Am 17.04.11 06:01, schrieb Thomas Goirand:
I have an old laptop with a bad internal WiFi board, so I bought a newer
RaLink driver. To make it work, I had to add the option rt2800usb -
Include support for rt33xx devices (EXPERIMENTAL) and rt2800usb -
Include support for rt35xx devices
Hi Dann,
Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 16:09 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:31:20AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
I'd appreciate it if an existing drbd user could test it.
I didn't hear back from the drbd maintainers, but I did get some
testing feedback from a drbd user
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92n
Hi,
in 0.92m, the timeout for ipconfig in scripts/functions was set to 60
seconds. This broke our iscsi-rootfs setups.
It took me a while to debug this, but it seems that 60 seconds is not
enough for switches which have spanning-tree enabled, they need
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 14:32 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
[...]
Does this match other people's interpretations?
Yes.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 01:33 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Norbert said he was going to contact the upstream maintainer of the driver,
but there's no information about what came of that.
Unfortunately I never got a reply.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 15:43 +0100, Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
Or would it be possible to have the Areca driver backported to the
Debian 2.4.18 kernel?
The Areca driver is part of the Debian kernel since 2.6.18-2.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
* Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
Norbert, do you have any further thoughts on this?
It's still on my radar, I hope to find some time to take a closer look
at it next weekend.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
* Andras HORVATH wrote:
linux-image-2.6.18-4-alpha-smp still suffers from Could not
allocate X bytes percpu data when loading modules (for example,
xfs, eepro100 and e100).
I've found this discussion (regarding the previous version,
linux-image-2.6.18-3-alpha-smp):
tags 409222 +moreinfo
thanks
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
adds nearly two minutes to the boot time as the timeouts on both
ata1 and ata2 are nearly 50 seconds - 30 seconds waiting time each
plus several 5 second retries.
Sounds like #391867 which was fixed in 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9, please
* Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
Targeting this kernel for etch would be appreciated.
It is targeted for etch.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Michael Richters wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 03:23:44PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Michael Richters wrote:
I have a Dell PowerEdge 860, and the current stock Debian
kernels cannot access /dev/rtc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]
# hwclock --show
select() to /dev/rtc to wait
* Michael Richters wrote:
I have a Dell PowerEdge 860, and the current stock Debian kernels
cannot access /dev/rtc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]
# hwclock --show
select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out
This same error occurs when the system is booting.
Could you please retry the
* Michael Richters wrote:
I have a Dell PowerEdge 860, and the current stock Debian kernels
cannot access /dev/rtc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]
# hwclock --show
select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out
This same error occurs when the system is booting.
Same here on a Dell Optiplex
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
[...]
The upload should be scheduled for Tuesday, unless someone vetoes.
Is there a new schedule already?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre wrote:
Could not allocate 16 bytes percpu data
2.6.18-2 and newer include a workaround for this problem.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* David Lazar wrote:
Same problem here, running linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 (version
2.6.18-7) on a Dell Optiplex GX620.
Could you please try if the kernel from
http://people.debian.org/~nobse/kernel/linux-2.6/i386/
fixes this problem? If it works for you, I'm going to add this patch
to
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/broken-out/alpha-increase-percpu_enough_room.patch
It's on my TODO list for this weekend.
This patch gets us back to the Relocation overflow problem, which was
also reported by James
* Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Frederik Schueler wrote:
If you have any last minute changes which are that important they
cannot wait for the first point release kernel, please list them
here so we can discuss them.
You may want to apply this patch. This problem was reported before
on
* Holger Levsen wrote:
On Friday 15 December 2006 18:08, Frederik Schueler wrote:
1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI
which version of the patch is it? 2.0.2.2-rc6 and 2.0.2.2-rc9 has
a critical bug which causes kernel oops if there is other traffic
while restarting vservers.
* David Lazar wrote:
Same problem here, running linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 (version
2.6.18-7) on a Dell Optiplex GX620.
Same hardware here, same problem.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/13408
If this patch is part of 2.6.19 or 2.6.20, it should be added.
Norbert
--
* maximilian attems wrote:
nobse please check if the patch from vorlon satitisfies.
Looks good, first flavour built fine, second one still building.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* maximilian attems wrote:
nobse please check if the patch from vorlon satitisfies.
Looks good, first flavour built fine, second one still building.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Falk Hueffner wrote:
This updated patch instead of alpha-no-ev4-directive.patch should
help:
Are you going to add this patch to the next gcc-4.1 upload?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
- alpha gcc-4.1 migration
It seems that there's no ABI bump for -4 wanted, so no way to move
alpha to gcc-4.1, I already reverted my earlier commit.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
* Bastian Blank wrote:
Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
Log:
Switched alpha to gcc-4.1, bumped ABI revision.
I don't see a discussion about the ABI name change.
There was a discussion about switching alpha to gcc-4.1 about two
weeks ago.
I revert that.
Then you also need to revert
* Martin Michlmayr wrote:
FWIW, Falk Hueffner prepared the following patch which just needs
testing: http://people.debian.org/~falk/alpha-no-ev4-directive.patch
Included in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds2-17.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
* Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-12 22:52]:
* Jurij Smakov wrote:
What needs to be done for alpha? Does it FTBFS with gcc 4.1?
Yes.
Anybody can run a build and make the log available?
Tomorrow.
FWIW, Falk Hueffner prepared
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
Linux 2.6.18 has been released, and it looks like we can do a first
upload today.
Is there an .orig.tar.gz already?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* maximilian attems wrote:
It didn't fix the problem.
one first shot would be to lower CONFIG_NR_CPUS in config.alpha-smp
Tried that already.
or otherwise one could use a similar hack than the one proposed here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=115507250028744w=2
Didn't work
* Steve Langasek wrote:
Frederik Schueler wrote:
#369517: linux-image-2.6.16-1-alpha-smp: undefined scsi symbols;
fails to allocate percpu data
The alpha smp kernel didn't work in sarge either. I would suggest
dropping this flavor until someone steps up to maintain it.
Agreed, I'm going
* Andras Horvath wrote:
Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
I think I have a patch which fixes this problem, building a new
kernel currently...
It didn't fix the problem.
if that's 2.6.17-2 then I'm sorry to report that -smp still doesn't
work (same scsi errors; see attached log). -generic works
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Andras Horvath wrote:
but the -smp is still suffering from the same SCSI problems..
Confirmed, I'll investigate next weekend.
I think I have a patch which fixes this problem, building a new kernel
currently...
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
* Christian T. Steigies wrote:
Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Bastian Blank wrote:
At least alpha seems to be in an unmaintained state, and this
have to be solved quickly.
Aha.
Really?
No.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
tags 369517 +confirmed
thanks
* Andras Horvath wrote:
[...]
but the -smp is still suffering from the same SCSI problems..
Confirmed, I'll investigate next weekend.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
* Bastian Blank wrote:
The following arches did not yet switch to gcc-4.1:
- alpha
Linux 2.6.17 doesn't compile with gcc 4.1 on alpha.
At least alpha seems to be in an unmaintained state, and this have
to be solved quickly.
Aha.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
At least alpha seems to be in an unmaintained state, and this
have to be solved quickly.
Aha.
How is the alpha-vserver flavour coming along? ;-)
It's still on my todo list, but due to some personal and job-related
changes in my
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After repeating my question a few times, I was able to deduce from
Bastian's one-word replies that he talked to someone else on
ftp-master team and was assured that the rejection of sparc binaries
was still possible.
Bastian tends to ignore uncomfortable questions.
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
What is the status of the other architectures?
alpha
Test-build is running currently.
2.6.17 is ready on alpha, kernel built and works fine.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
What is the status of the other architectures?
alpha
Test-build is running currently.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
owner 304330 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
owner 333695 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
* Bastian Blank wrote:
As there was no progress over 2 months in this two ITP and the
kernel team was asked to provide support for the kernel included
iscsi support, I overtake both ITP in favour of the kernel team.
Next
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 04:47:43PM -0500, martin f krafft wrote:
After the upgrade to 2.6.16 (from 2.6.15), I started seeing the
following errors during boot:
rerunning alsaconf fixes this.
No, it doesn't, I'm still seeing these errors during boot after
* Martin Michlmayr wrote:
kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha fails to build in unstable.
Yes, I know. I have an update ready, but I didn't upload it yet
because it's seems to be that we're removing 2.4 from etch.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
I would like to upload 2.6.17-rc3 to experimental next monday,
this leaves 4 days for preparations.
I have no chance to update the alpha configs before leaving to
debconf6, and I'm not sure if alpha available there, so I don't
know if I'm able to update the configs.
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Bastian Blank wrote:
Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were
uploaded.
There was.
Where?
Bastian? I'm still interested where the uploads of 2.6.16-8 and
2.6.16-9
Currently the linux-patch-debian-* and linux-support-* packages
depending on python2.4-minimal.
According[0] to Steve, the python-minimal package should not be
used as a dependency by other packages. I think it's the same for
python2.4-minimal.
Norbert
[0]:
Hi,
2.6.16.10 was just released, hence I'd like to upload 2.6.16-10 as
soon as possible (tomorrow), to fix the FTBFS on alpha.
Any objections?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
Do we have the resources to check the next upload for all
architectures within a day or two?
No. My Alpha needs 18 hours for building all three flavours which are
available for alpha.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
* Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 10:34:06AM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
No. My Alpha needs 18 hours for building all three flavours which
are available for alpha.
Which sort of machine?
EV56, 433 MHz, 192 MB RAM.
What happens if you use ccache?
It faster? I haven't
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Bastian Blank wrote:
Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were
uploaded.
There was.
Where?
Bastian? I'm still interested where the uploads of 2.6.16-8 and
2.6.16-9 have been announced
* Bastian Blank wrote:
Don't upload 2.6.16-10 without any notice.
I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were uploaded.
2.6.16-8 broke alpha builds, because 2.6.16.6 is buggy. I just wanted
to fix it.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
* Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:53:36PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were
uploaded.
There was.
Where?
2.6.16-8 broke alpha builds, because 2.6.16.6 is buggy. I just
wanted to fix it.
2.6.16.10 is scheduled
tags 364206 +pending
thanks
* Nicholas Riley wrote:
The 2.6.16.6 patch contains a reference to for_each_possible_cpu,
which is not present until 2.6.17. It should be replaced with
for_each_cpu. This causes the package to fail to build on Alpha.
Thanks, I added your patch.
* Bastian Blank wrote:
The backports.org archive carries current versions of most needed
packages to run new kernels on Sarge but some of them (eg
initramfs-tools) are outdated,
That's because backports.org is based on testing, not unstable.
It's the same reason why 2.6.16 isn't available on
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
As of now, the following architectures still need updated configs:
alpha
Nope, buildd had no problems.
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=linux-2.6ver=2.6.16-1arch=alphafile=log
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
The svn branch to be used is dists/trunk/linux-2.6/
It's based on 2.6.15-3, what about the changes in -4, -5, -6 and the
not yet uploaded -7?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
It's currently not possible to build linux-2.6 with testing, because
2.6.15-4 build-depends on kernel-package (= 10.029), but testing has
9.008.4. Looks like the testing scripts don't consider build-depends.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
* Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias wrote:
I guess the controller goes offline when doing the initrd with
yaird, so maybe some sysfs poking by yaird is the cause. This seems
very bizarre.
I just uploaded a backport of klibc and initramfs-tools, could you try
to rebuilt the initrd with
* Sven Luther wrote:
matroxfb is problematic, since the matroxfb maintainer didn't agree
on the 2.4-2.6 fbdev API change, and thus things broke all over,
and has a huge patch that reverses the new fbdev stuff. At least
this was the case a year or two back at least.
Last time I tried matroxfb
tags 339080 +pending
thanks
* Uwe Schindler wrote:
Looking through the kernel surces of the different architectures I
have seen that almost all architectures use the same irq.c code. In
newer kernels ( 2.6.8) for example x86, ia64, amd64, powerpc,
parisc change to a generic IRQ handler code.
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
Alpha was switched to the generic irq framework a few hours ago in
the git-tree. I'm thinking about adding that patch to 2.6.15-2.
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=eee45269b0f5979c70bc151c6c2f4e5f4f5ababe
http
* James McCaw wrote:
Since upgrading to kernel 2.6.15 (from 2.6.14) I now get this kernel
message consistently when running fgl_glxgears (provided by fglrx
driver package) or standard glxgears. It may be an error with the
binary fglrx driver, but given the specific reference to
mm/swap.c:49 I
* Marco Presi (Zufus) wrote:
after upgrading I am not able to suspend to ram anymore
(/proc/acpi/sleep is missing).
What's wrong with /sys/power/state?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 346107 normal
reassign 346107 klaptopdaemon
merge 337502 346107
thanks
* Jim Hague wrote:
On Thursday 05 Jan 2006 18:25, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Marco Presi (Zufus) wrote:
after upgrading I am not able to suspend to ram anymore
(/proc/acpi/sleep is missing).
What's wrong
reassign 346141 yaird
severity 346141 important
merge 341524 346141
thanks
* Fabien COUTANT wrote:
You are attempting to install an initrd kernel image (version
2.6.15-1-k7-smp) on a machine currently running kernel version
2.4.31-k7-smp.
* Gabor Gombas wrote:
Packaging at least -rc kernels for unstable might be a good idea for
Debian too. That would provide more testing coverage for -rc releases,
and this is what upstream needs the most.
We already had some -rc releases in experimental for 2.6.14 and
2.6.15.
Norbert
--
To
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
The following architectures need their configs still to be
updated:
alpha
Current svn (and rc7.experimental1 too) builds fine on alpha.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.42
Severity: normal
I gave initramfs-tools a new try on my alpha, but it failed to create
a working initrd:
SCSI subsystem initialized
qla1280: QLA1040 found on PCI bus 1, dev 8
scsi(0:0): Resetting SCSI BUS
scsi0 : QLogic QLA1040 PCI to SCSI Host Adapter
* Horms wrote:
* Recently fixed, in the most need of testing
kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha
kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha
I'm going to take a look at those next weekend.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I switched the alpha build from gcc-3.3 to gcc-4.0 in the not yet
uploaded 2.6.14-3, and Jurij said he'll also switch sparc from gcc-3.3
to gcc-4.0.
How to handle these ABI changes for specific architectures?
Thanks, Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
* Bill Gatliff wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
Version: 2.6.12-10
Can you please give 2.6.14-2 a try?
Thanks, Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Sven Luther wrote:
ALERT!: /dev/hda1 does not exist, Dropping to a shell!
I saw the same on my notebook (i386) when using MODULES=dep in
initramfs.conf.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Kim Hansen wrote:
The quota support for XFS is gone in the newest kernel. The reason
(bug in configfile) and fix is explained here:
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0510.3/1153.html
Thanks, I hope this will get fixed in 2.6.14.1, so it's
* Horms wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:32:05AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
would it be possible to apply the following patchlet to
/srv/svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/hooks/post-commit?
[...]
Sure, though I don't seem to be able to check hooks/post-commit out
:(
You have to login at costa and
* Kim Hansen wrote:
The quota support for XFS is gone in the newest kernel. The reason
(bug in configfile) and fix is explained here:
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0510.3/1153.html
Thanks, I hope this will get fixed in 2.6.14.1, so it's not worth to
add a new patch to svn yet.
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now there is shown as the content of
/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.14-1-686/.extraversion
2.6.14-1-686
This is the full version, rather than the persumably desired
EXTRAVERSION component
This is fixed in 2.6.14-2 from unstable.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
* Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
$ -depmod -a
zsh: command not found: -depmod
if it is a shell command that won't work.
From the GNU make documentation:
,
| To ignore errors in a command line, write a `-' at the beginning of
| the line's text (after the initial tab).
`
* roberto wrote:
i am looking for the latest downloadable kernel-source-2.6.x package
for sarge, but i did not find anything later than 2.6.8 in
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages.en-gb.html#search_packages
The kernel-source package is architecture independent, you can use the
one from
* Anand Kumria wrote:
I can recall quite a number of incident where i've moved a disk from
an athlon k6 to k7 (and vice versa) and found random failures until
I picked the right kernel package.
Hu? Running a k6 kernel on a k7 shouldn't be a problem.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
* Sven Luther wrote:
but alpha, hppa and arm all three had commits fixing the FTBFS a few
hours after the upload, so as soon as we get confirmation of the
build success, we can do -2.
Confirmed for alpha, 2.6.14-2 builds fine.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
* Horms wrote:
I've put the packages in
http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6-2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4/
incase they dissapear from other sources.
The ABI revision in the version number is missing in those packages.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
* Horms wrote:
I am, right at this moment, building 2.6.13-1.experimental.1, and
assuming the i386 build completes I will upload. I already know it
doesn't compile on HPPA, and I expect other FTBFS.
It will fail on alpha too, I hope I'll find time next weekend to
update the configs.
Norbert
* Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:55:51PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Andres Salomon wrote:
I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is
to not have it require any further backports.
Just for info, I already prepared a backport of linux-2.6
* Allyn, Mark A wrote:
Does anyone know what the plans are for 2.6.13, which is now
available from www.kernel.org? I notice that unstable (sid) is still
at 2.6.12.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/09/msg00458.html
I have just subscribed to this email list; I apologize if this
* Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I just installed the above-named kernel package (tried several
times), but the grub menu.lst is not updated, so unless I start to
manually edit it, I cannot use the kernel. I also did not receive
any notice why the menu.lst would not be touched.
Have you tried to run
* Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I just installed the above-named kernel package (tried several
times), but the grub menu.lst is not updated, so unless I start to
manually edit it, I cannot use the kernel. I also did not receive
any notice why the menu.lst would not be touched.
Have you tried to run
* dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 11:58 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
2.4.27 is building.
And done:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel/sparc/2.4.27
Works fine on my sparc64.
Thanks, Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Horms wrote:
2. 2.6.8-16sarge1 for stable-security
3. 2.4.27-10sarge1 for stable-security
Builds finished on alpha.
http://people.debian.org/~nobse/kernel/alpha/sarge/
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
* Horms wrote:
I've been told that the s390 installer works it, and its needed for
some m68k flavours (mac users who want a working keyboard IRRC).
2.4.27 is also still needed for the alpha installer.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
* Andres Salomon wrote:
- there are 3 patches that were in 2.6.11 that have been dropped due to
lack of interest; sparc, alpha, and powerpc folks should determine
their value, at some point.
The dropped alpha patch is no longer required with 2.6.12, at least on
my systems the kernel works
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Steve Langasek wrote:
If there are updates to unstable pending for any other
architectures, please let debian-release know.
I'm currently compiling updates for alpha 2.4 and 2.6 kernels,
upload tomorrow.
Uploaded, please approve for sarge.
Norbert
* Steve Langasek wrote:
If there are updates to unstable pending for any other
architectures, please let debian-release know.
I'm currently compiling updates for alpha 2.4 and 2.6 kernels, upload
tomorrow.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
* Horms wrote:
2.4.27: alpha kernel-tree-2.4.27-9 (seems to be out of date
in SVN)
I'm going to upload kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha 2.4.27-9 next weekend,
built against kernel-tree-2.4.27-8, because 2.4.27-8 made it into
testing by mistake.
I'm
* Nico Golde wrote:
why the debian kernel-packages don't provide the config file via
/proc?
Because the file is available in '/boot/config-$(uname -r)'.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Bob Lindell wrote:
[...]
I added an additional || defined (__alpha__) expression and
compiled the driver. I tested it on a PC164 running the Sarge
2.4.27-2-generic kernel. Seems to run correctly on the Alpha. All 4
ports of the card worked properly.
This fix needs to make it upstream to
reassign 304028 discover
thanks
* Florian Hars wrote:
maximilian attems wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Florian Hars wrote:
If I boot into 2.6.8-2, I have no mouse.
i presume that you are not using hotplug/discover.
I most definitely use discover, as I found out the hard way
* Jaap Haitsma wrote:
I get around 10 messages which say something like
ERROR Removing module 'x' where is a name of some module
just before init starts
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/03/msg00114.html
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
reassign 301486 discover1
thanks
* Florian Hars wrote:
It wasn't a initrd problem at all, /etc/rcS/S36discover was the
culprit. If I disable qlogicisp for discover, 2.6.8-2 boots.
Alright, thanks for feedback and reporting!
So I'm reassigning this bugreport to discover1, see #289995 for
* Florian wrote:
Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
Hmm... what's the output of 'lspci' on your system?
Here it is:
:00:03.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip
21142/43 (rev 30)
:00:07.0 ISA bridge: Contaq Microsystems 82c693
:00:07.1 IDE interface: Contaq
* hars wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 05:48:18PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
Why are you loading both, qlogicisp _and_ qla1280 on boot?
Disabling the qlogicisp module should fix your problem.
I didn't do anything, I just booted the kernel as installed by
apt-get.
Hmm... what's
* Florian Hars wrote:
Loading qlogicisp module.
ERROR: SCSI host `isp1020' has no error handling
ERROR: This is not a safe way to run your SCSI host
ERROR: The error handling must be added to this driver
fc000fb2bdf8 fffc00385db0 fffc0026a390 fffc00386968
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
