Bug#898165: Regression in [v2] nfs: Fix ugly referral attributes ?

> On May 17, 2018, at 5:48 PM, Moritz Schlarb wrote: > > Hi Chuck, > > On 17.05.2018 16:15, Chuck Lever wrote: > >> Just a shot in the dark: Wondering if v3.16 needs >> >> commit ea96d1ecbe4fcb1df487d99309d3157b4ff5fc02 >> Author: Anna Schumaker

Bug#898165: Regression in [v2] nfs: Fix ugly referral attributes ?

Control: tags -1 + upstream patch Control: severity -1 grave Control: summary -1 0 Control: outlook -1 0 3.16.54 introduced a regression by including "nfs: Fix ugly referral attributes" but not "nfs: Fetch MOUNTED_ON_FILEID when updating an inode". Please include that other patch, too so NFS

Bug#898165: Regression in [v2] nfs: Fix ugly referral attributes ?

Hi Chuck, On 17.05.2018 16:15, Chuck Lever wrote: > Just a shot in the dark: Wondering if v3.16 needs > > commit ea96d1ecbe4fcb1df487d99309d3157b4ff5fc02 > Author: Anna Schumaker > AuthorDate: Fri Apr 3 14:35:59 2015 -0400 > Commit: Trond Myklebust

Bug#898165: Regression in [v2] nfs: Fix ugly referral attributes ?

> On May 17, 2018, at 3:53 AM, Moritz Schlarb wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > there might be a regression coming from this patch: > Since it got included in 3.16.54, our clients running a recent 3.16 > kernel (like from Debian jessie-security) did not follow NFS 4.1 >

Bug#898165: Regression in [v2] nfs: Fix ugly referral attributes ?

Hi everyone, there might be a regression coming from this patch: Since it got included in 3.16.54, our clients running a recent 3.16 kernel (like from Debian jessie-security) did not follow NFS 4.1 referrals (issued by nfs-ganesha) anymore. I have built that exact Debian kernel package with just