.1 from experimental
- unless you add processor.nocst=1, it reliably hangs at boot
bridge
[5.837974] agpgart: modprobe tried to set rate=x12. Setting to AGP3 x8 mode.
[5.838116] IR JVC protocol handler initialized
[5.838325] agpgart-intel :00:00.0: putting AGP V3 device into 8x mode
[5.838540] nouveau :01:00.0: putting AGP V3 device into 8x mode
[5.838634
Saturday, November 19, 2011 2:32 PM Jonathan Nieder : wrote
forcemerge 627019 649304
quit
Hi Will,
Will Set wrote:
[Subject: processor.nocst=1 needed for 686-pae kernels]
You haven't described the actual symptoms here. I assume that they
are segfaults and hangs, as before?
Yes
Friday, December 23, 2011 6:54 PMJonathan Nieder wrote
Hi Will,
Will Set wrote:
I was able to take three pictures of the boot messages by scrolling up the
boot buffer from the login prompt, while booting 3.2.0-rc4-686-pae
to illustrate what I did my best to explain yesterday.
I'll
Monday, December 26, 2011 5:24 PMWill Set wrote:
Sunday, December 25, 2011 4:24 AM Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Will Set wrote:
Jonathan Nieder wrote
but the boot fails in some way unless you
add processor.nocst=1 to the kernel command line.
[...]
I had to test using 3.1.0-1-686-pae
Friday, March 23, 2012 6:42 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor
The only kernel boot parameter on this run was console=ttyS0,115200n8 --
i brought up the rest of the system by hand during this fallback
attempt.
According to HP,
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11632_ca/11632_ca.html ---
Friday, March 23, 2012 11:06 PMDaniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 19:51:37 -0700 (PDT), Will Set debiandu...@yahoo.com
wrote:
I know of 5 bug reports that confirm using boot parameter - processor.nocst=1
as a workaround for kernels 2.6.38
Thanks, i will try this the next time i
3.2.15 fixed for me.
3.2.15 fixed for me.
Pictures remove picture select.
Picture select next load new from where saved computer. Users nt place mouse?
Spelling spelled startrec are using can list. Plus or xtheme manager of choice
file.
Most cases may check see there readme!
WE HELP THE WORLD MOVE!
TRANSFORMING THE LIVES OF DEVELOPING
33 matches
Mail list logo
