Bug#714974: [PATCH] jfs: fix readdir cookie incompatibility with NFSv4

2013-09-04 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 03:48:03PM -0700, Jonathan McDowell wrote: On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:01:31PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 14:26 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 at 15:48, Dave Kleikamp wrote: This patch replaces the one I posted yesterday. I

Bug#714974: [PATCH] jfs: fix readdir cookie incompatibility with NFSv4

2013-08-29 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:01:31PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 14:26 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 at 15:48, Dave Kleikamp wrote: This patch replaces the one I posted yesterday. I like this better since it doesn't require fixing existing on-disk

Bug#714974: [PATCH] jfs: fix readdir cookie incompatibility with NFSv4

2013-08-17 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 14:26 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 at 15:48, Dave Kleikamp wrote: This patch replaces the one I posted yesterday. I like this better since it doesn't require fixing existing on-disk cookies or skipping a position in the in-inode index table.

Bug#714974: [PATCH] jfs: fix readdir cookie incompatibility with NFSv4

2013-08-15 Thread Dave Kleikamp
This patch replaces the one I posted yesterday. I like this better since it doesn't require fixing existing on-disk cookies or skipping a position in the in-inode index table. NFSv4 reserves readdir cookie values 0-2 for special entries (. and ..), but jfs allows a value of 2 for a non-special

Bug#714974: [PATCH] jfs: fix readdir cookie incompatibility with NFSv4

2013-08-15 Thread Christian Kujau
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 at 15:48, Dave Kleikamp wrote: This patch replaces the one I posted yesterday. I like this better since it doesn't require fixing existing on-disk cookies or skipping a position in the in-inode index table. Thanks. Applied to 3.11-rc5 and tested, no more readdir loop

Bug#714974: [PATCH] jfs: fix readdir cookie incompatibility with NFSv4

2013-08-15 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On 08/15/2013 04:26 PM, Christian Kujau wrote: On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 at 15:48, Dave Kleikamp wrote: This patch replaces the one I posted yesterday. I like this better since it doesn't require fixing existing on-disk cookies or skipping a position in the in-inode index table. Thanks. Applied