Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.19-1)
I'm intending to release Linux 3.2.19 later today. The complete release (files uploaded) depends on Greg K-H and probably won't be done until later in the week, but we don't use pristine tarballs so this doesn't hold up a Debian upload. It will include the usual mixture of security fixes, other important bug fixes and small changes to support more hardware. So I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.19-1 tomorrow. This might require an ABI bump but it is probably avoidable. The current Debian changes add support for new Blade Engines NICs, CoDel network queue management, and better integration of the Hyper-V paravirtualised drivers. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.18-1)
I intend to release Linux 3.2.18 on Sunday, and then upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.18-1 to unstable. The upstream changes include quite a few stability and security fixes, but this update will be much smaller than 3.2.17. Debian changes include some new hardware support. No ABI change should be necessary. Can 3.2.17-1 be expedited into testing? I don't believe we've had any regressions reported. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Experience is directly proportional to the value of equipment destroyed. - Carolyn Scheppner signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.18-1)
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (19/05/2012): I intend to release Linux 3.2.18 on Sunday, and then upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.18-1 to unstable. The upstream changes include quite a few stability and security fixes, but this update will be much smaller than 3.2.17. Debian changes include some new hardware support. No ABI change should be necessary. Good (no ABI changes). Can 3.2.17-1 be expedited into testing? I don't believe we've had any regressions reported. I'll look into making that happen in the next hour. While I'm at it, thanks for letting us know about all those uploads. That's really appreciated. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.17-1)
I intend to release Linux 3.2.17 on Saturday and then upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.17-1 to unstable. This includes a large number of bug fixes. No ABI change should be necessary. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans. - John Lennon signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.16-1)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable this weekend. This includes various important fixes from upstream stable version 3.2.16, a few more bug fixes, and the addition of 'EFI stub' support on x86 (cherry-picked from 3.3). There should be no ABI bump. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.15-1)
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:48:11 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Would it be possible to accelerate testing migration of 3.2.14-1, so that that happens before it's replaced by 3.2.15-1? Set to 8 days instead of 10. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.15-1)
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:11:59 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:48:11 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Would it be possible to accelerate testing migration of 3.2.14-1, so that that happens before it's replaced by 3.2.15-1? Set to 8 days instead of 10. And migrated now, so sid is clear for 3.2.15. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.15-1)
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 13:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:11:59 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:48:11 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Would it be possible to accelerate testing migration of 3.2.14-1, so that that happens before it's replaced by 3.2.15-1? Set to 8 days instead of 10. And migrated now, so sid is clear for 3.2.15. Thanks, Julien! Ben. -- Ben Hutchings It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.15-1)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.15-1 during this weekend. This includes various important fixes from upstream stable version 3.2.15, and may have urgency=high (to be decided). There should not be any ABI bump. Would it be possible to accelerate testing migration of 3.2.14-1, so that that happens before it's replaced by 3.2.15-1? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.14-1)
Another week, another stable update. Linux 3.2.14 will have a large number of important bug fixes. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchett signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.13-1)
Hi folks I intend to upload linux-2.6 3.2.13-1 later this evening. It should fix s390x build. Bastian -- Those who hate and fight must stop themselves -- otherwise it is not stopped. -- Spock, Day of the Dove, stardate unknown -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120327094812.ga4...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.12-1)
Another week, another kernel version. More important security and other fixes from upstream, and a fix for the FTBFS on s390(x). I don't believe any ABI bump is required. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Life would be so much easier if we could look at the source code. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.10-1)
There will be an upload of linux-2.6 version 3.2.10-1 to unstable shortly. This will include upstream stable release 3.2.10 which fixes a local DoS bug, CVE-2012-1097, and will therefore have high urgency. It should also fix some serious regressions in the realtime featureset. It doesn't look like any ABI bump is required. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120312194748.ga12...@decadent.org.uk
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.9-1)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable tomorrow or Monday. Version 3.2.9-1 will include upstream stable updates 3.2.8 and 3.2.9 which fix various bugs, some of them quite serious. It should fix the FTBFS on some architectures in 3.2.7-1. There will be an ABI bump. The link security restrictions will also be included in this version. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings One of the nice things about standards is that there are so many of them. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.9-1)
Ben, am Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 05:42:28PM + hast du folgendes geschrieben: I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable tomorrow or Monday. Version 3.2.9-1 will include upstream stable updates 3.2.8 and 3.2.9 which fix various bugs, some of them quite serious. It should fix the FTBFS on some architectures in 3.2.7-1. There will be an ABI bump. The link security restrictions will also be included in this version. shouldn't there be a breaks on a fixed version of at? Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.9-1)
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 20:22 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: Ben, am Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 05:42:28PM + hast du folgendes geschrieben: I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable tomorrow or Monday. Version 3.2.9-1 will include upstream stable updates 3.2.8 and 3.2.9 which fix various bugs, some of them quite serious. It should fix the FTBFS on some architectures in 3.2.7-1. There will be an ABI bump. The link security restrictions will also be included in this version. shouldn't there be a breaks on a fixed version of at? Yes, in fact I'll do that instead of adding a NEWS item. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings One of the nice things about standards is that there are so many of them. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.7-1)
Hi folks I intend to upload linux-2.6 3.2.7-1 tomorrow, after 3.2.6-1 landed recently in testing. Appart from the new upstream stable release, this includes several config changes. Hopefully it does not contain more changes to the ABI then already found. Bastian -- Vulcans do not approve of violence. -- Spock, Journey to Babel, stardate 3842.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120227175622.ga23...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.6-1)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.6-1 to unstable tomorrow. This includes a large number of fixes from upstream stable release 3.2.6. It also adds a realtime configuration for i386 (rt-686-pae). There is no ABI change. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers. - Leonard Brandwein signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.4-1)
Hi I intend to upload linux-2.6 3.2.4-1 later today. It fixes the mips FTBFS and also includes the pci-e power management (aspm) rework. Bastian -- Love sometimes expresses itself in sacrifice. -- Kirk, Metamorphosis, stardate 3220.3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120205085624.ga24...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.4-1)
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 14:06 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.2-1 to unstable shortly. This should fix the FTBFS on armel and various other bugs. SUBLEVEL = 4 And maybe we can fix the FTBFS on mips and finally get 3.2 into testing. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance. - Robert Coveyou signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.4-1)
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 18:38 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 14:06 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.2-1 to unstable shortly. This should fix the FTBFS on armel and various other bugs. SUBLEVEL = 4 And maybe we can fix the FTBFS on mips and finally get 3.2 into testing. Well it looks like I won't be able to run a build until Monday as wake-on-LAN failed. Anyone else got the time to do this? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance. - Robert Coveyou signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.2-1)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.2-1 to unstable shortly. This should fix the FTBFS on armel and various other bugs. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Lowery's Law: If it jams, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.1-1)
Hi Ben, Ben Hutchings wrote: I wonder which kernel is targeted for Wheezy. According to http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/stable-status-01-2012.html neither 3.1 nor 3.2 will be longterm supported kernels while 3.0 will get longterm support by upstream. IIRC there was once at least the question if 3.0 should be used for Wheezy. But I guess that's no more a question as 3.0 is no more in unstable nor testing. (Sorry if that question had been answered before, but recently that question came up on IRC when someone posted the above mentioned link.) These should answer your questions: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2011/12/msg6.html Ah, that's the mail I had in mind -- although with wrong version numbers. http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2012/01/msg00254.html And that's the mail I missed. Thanks for the pointers! Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert a...@debian.org, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `-| 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120116094126.gs2...@sym.noone.org
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.1-1)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first upstream stable update. The packaging and configuration changes include: - [amd64] reenable rt featureset (not available for Linux 3.1) - Use xz compression for all packages. - security: Enable APPARMOR (Closes: #598408) - [armel] disable tomoyo and apparmor to allow kernel image to fit into flash. - Install /lib/modules/kernel-version/modules.builtin in linux-image packages (prerequisite for kmod) Ben. -- Ben Hutchings When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.1-1)
Hi Ben, Ben Hutchings wrote: I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first upstream stable update. I wonder which kernel is targeted for Wheezy. According to http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/stable-status-01-2012.html neither 3.1 nor 3.2 will be longterm supported kernels while 3.0 will get longterm support by upstream. IIRC there was once at least the question if 3.0 should be used for Wheezy. But I guess that's no more a question as 3.0 is no more in unstable nor testing. (Sorry if that question had been answered before, but recently that question came up on IRC when someone posted the above mentioned link.) Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert a...@debian.org, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `-| 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120116005527.go2...@sym.noone.org
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.1-1)
On 16/01/12 01:55, Axel Beckert wrote: Hi Ben, Ben Hutchings wrote: I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first upstream stable update. I wonder which kernel is targeted for Wheezy. According to http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/stable-status-01-2012.html neither 3.1 nor 3.2 will be longterm supported kernels while 3.0 will get longterm support by upstream. IIRC there was once at least the question if 3.0 should be used for Wheezy. But I guess that's no more a question as 3.0 is no more in unstable nor testing. (Sorry if that question had been answered before, but recently that question came up on IRC when someone posted the above mentioned link.) Regards, Axel 3.2 would be maintained (at least) by Ubuntu up to 2017 since they will be using it for their 12.04 LTS release There is a thread for the discussion about the Wheezy kernel here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2012/01/msg00254.html Regards! -- ~~~ Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.igalia.com ~~~ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.1-1)
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 01:55 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: Hi Ben, Ben Hutchings wrote: I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first upstream stable update. I wonder which kernel is targeted for Wheezy. According to http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/stable-status-01-2012.html neither 3.1 nor 3.2 will be longterm supported kernels while 3.0 will get longterm support by upstream. IIRC there was once at least the question if 3.0 should be used for Wheezy. But I guess that's no more a question as 3.0 is no more in unstable nor testing. (Sorry if that question had been answered before, but recently that question came up on IRC when someone posted the above mentioned link.) These should answer your questions: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2011/12/msg6.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2012/01/msg00254.html Ben. -- Ben Hutchings When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.1.8-1)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable later this week, once upstream stable update 3.1.8 is released. Linux 3.2 is also likely to be released very soon, but I think we still have some work to do on updating the configuration for it. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Make three consecutive correct guesses and you will be considered an expert. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.1.5-1)
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes: I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.1.5-1 to unstable this weekend. This is another upstream stable update. It also includes a fix for the FTBFS on mips/mipsel in 3.1.4-1. No ABI bump seems to be necessary. Ben. Shouldn't that be linux-3 or just plain linux now? MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87wra423ni.fsf@frosties.localnet
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.1.5-1)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.1.5-1 to unstable this weekend. This is another upstream stable update. It also includes a fix for the FTBFS on mips/mipsel in 3.1.4-1. No ABI bump seems to be necessary. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.1.3-1)
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 01:39:37AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 01:30 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: Are there any large blockers for uploading 3.1.2-1? I know about generated headers, where a fix is being tested. No blockers, but 3.1.3 is due any minute now. Okay. I intend to upload linux-2.6 3.1.3-1 on tuesday. Lets hope that I get some okay for the sparc fix. Bastian -- We Klingons believe as you do -- the sick should die. Only the strong should live. -- Kras, Friday's Child, stardate 3497.2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2027223417.ga22...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.1.3-1)
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:34:18PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 01:39:37AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 01:30 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: Are there any large blockers for uploading 3.1.2-1? I know about generated headers, where a fix is being tested. No blockers, but 3.1.3 is due any minute now. Okay. I intend to upload linux-2.6 3.1.3-1 on tuesday. Lets hope that I get some okay for the sparc fix. Yep, your patch did the trick. I've updated the bug (#650085), attaching the patch I actually used. Best regards, -- Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2027231846.ga21...@wooyd.org
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.1.2-1)
Hi Are there any large blockers for uploading 3.1.2-1? I know about generated headers, where a fix is being tested. Bastian -- Hailing frequencies open, Captain. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2027003032.ga3...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.1.2-1)
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 01:30 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi Are there any large blockers for uploading 3.1.2-1? I know about generated headers, where a fix is being tested. No blockers, but 3.1.3 is due any minute now. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The two most common things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.1.0-1)
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 01:56:46AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.1.0-1 to sid this weekend. This will include stable update 3.1.1 and fixes for the FTBFS in sid (powerpc) and experimental (armel, powerpc). It will be built with gcc-4.6, the default compiler version for wheezy. What now. 3.1.0-1 or 3.1.1-1? Bastian -- No more blah, blah, blah! -- Kirk, Miri, stardate 2713.6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2011133851.ga31...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.1.0-1)
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 14:38 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 01:56:46AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.1.0-1 to sid this weekend. This will include stable update 3.1.1 and fixes for the FTBFS in sid (powerpc) and experimental (armel, powerpc). It will be built with gcc-4.6, the default compiler version for wheezy. What now. 3.1.0-1 or 3.1.1-1? Calling it 3.1.1-1 means another new orig tarball and won't avoid confusion when we apply further stable updates without bumping the upstream version. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The program is absolutely right; therefore, the computer must be wrong. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.1.0-1)
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 04:49:57PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 14:38 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: What now. 3.1.0-1 or 3.1.1-1? Calling it 3.1.1-1 means another new orig tarball and won't avoid confusion when we apply further stable updates without bumping the upstream version. One orig per stable version was the plan. Bastian -- It would be illogical to kill without reason. -- Spock, Journey to Babel, stardate 3842.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2011183424.ga4...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.1.0-1)
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 07:34:25PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 04:49:57PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 14:38 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: What now. 3.1.0-1 or 3.1.1-1? Calling it 3.1.1-1 means another new orig tarball and won't avoid confusion when we apply further stable updates without bumping the upstream version. One orig per stable version was the plan. I'm not sure we're ready to do that yet. We certainly won't be able to do that during a (Debian) stable release as the old kernel packages will not get auto-removed. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2011205706.gs3...@decadent.org.uk
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.1.0-1)
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:57:06PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 07:34:25PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: One orig per stable version was the plan. I'm not sure we're ready to do that yet. We certainly won't be able to do that during a (Debian) stable release as the old kernel packages will not get auto-removed. Hu? I don't speak about package names, only versions. Bastian -- Oh, that sound of male ego. You travel halfway across the galaxy and it's still the same song. -- Eve McHuron, Mudd's Women, stardate 1330.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2011211454.ga12...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.1.0-1)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.1.0-1 to sid this weekend. This will include stable update 3.1.1 and fixes for the FTBFS in sid (powerpc) and experimental (armel, powerpc). It will be built with gcc-4.6, the default compiler version for wheezy. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The program is absolutely right; therefore, the computer must be wrong. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-6)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-6 to unstable today (Tuesday). This will include stable updates 3.0.7 and 3.0.8 and may require an ABI change (I haven't checked yet). It should fix the missing kernel-image udebs in 3.0.0-5, among other things. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-5)
Hello Ben,
2011/9/29 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-5 to unstable later this
week. This will include stable update 3.0.5 and may require an ABI
change (I haven't checked yet). It should fix the FTBFS on some
architectures in 3.0.0-4 (but other changes may introduce new failures).
Assuming that we don't find any more problems with the changes in
experimental to use kernel-wedge, I will apply those to unstable as
well. I'll need to upload kernel-wedge yet again with Joey's fix for
the bug that affected s390.
First of all thanks for the fish.
Yesterday I was playing kernels with 3.0.0-5 and noticed that when
building with dpkg-buildpackage -a$arch, kernel-wedge does not seem to
understand that. I just thought it might be useful to comment, I have
not been able to look into it (at least yet).
When building with -a$arch, you'll also notice the build fails when
doing tools/perf/ as it does not seem to pass
CROSS_COMPILE=${TRIPLET}- into the make call when building perf. I
looked into that, but I havent been able to finish cooking any
(tested) patch for that yet.
Best regards,
--
Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAODfWeEjE5i_Q+RUJD3wAq+QP0EOCCs11QgLGBp3e=jmror...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-5)
[Dropping debian-boot.]
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 04:00:10PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
Hello Ben,
2011/9/29 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-5 to unstable later this
week. This will include stable update 3.0.5 and may require an ABI
change (I haven't checked yet). It should fix the FTBFS on some
architectures in 3.0.0-4 (but other changes may introduce new failures).
Assuming that we don't find any more problems with the changes in
experimental to use kernel-wedge, I will apply those to unstable as
well. I'll need to upload kernel-wedge yet again with Joey's fix for
the bug that affected s390.
First of all thanks for the fish.
Yesterday I was playing kernels with 3.0.0-5 and noticed that when
building with dpkg-buildpackage -a$arch, kernel-wedge does not seem to
understand that. I just thought it might be useful to comment, I have
not been able to look into it (at least yet).
I think that kernel-wedge should be testing the environment variables
$DEB_HOST_* before calling dpkg-architecture, e.g.
arch=${DEB_HOST_ARCH:-$(dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH)}
When building with -a$arch, you'll also notice the build fails when
doing tools/perf/ as it does not seem to pass
CROSS_COMPILE=${TRIPLET}- into the make call when building perf. I
looked into that, but I havent been able to finish cooking any
(tested) patch for that yet.
perf will be built as part of the linux-tools (formerly
linux-kbuild-2.6) source package in future. Please to try to fix
trunk/linux-tools, if it is similarly broken.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
- Albert Camus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111010154607.gi3...@decadent.org.uk
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-5)
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 00:15, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: ... Assuming that we don't find any more problems with the changes in experimental to use kernel-wedge, I will apply those to unstable as well. I'll need to upload kernel-wedge yet again with Joey's fix for the bug that affected s390. That's awesome :-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKqd3X-8Speu6Hm7=pw1e45ywd5q1ynkljgq3e6nwq5...@mail.gmail.com
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-5)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-5 to unstable later this week. This will include stable update 3.0.5 and may require an ABI change (I haven't checked yet). It should fix the FTBFS on some architectures in 3.0.0-4 (but other changes may introduce new failures). Assuming that we don't find any more problems with the changes in experimental to use kernel-wedge, I will apply those to unstable as well. I'll need to upload kernel-wedge yet again with Joey's fix for the bug that affected s390. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-4)
I intend to upload a new version of linux-2.6 to unstable tomorrow. This will include upstream stable update 3.0.4 and various other bug fixes. It should not involve an ABI bump. Let me know if there is anything this should wait for. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Power corrupts. Absolute power is kind of neat. - John Lehman, Secretary of the US Navy 1981-1987 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-3)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-3 to unstable on Friday or Saturday. This will include the fixes from stable release 3.0.3 and should fix the FTBFS on mips mipsel. There should be no ABI bump. Ben. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-2)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-2 to unstable on Monday or Tuesday. This will include the fixes from stable releases 3.0.1 and 3.0.2 and rt release 3.0.1-rt8 (or later). Also, linux-libc-dev will support multi-arch. There should be no ABI bump. However, note that the ABI for packages with the 'rt' featureset is considered unstable and may change without an ABI bump. Ben. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-1)
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 19:45 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 03:05:37PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-1 to unstable tomorrow. * Make gcc-4.5 the default compiler (except for alpha, hppa and m68k) This change got reverted somehow. Fixed. And we want to go to 4.6 pretty fast. Let's try that in the next experimental upload. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchett signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-1)
On sam., 2011-07-23 at 15:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: If it's ready in time, we may also be able to add an 'rt' (real-time) featureset, initially for amd64 only. So featuresets are still somewhat supported / acceptable? Regards, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-1)
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 17:24 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On sam., 2011-07-23 at 15:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: If it's ready in time, we may also be able to add an 'rt' (real-time) featureset, initially for amd64 only. So featuresets are still somewhat supported / acceptable? They are still possible. I think we don't really want long-lived featuresets and will be more open to features that look likely to be merged upstream. The PREEMPT_RT patches are steadily being merged and I would expect to be able to provide rt flavours without use of a featureset patch in wheezy+1. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchett signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-1)
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk schrieb: --=-oAGGyietHuyp77ujkKt4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 17:24 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On sam., 2011-07-23 at 15:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: If it's ready in time, we may also be able to add an 'rt' (real-time) featureset, initially for amd64 only. =20 =20 So featuresets are still somewhat supported / acceptable? They are still possible. I think we don't really want long-lived featuresets and will be more open to features that look likely to be merged upstream. The PREEMPT_RT patches are steadily being merged and I would expect to be able to provide rt flavours without use of a featureset patch in wheezy+1. So, how to we proceed with the grsec flavour? We didn't come to a real conclusion wrt to it. I still very much want to see it merged and I'm still willing to contribute to the maintenance, as is apparently Yves-Alexis (that's what I'm reading of his question). grsec will be long-lived since I don't think upstream will turn sensible anytime soon. OTOH, if at some point Brad and the other people behind grsecurity discontinue it, this would be a less severe regression since the stoppage of providing a virtualisation flavour like openvz. Cheers, Moritz Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchett --=-oAGGyietHuyp77ujkKt4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part --=-oAGGyietHuyp77ujkKt4-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnj2ov7g.mfp@inutil.org
Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-1)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-1 to unstable tomorrow. Aside from upstream changes, the main changes are: * [x86] block, xen: Enable XEN_BLKDEV_BACKEND as module - This means x86 kernels (except for the 486 flavour) are now suitable for running in Xen dom0 * Make gcc-4.5 the default compiler (except for alpha, hppa and m68k) * Restore xen-linux-system-version-flavour packages * Remove 'provides' for virtual packages with the '-2.6' suffix If it's ready in time, we may also be able to add an 'rt' (real-time) featureset, initially for amd64 only. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-1)
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 03:05:37PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-1 to unstable tomorrow. * Make gcc-4.5 the default compiler (except for alpha, hppa and m68k) This change got reverted somehow. And we want to go to 4.6 pretty fast. Bastian -- ... The prejudices people feel about each other disappear when they get to know each other. -- Kirk, Elaan of Troyius, stardate 4372.5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110723174546.ga17...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.39-3)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.39-3 to unstable on Monday. This will include stable update 2.6.39.2. It doesn't appear to require an ABI bump. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Never attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by stupidity. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#627837: [b...@decadent.org.uk: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.39-2)]
This bugreport, #627837, is allready tagged 'pending'. The idea behind this forward is to add some further information. I think it helps, at least Hopes this helps Geert Stappers - Forwarded message from Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk - Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 05:01:48 +0100 From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk To: Debian kernel maintainers debian-kernel@lists.debian.org Cc: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org Subject: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.39-2) X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable early this week. This will include stable update 2.6.39.1 and restoration of aufs support for use in Debian Live. Stable update 2.6.39.1 includes an ABI change, so we will probably have to change the binary package names. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. - End forwarded message - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110606054809.ge1...@gpm.stappers.nl
Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.39-2)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable early this week. This will include stable update 2.6.39.1 and restoration of aufs support for use in Debian Live. Stable update 2.6.39.1 includes an ABI change, so we will probably have to change the binary package names. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.38-5)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 verson 2.6.38-5 tomorrow. This will incorporate 2.6.38.5, which fixes numerous bugs including local privilege escalation bugs in the agp driver (CVE-2011-1745, CVE-2011-1746). Let me know if there's anything I should wait for. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.38-4)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.38-4 to unstable this week, including the upstream stable release 2.6.38.4. Linux 2.6.38.4 appears to include some ABI changes so we may need to bump the ABI number. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110419212003.gy2...@decadent.org.uk
Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.38-4)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.38-4 to unstable this week, including the upstream stable release 2.6.38.4. There should be no ABI bump (contrary to my previous message on -kernel). Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.38-3)
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 23:35 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Version 2.6.38-2 had build failures on a couple of architectures. We now have fixes for those, and a few other bugs. There is no pending stable update for 2.6.38, so I intend to upload this in about 24 hours' time if there are no objections. 2.6.38-3 migrated to testing during tonight's britney run. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1302474427.4931.9285.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.38-3)
Version 2.6.38-2 had build failures on a couple of architectures. We now have fixes for those, and a few other bugs. There is no pending stable update for 2.6.38, so I intend to upload this in about 24 hours' time if there are no objections. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.38-2)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.38-2 early next week, incorporating upstream stable releases 2.6.38.1 and .2. This will bump the ABI number to 2 (so I will also upload linux-latest-2.6). It will fix the FTBFS on mips, and if nothing else is broken then it should be able to progress into testing. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.38-1)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.38-1 to unstable shortly after the upstream release, along with corresponding versions of linux-kbuild-2.6 and linux-latest-2.6. This should then progress into testing. The kernel team is discussing removal of the i386/686 flavour and renaming one or both of the remaining 32-bit flavours. If we can agree on what to do before upstream version 2.6.38, this change will be made in 2.6.38-1; otherwise it will be deferred. I will provide a patch for debian-installer kernel selection if necessary. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-31) for point release 6.0.1
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 05:18, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: ... That should be fine. That gives us time to include longterm release 2.6.32.30 and pick up a few other bug fixes. It would be nice if it can be done before since I'll do a surgery on 26th and need to travel for it on 24th or 25th. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTimoueanxN+CjQGSFLN3i0H1=euk5pbou0_9k...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-31) for point release 6.0.1
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: ... I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild the installer with the new kernel version, addressing the known issues with the kernel used in 6.0.0. Please could you let me know what the deadline is for that? ... It depends on the ETA for 6.0.1. I'd a week before the targeted date assuming it builds fine on all arches. For a confort level, I'd say a cuple of weeks like a good time for we to update the installer for it. OK, so what's the targeted date? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110301181903.gg19...@decadent.org.uk
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-31) for point release 6.0.1
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 18:19, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote: It depends on the ETA for 6.0.1. I'd a week before the targeted date assuming it builds fine on all arches. For a confort level, I'd say a cuple of weeks like a good time for we to update the installer for it. OK, so what's the targeted date? It doesn't depends on me. It is RMs' call. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=qj43n57nyn9zod8vmjngugykne3hum5rl_...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-31) for point release 6.0.1
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 18:19 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: ... I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild the installer with the new kernel version, addressing the known issues with the kernel used in 6.0.0. Please could you let me know what the deadline is for that? ... It depends on the ETA for 6.0.1. I'd a week before the targeted date assuming it builds fine on all arches. For a confort level, I'd say a cuple of weeks like a good time for we to update the installer for it. OK, so what's the targeted date? We're still working out the precise details, but the general plan is to aim for 6.0.1 being during FTPMaster's upcoming meeting in Essen. That starts on the 21st so, working backwards, two weeks would take us to the coming weekend. If it's possible to get the source upload in by the end of the weekend, that would be great. Hopefully getting all the builds in for squeeze quickly will be no problem; we sometimes ended up cutting things rather fine in the past for lenny (e.g. arm taking several days to build and a race condition somewhere in the build setup process which meant some architectures needed three attempts at the build for some uploads). Otavio: other than lkdi and the d-i build itself (which I guess could be a binNMU this time?) which obviously need to come afterwards, are any of your other proposed uploads dependent on the timing of the kernel uploads? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1299007033.10572.59.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-31) for point release 6.0.1
* Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [2011-03-01 19:17]: Otavio: other than lkdi and the d-i build itself (which I guess could be a binNMU this time?) It cannot be a binNMU since there are at least two changes in debian-installer for squeeze. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110301195813.go1...@jirafa.cyrius.com
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-31) for point release 6.0.1
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 19:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 18:19 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: ... I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild the installer with the new kernel version, addressing the known issues with the kernel used in 6.0.0. Please could you let me know what the deadline is for that? ... It depends on the ETA for 6.0.1. I'd a week before the targeted date assuming it builds fine on all arches. For a confort level, I'd say a cuple of weeks like a good time for we to update the installer for it. OK, so what's the targeted date? We're still working out the precise details, but the general plan is to aim for 6.0.1 being during FTPMaster's upcoming meeting in Essen. That starts on the 21st so, working backwards, two weeks would take us to the coming weekend. If it's possible to get the source upload in by the end of the weekend, that would be great. [...] That should be fine. That gives us time to include longterm release 2.6.32.30 and pick up a few other bug fixes. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-31) for point release 6.0.1
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: ... I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild the installer with the new kernel version, addressing the known issues with the kernel used in 6.0.0. Please could you let me know what the deadline is for that? ... It depends on the ETA for 6.0.1. I'd a week before the targeted date assuming it builds fine on all arches. For a confort level, I'd say a cuple of weeks like a good time for we to update the installer for it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTikHqk+28JYqnis5RF1oLVgRvEBcjJH=ped8z...@mail.gmail.com
Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-31) for point release 6.0.1
Dann is currently occupied by family matters, so I am preparing to handle this stable update. I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild the installer with the new kernel version, addressing the known issues with the kernel used in 6.0.0. Please could you let me know what the deadline is for that? I've applied most of the remaining security fixes listed as needed in the kernel-sec repository. There are a few left which appear to have relatively minor impact. There are still many other reported bugs in 2.6.32-30 that look severe enough to merit a fix in a stable update. Some of them have identified upstream fixes. I hope to spend some time looking through these and applying fixes before uploading -31, but would really appreciate help from other kernel team members and any others willing to do bug triage. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 2.6.37-2 to unstable
I intend to upload linux-2.6 2.6.37-2 later this week, incorporating upstream stable release 2.6.37.2. This will include an ABI bump. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 2.6.37-1 to unstable
On 02/08/2011 04:16 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: AUFS will be included for use in Debian Live if there is a version compatible with 2.6.37. is available, see upstreams repository at http://git.c3sl.ufpr.br/gitweb?p=aufs/aufs2-2.6.git -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d539d64.7020...@progress-technologies.net
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 2.6.37-1 to unstable
On mar., 2011-02-08 at 15:16 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and will not come back. OpenVZ and VServer users should migrate to LXC (Linux containers, using the cgroups and namespace features). Xen support in mainline Linux is improving and it should be usable as the dom0 kernel soon. What about the Grsecurity featureset? -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1297273042.27728.11.camel@oban
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 2.6.37-1 to unstable
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:37:22PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On mar., 2011-02-08 at 15:16 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and will not come back. OpenVZ and VServer users should migrate to LXC (Linux containers, using the cgroups and namespace features). Xen support in mainline Linux is improving and it should be usable as the dom0 kernel soon. What about the Grsecurity featureset? Well, I had thought that was ready to add, but Bastian raised some issues that you'll have to answer first. Sorry for raising your hopes on that. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110209174748.gh21...@decadent.org.uk
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 2.6.37-1 to unstable
On mer., 2011-02-09 at 17:47 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:37:22PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On mar., 2011-02-08 at 15:16 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and will not come back. OpenVZ and VServer users should migrate to LXC (Linux containers, using the cgroups and namespace features). Xen support in mainline Linux is improving and it should be usable as the dom0 kernel soon. What about the Grsecurity featureset? Well, I had thought that was ready to add, but Bastian raised some issues that you'll have to answer first. Sorry for raising your hopes on that. No problem, though I've replied to the comments and am waiting for some replies. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1297274466.27728.12.camel@oban
Uploading linux-2.6 2.6.37-1 to unstable
I intend to upload linux-2.6 and linux-kbuild-2.6 based on upstream version 2.6.37, later this week. linux-latest-2.6 will also be updated. Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and will not come back. OpenVZ and VServer users should migrate to LXC (Linux containers, using the cgroups and namespace features). Xen support in mainline Linux is improving and it should be usable as the dom0 kernel soon. AUFS will be included for use in Debian Live if there is a version compatible with 2.6.37. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110208151623.gd21...@decadent.org.uk
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 2.6.37-1 to unstable
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes: Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and will not come back. Does this mean that it would be a good day to start testing the dom0 support of plain 2.6.37 to make sure regressions will be minimal? (I am assuming 2.6.37 does support dom0 now). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84aai6xx21@sauna.l.org
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 2.6.37-1 to unstable
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 07:20:38PM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes: Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and will not come back. Does this mean that it would be a good day to start testing the dom0 support of plain 2.6.37 to make sure regressions will be minimal? (I am assuming 2.6.37 does support dom0 now). The backend drivers have not yet been merged, so it's not yet very useful as dom0. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110208180237.ge21...@decadent.org.uk
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 2.6.37-1 to unstable
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes: The backend drivers have not yet been merged, so it's not yet very useful as dom0. ok. Is there still hope that they will get merged before wheezy is released or would now be a good time to start looking at KVM migration plans? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8462suxspr@sauna.l.org
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 2.6.37-1 to unstable
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 08:54:24PM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes: The backend drivers have not yet been merged, so it's not yet very useful as dom0. ok. Is there still hope that they will get merged before wheezy is released or would now be a good time to start looking at KVM migration plans? I think they will, e.g. netback is going through review now and I would expect it to be merged in time for 2.6.39. Apparently Linux 2.6.38 will have enough functionality in dom0 that blkback and netback can be implemented in userland in qemu. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110208191432.gf21...@decadent.org.uk
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 2.6.37-1 to unstable
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 19:14 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 08:54:24PM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes: The backend drivers have not yet been merged, so it's not yet very useful as dom0. ok. Is there still hope that they will get merged before wheezy is released or would now be a good time to start looking at KVM migration plans? I think they will, e.g. netback is going through review now and I would expect it to be merged in time for 2.6.39. Yes, I'm actively working on it and hope to get it in for 2.6.39. Apparently Linux 2.6.38 will have enough functionality in dom0 that blkback and netback can be implemented in userland in qemu. I think that's the case, yes. The qemu-xen in Squeeze doesn't have the backends, in case someone was planning to try a new kernel on Squeeze. Ian. -- Ian Campbell A mouse is an elephant built by the Japanese. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-30)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-30 on Monday or Tuesday. This will include many bug fixes from longterm release 2.6.32.28 and elsewhere. There is no ABI bump. One of the bug fixes changes the ABI of the Socket Control Message interface used to support passing file descriptors through AF_UNIX and AF_NETLINK sockets, but we believe that this is not used by OOT modules. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-29 once stable release 2.6.32.27 is out, probably Thursday or Friday. This includes a large number of security fixes, so I intend to set urgency=high. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 16:57:02 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: I intend to upload a new version of linux-2.6 (2.6.32-24) on Tuesday night or Wednesday morning. This will include stable update 2.6.32.23 which has a number of security fixes, therefore urgency will be 'high'. Unblocked. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Uploading linux-2.6
I intend to upload a new version of linux-2.6 (2.6.32-24) on Tuesday night or Wednesday morning. This will include stable update 2.6.32.23 which has a number of security fixes, therefore urgency will be 'high'. Let me know if there's anything that I should wait for. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100927155702.gb13...@decadent.org.uk
Uploading linux-2.6
As soon as 2.6.32-20 is in testing, I intend to upload 2.6.32-21 with priority 'high'. This incorporates the upstream stable updates 2.6.32.19 and 2.6.32.20, including the fix for CVE-2010-2240 (except in the xen featureset). Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-20)
Am Mittwoch, den 11.08.2010, 04:28 +0100 schrieb Ben Hutchings: I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable on Wednesday evening or Thursday morning (GMT+1). This should fix the FTBFS, and contains many other bug fixes besides. Let me know if there's anything I should wait for. If it is not too much trouble for you, could you wait until thursday morning? I'm doing a git bisect for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592187 that will probably take until tonight; if I find a single cause for it I'd love to see the patch applied! -- Lukas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1281534305.11319.315.ca...@larosa.fritz.box
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-20)
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 15:45 +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 11.08.2010, 04:28 +0100 schrieb Ben Hutchings: I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable on Wednesday evening or Thursday morning (GMT+1). This should fix the FTBFS, and contains many other bug fixes besides. Let me know if there's anything I should wait for. If it is not too much trouble for you, could you wait until thursday morning? I'm doing a git bisect for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592187 that will probably take until tonight; if I find a single cause for it I'd love to see the patch applied! Even if you find the cause, that is not the same as finding a fix. It looks like we'll be making another upload soon, as there is another stable update on the way. So I'm not going to wait for this. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-20)
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable on Wednesday evening or Thursday morning (GMT+1). This should fix the FTBFS, and contains many other bug fixes besides. Let me know if there's anything I should wait for. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6
linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-18 should transition to testing in 2 days. Following that, I intend to upload 2.6.32-19 incorporating stable release 2.6.32.17 and DRM changes from stable release 2.6.33.7. I also intend to upload 2.6.35 to experimental shortly. Shout if there's anything I should wait for. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
I intend to upload a new version of linux-2.6 this weekend, incorporating stable releases 2.6.32.16 and (for drm drivers) 2.6.33.6. This does not appear to require an ABI bump. Shout if there's anything I should wait for. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Uploading linux-2.6 2.6.32-12
I intend to upload linux-2.6 2.6.32-12 tomorrow. This includes various ABI changes, so the ABI version will be bumped to 5. Propagation to testing is currently blocked by bug #572618, which is not fixed by this version, but I do have a briefly-tested fix from upstream and hope to get confirmation soon that this or some similar change will be safe to apply. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 20:19 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: * Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk) [100125 20:14]: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:02:31PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: * Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100125 19:27]: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release unless it gets a stable ABI (versioning) and should block the kernel from migrating for the time being? The 2.6.30 kernel and the current 2.6.32 one aren't candidates either, so I'm not sure what difference blocking the next one makes. That our testing users don't have to life with strange error messages they wouldn't get if the abi would be bumped properly. OK, maybe we should start numbering ABIs with this next version. I'd appreciate that very much. There has been some argument over whether we should do this or not. Bastian and Max seem to think that many more ABI-changing config changes will still be needed and do not want to start numbering yet. I'm not convinced that changing the ABI number repeatedly in testing/unstable will even hurt that much since we no longer have to worry about dependent module packages in the archive. It may add to cruft on users' systems but this can be fixed after a reboot with 'apt-get autoremove'. I do want to see this argument resolved before building and uploading, but I also don't want to hold back security and stability fixes. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings You can't have everything. Where would you put it? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Uploading linux-2.6
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:50:16PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 20:19 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: * Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk) [100125 20:14]: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:02:31PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: * Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100125 19:27]: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release unless it gets a stable ABI (versioning) and should block the kernel from migrating for the time being? The 2.6.30 kernel and the current 2.6.32 one aren't candidates either, so I'm not sure what difference blocking the next one makes. That our testing users don't have to life with strange error messages they wouldn't get if the abi would be bumped properly. OK, maybe we should start numbering ABIs with this next version. I'd appreciate that very much. There has been some argument over whether we should do this or not. Bastian and Max seem to think that many more ABI-changing config changes will still be needed seems likely and do not want to start numbering yet. I'm not convinced that changing the ABI number repeatedly in testing/unstable will even hurt that much since we no longer have to worry about dependent module packages in the archive. It may add to cruft on users' systems but this can be fixed after a reboot with 'apt-get autoremove'. yeah, i think people running sid/testing who do use oot modules shouldn't have much problem w/ frequent module rebuilds - esp if the abi is silently changing and they may really need to rebuild anyway. [Like with a module on my mythbox recently :)] I do want to see this argument resolved before building and uploading, but I also don't want to hold back security and stability fixes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Uploading linux-2.6
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Luk Claes wrote: Ben Hutchings wrote: There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes. Therefore I propose to upload with the changes from 2.6.32.6 once that's released. (Still no stable ABI, sorry.) If the ABI changed the package name will change, right? Will it become trunk2? no, trunk has no ABI guarantee. you can bet that each upload has a different one. once libata is used and the configs all set we can go for stable numbering. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Uploading linux-2.6
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:48:04AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Luk Claes wrote: Ben Hutchings wrote: There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes. Therefore I propose to upload with the changes from 2.6.32.6 once that's released. (Still no stable ABI, sorry.) If the ABI changed the package name will change, right? Will it become trunk2? no, trunk has no ABI guarantee. you can bet that each upload has a different one. once libata is used and the configs all set we can go for stable numbering. Sorry, but your package is in testing now. Please bump the ABI number in whatever why you want, but you should. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Uploading linux-2.6
Philipp Kern wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:48:04AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Luk Claes wrote: Ben Hutchings wrote: There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes. Therefore I propose to upload with the changes from 2.6.32.6 once that's released. (Still no stable ABI, sorry.) If the ABI changed the package name will change, right? Will it become trunk2? no, trunk has no ABI guarantee. you can bet that each upload has a different one. once libata is used and the configs all set we can go for stable numbering. Sorry, but your package is in testing now. Please bump the ABI number in whatever why you want, but you should. I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release unless it gets a stable ABI (versioning) and should block the kernel from migrating for the time being? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Uploading linux-2.6
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release unless it gets a stable ABI (versioning) and should block the kernel from migrating for the time being? The 2.6.30 kernel and the current 2.6.32 one aren't candidates either, so I'm not sure what difference blocking the next one makes. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
