plan to use this patch for 2.6.8, and attempt to backport it to
2.4.27. If backporting becomes overly complicated/risky, I'll revert
to using something like Horms' patch. I'll also see about getting a
CVE assigned.
Everyone cool with this plan?
Ack
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 10:28:10PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:30:19PM +0900, Horms wrote:
If you point me at the patch I'll be happy to rack my brains and
tell you want I was thinking at the time.
Thanks Horms, here's the link:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 09:28:14PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Moritz pointed out that this issue has been overlooked for sarge
updates so far. From my reading of this report, it sounds like our
best option for sarge is to incorporate Horms' patch for 2.4.27.
Does anyone object
because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- End forwarded message -
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
dh_installdirs: Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated.
dh_testdir
cd kernel-source-2.4.27; \
HEADER_CLEAN_HOOK=/home/horms/tmp/debian-kernel-test/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386-trunk/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386-2.4.27/header-install.out
\
make-kpkg --stem kernel
tags 344036 +pending
thanks
I believe that the following patch, which will be included in
2.4.27-13 and 2.4.27-10sarge2 trivially resolves this problem.
--
Horms
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/hermes.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/hermes.c
@@ -2312,6 +2312,8 @@ orinoco_stat_gather(struct
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:30:10PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Also this patch:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/diffs/fs/xfs/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|src/|src/fs|src/fs/xfs|related/fs/xfs/xfs_dinode.h|[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|hist/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
([XFS] Handle inode creation race) should also
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 12:26:27PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:30:10PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Also this patch:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/diffs/fs/xfs/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|src/|src/fs|src/fs/xfs|related/fs/xfs/xfs_dinode.h|[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|hist/fs/xfs
I have
added for inclusinon in the forthcoming 2.4.27-13 release.
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|src/|src/fs|src/fs/xfs|src/fs/xfs/linux-2.4|related/fs/xfs/linux-2.4/xfs_vnode.h
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
a solution to that problem,
as annotated in that bug.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=343970
I would like to use this bug, 344036, to address the missing ACCEPT
symbol in orinoco.o. I hope to post a solution to that problem shortly.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:03:38AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:24:51AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:51:52AM +, Horms wrote:
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh look, why are you still fighting
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:24:51AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:51:52AM +, Horms wrote:
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh look, why are you still fighting about this? It seems to me that the
real problem is that the via module doesn't declare
to me to be cleaner to fix
the underlying problem rather than adding increasingly nonsensical
special case code somewhere else to work around it.
Can someone cook up a patch for this and send it upstream and/or here?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
can be found.
Failing that, keep updating 2.4.27, as we already are for Sarge
security, and include that.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
) to keep doing this for 2.4. So if you have patches
for critical bugs, please forward them on - he can decide to drop or
keep them.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of
options duplicated in debian/arch/config. This patch removes the
duplicates and should apply cleanly against current SVN.
Thanks, applied.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'as'). It seems that there is a
problem between gcc-3.3 and binutils (at least for 'as').
Perhaps the bug should be reassigned to gcc or binutils.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to do some more builds, but doing all of them is a little
daunting.
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel-stats/kernel-avail.html
Also, if an arch should not be built lets start a list.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
-security-updates main
If you know of new security bugs, and they aren't in
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/patch-tracking/?rev=0sc=0
then send a note here, to the testing-security team, or
open a bug in the BTS.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
the Makefile.
Manoj,
being the extraversions expert, do you have any thoughts on this.
The current situation seems less than ideal.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about shpc_cap_offset == 0
It seems that the following message, logged as err() can show
up during normal boots.
See: http://bugs.debian.org/341761
Signed-Off-By: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/shpchp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/shpchp_hpc.c
was
on a lost laoptop and revoked. I belive that the new key
is in the keyring. If you want to drop by Tokyo and sign it,
feel free. Alternatively, I'll be at LCA2006 in Dunedin next month.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
concerned
code, which I sincerely don't have the time to do.
Current post-sarge kernels won't work on real i386 systems anyway,
since we dropped x86-i486_emu.dpatch.
M486 sounds reasonable to me.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
it myself, but of course I can't.
Richard.
I will put the follwing into svn which should effect the change.
--
Horms
Index: debian/arch/i386/defines
===
--- debian/arch/i386/defines(revision 4929)
+++ debian/arch/i386/defines
a bug against ALSA and
report any bugs back here (unfortunately bugzilla doesn't play well
with the debian BTS). James Courtier-Dutton recently posted
(to another bug) about how he would like ALSA bugs handled.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=338606;msg=15
Thanks
--
Horms
'
Latest ieee80211-source give the same result.
There is a known problem with the ieee80211 in Linus' tree being
out of date. Its slowly being discussed on debian-kernel.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/11/msg01215.html
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Mikhail Gusarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
H If you know more, please add your knowledge below.
[skip]
2.6.14-2 still enables the outdated ieee80211 :(
Fixing this is simply a matter of disabling CONFIG_IEEE80211. This
will allow to use ipw2200 (ipw2100
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:09:54AM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 06:51:44AM +, Horms wrote:
Mikhail Gusarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
H If you know more, please add your knowledge below.
[skip]
2.6.14-2
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: us-ascii, 15 lines --]
Horms wrote:
Holger kindly reminded me on IRC yesterday that its been
a long time since a new 2.4.27 was uploaded into Sarge.
He pointed out that there are a number of valuable
report_enum = hid-report_enum + HID_INPUT_REPORT;
list = report_enum-report_list.next;
That seems fine enough to me. Do you know of any side effects of
using this patch. Or do you considere it a candidate for inclusion
in a Sarge update.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
if there have been more than 6 seen in the
last 60 seconds, but (seemingly) randomly I will get DROPped on the
first connection.
Lets be quite clear, the ip_recent code is in dire need of a rewrite.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel Maximilian Attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 12:49:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 11:44, Maximilian Attems wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 06:22:17PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Ok, so I should just go ahead and put
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 12:44:29PM -0800, Dan Aronson wrote:
Horms,
I don't know why I didn't see it yesterday when I looked, but this
seems to be the same bug
as 316848. Sorry for making you reply again. I'll be even more careful
next time.
No problem. Just to clarify. You still see
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 06:37:57PM -0800, Dan Aronson wrote:
As I wrote, the in 2.6.12 the driver now reports that there is a BIOS
bug, but then recovers
and finishes loading, I haven't yet tried a device on it, but it does
show up correctly
in /proc/bus/usb/devices.
Thanks
--
Horms
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:10:05AM +0200, Colin Leroy wrote:
On 07 Oct 2005 at 13h10, Horms wrote:
Hi,
I took a look at making a backport, and it seems that
some of the problems are there, but without a deeper inspection
of the code its difficult to tell if the problems manifest
.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ralf Neubauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: us-ascii, 15 lines --]
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 12:25:11PM +0900, Horms wrote:
tag 340108 +upstream
[...]
As this is almost certainly an ALSA bug, could you take a few moments
to log your report
parties, please comment/revert
as needed.
--
Horms
-CONFIG_MKISS=m
Index: debian/arch/powerpc/config
Index: debian/arch/ia64/config
Index: debian/arch/alpha/config.alpha-generic
Index: debian/arch/alpha/config.alpha-smp
Index: debian/arch/i386/config.386
Index: debian/arch/i386/config.k7
Index
report. Its pretty easy to duplicate the bug
and reassign it if needed.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, I'm forwarding the patch you suggest to the IDE maintainers for
consideration. It seems to apply to current 2.6 head as well
as the somewhat ancient 2.6.8.
Signed-off-by: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c b/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
index 1e15313..e430717
previously using vga=... This can be
fixed by telling the initrd generator to load FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE
on boot, however as of -3 it is built into the kernel to avoid
this problem.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/#333522 which I believe is fixed
by installing module-init-tools 3.2-pre9-4
If pain persists could you please report which version
of the kernel, udev and module-init-tools you are using.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Horms and Maximilian Attems, how does your discussion relate to the
bugs reports you are including in CC?
I thought that Considering my previous comment, this does not seems
to be really relevant. was a polite, but clear enough, way to ask
you to stop
merge 339487 339485
thanks
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
This should be merged with 339487
(typed --body option rather than --body-file)
Merging as requested.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
's without a MIDI interface (but with OPL3).
Hi,
As this is almost certainly an ALSA bug, could you take a few moments
to log your report with the ALSA maintainers, as per the instructions
on:
http://www.mailarchives.org/list/debian-kernel/msg/2005/09177
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
tag 252289 +wontfix
tag 252289 +upstream
thanks
Is this bug reproducable with 2.4.27-11 and 2.6.14-3
(or whatever is the latest in sid when you read this).
I'm taging this as wontfix, as its assigned to 2.4.27 and
the chance of a fix not requiring a significant backport
seems remote.
--
Horms
different to the problem that I had.
Could you please post report to the upstream maintainers,
Vojtech Pavlik [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
CCing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
other than
occasionaly popping in on IRC. If I'm not deeply mistaken 2.6.14-3
is now out there, and was released using k-p 9.008.4. 10.00x seems
to be in pretty good shape now, unless something nasty is
lurking deeper in my INBOX. Manoj, please upload at will.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
to rebuild it from source. Horms, if you could point me in the right
direction, I'll give it a try.
That depends exactly what you want to build. To just make an image
for testing, upacking the tarball supplied by linux-source-2.6.14,
using the config that came with linux-image-XYZ in /boot
is at:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/11/msg00748.html
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for 1) as we do have a
mechanism, albeit a little tedious, to effect these kind of
dependancies. And in this case at least 2) shows us that
there is actually a slightly deeper problem that needs to
be addresses. I'd be surprised if we really end up needing
1).
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
snd_emux_synth,snd_seq_virmidi,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq,snd_emu10k1,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq_device,snd_ac97_codec,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_timer,snd_hwdep
soundcore 9696 1 snd
rtc12472 1 snd_rtctimer
Thanks
Waldo Cancino
--
Horms
be done.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-sparc64-smp'.
reassign 281511 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc32
Bug#281511: kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc32: kernel paging request oops
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc32'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc32' to
`kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc32'.
--
Horms
switch sparc from gcc-3.3
to gcc-4.0.
2.6.14.1 seems to need an ABI bump anyway, so go ahead.
How to handle these ABI changes for specific architectures?
We can't, and we never want to support that.
Agreed.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:07:24AM +0900, Horms wrote:
Yes and no. The problem is that basically we have two different things, the
first one is the build infrastructure, which should really not be all that
different for each version, and which
for this in dannf's patchdir
I assume someone has bumped the ABI for 2.6.14.
Now, who will be the first to tell us that about CVE-2005-2709 that
we already know about?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Horms and the rest of debian-kernel,
Al Viro has found another local DoS vulnerability in the kernel; one
can trigger an oops in sysctl. The fix is the only code change in
2.6.14.1 and has been assigned CVE-2005-2709.
Thanks, we're already
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 03:22:59PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 02:48:10PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Hi Horms and the rest of debian-kernel,
Al Viro has found another local DoS vulnerability in the kernel; one
can trigger
FRAMEBUFFER change should appear in 2.6.13-3.
Perhaps it will help.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and explore
what in there is broken, how we could be using kernel-package better,
and what logic might be best moved into kernel-package. I particularly
encourage this in the area of the headers packages.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
-space. I have CCed
the ACPI maintainers on this message for their consideration, including
your patch, which is below.
--
Horms
diff -r -u gnome-applets-2.8.2.orig/battstat/battstat_applet.c
gnome-applets-2.8.2/battstat/battstat_applet.c
--- gnome-applets-2.8.2.orig/battstat/battstat_applet.c
, which we have used before is there.
If we are going to release in the next few days, I'd rather
Manoj hold off. But if its going to be longer, then we probably
have enoughy scope to debug any 10.00X and get kernel-package
re-released before we make our relese.
Comments, please.
--
Horms
).
Thats fine, now we know that we must provide a .config to call
make-kpkg, whereas previously we were occasionally getting away
without it isn't a bit deal. Thanks for clarifying why maintaining
the old (not to specficiation) behaviour is a pain.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
- unless anyone has a better
suggestion?
Fine by me.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:19:36AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:31:10 +0900
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Waldi, can you coment on how to add
.
How to handle these ABI changes for specific architectures?
I think if you do it together, the easiest way is probably to do a ABI++ for
everyone.
I think that as it stands ABI++ for everyone is the only sane solution.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 09:01:24AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:26:17 +0100, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:30:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:19:36AM
code common is important,
isn't this something our version control system should
be doing for us with branches and merges? I'm concerned
that your approach adds extra complexity to achive
much the same goal.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:53:47PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:22:23 +0900, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Don't we need to handle the control file ourselves because we make
multiple make-kpkg invocations which all come
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
As a work around I am going to disable SOFTWARE_SUSPEND on effected
flavours, so far powerpc/miboot:
It seems that CONFIG_PM needs to be set for CONFIT_SOFFTWARE_SUSPEND
to compile cleanly. For startes, swsusp_arch_suspend needs
0xc02b2516: mov(%eax),%edi
0xc02b2518: test %edi,%edi
0xc02b251a: je 0x412b26b6
Signed-off-by: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c b/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
index d10d552..d3a4f30 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
with what it
says. But I haven't been looking into the module build problem much.
I really think we should focus our energies on finding a module build
framework that works for packagers and uers. Rather firing harsh words
at each other.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
. Can others comment?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from consensus on the issue.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to and
releases in the near future.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't do
that.
IF your are interested, that is covered on http://bugs.debian.org,
but breifly, CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] and start the message as I have above.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if it is fixed in 2.6.14-2. Is that
the case?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 09:55:56AM +0100, Harald Welte wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 05:39:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
I did some disasembling fun and games, and I'm pretty sure the patch
below will fix your problem. I'll fire of a build, I'd be greateful if
you could test it.
Sorry
/dash: can't access tty; job control turned off
#
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
race problems to me.
I stronly suspect so. A proposed fix has been incoporated into
module-init-tools 3.2-pre9-4, could interested parties please
test this problem against that release?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333522#msg132
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
for a standard
distribution.
Thanks, the suggestion above will be incporated into the next release.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:51:24AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Horms wrote:
I don't have a particular problem with disabling those drivers from the
build. But the d-i guys might. I've CCed them for comment (and dropped
the netdev CC).
No d-i udebs contain ipw2200 or ieee80211. The system
the best option is to get newer versions of these
drivers into Linus' tree. If there is any way that Debian can
help with that, then thats help that should be given IMHO.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for comment (and dropped
the netdev CC).
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the braindead Intel policies don't allow us to have an uptodate
driver in mainline.
Christoph,
do I take that comment to mean that upstream can't update the
drivers but Debian can? And if so, do you recommend updating
Debian's kernel packages, or putting the updates elsewhere?
--
Horms
. This is what was up until yesterday trunk/linux-2.6.
Don't shoot the messanger :)
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-image-2.6.14-2 with initramfs made by
initramfs-tools).
I believe that the problem still remains at boot time because
root is read-only, and modprobe's locks require write access.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Netdev,
could someone please comment on what a good default congestion
algorithm setup for distribution kernels is?
Thanks
--
Horms
read the full #333052 and #333522 bugs.
Well, it did for me (the usb stuff on powerpc), but then this is maybe another
issue ?
Sven, I think the problem Marco is talking about is a real bug.
He and Rusty are trying to figure out a solution.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
file, as in question 3) above
./debian/rules debian/rules.gen debian/contol
6. Mangle at will, as per question 2) above
7. Run dpkg-buildpackage
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:24:16AM +, George B. wrote:
P.S. I could try unloading the ide-generic module etc. if you think
that's a good idea.
I think its certainly worth a try, though its probably not going
to make much difference.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 07:57:18AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:57:54AM +0900, Horms wrote:
Vesafb is no more modular now, and should either have been dropped fully
or
builtin, please check the config file.
As the driver is no longer modular it is now built
in kernel-package?
Manoj,
I took a look and it seems that something bad is going on in the
scripts/basic direcory. I've prodded away at this a bit, and I think
this is a make-kpkg problem. Unfortunately I have no more time to prod
today, could you take a look into it?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:01:05PM +0100, Vincent L??nngren wrote:
Here it is, but with pptp connection tracking turned off since I needed
the kernel.
Thanks.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
motive, especially as we have been getting better on the
packaging side. And there really hasn't been any discussion of it
since Helsinki. Its probably well enough to let it go back to sleep for
now.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
been around since 2.6.12-X, but only noticed recently. I'd like to get
that fixed, but it seems much less severe than this problem.
http://bugs.debian.org/336424
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for the record it should read:
As Sven said vesafb isn't a module at 2.6.14. So for 2.6.14 you need both,
for =2.6.14 you only need to add fbcon to the conf file.
And with that combination your console is alive?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
. Don't
understand why m-i-t isn't serializing the right bits.
Yes, that seems to be the current school of thought.
Rusty has been thinking it over with Marco, but we are
yet to find the solution.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
1 - 100 of 1044 matches
Mail list logo
