I'm intending to release Linux 3.2.19 later today. The complete release
(files uploaded) depends on Greg K-H and probably won't be done until
later in the week, but we don't use pristine tarballs so this doesn't
hold up a Debian upload. It will include the usual mixture of security
fixes, other
I intend to release Linux 3.2.18 on Sunday, and then upload linux-2.6
version 3.2.18-1 to unstable. The upstream changes include quite a few
stability and security fixes, but this update will be much smaller than
3.2.17. Debian changes include some new hardware support. No ABI
change should be
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (19/05/2012):
I intend to release Linux 3.2.18 on Sunday, and then upload linux-2.6
version 3.2.18-1 to unstable. The upstream changes include quite a few
stability and security fixes, but this update will be much smaller than
3.2.17. Debian changes include
I intend to release Linux 3.2.17 on Saturday and then upload linux-2.6
version 3.2.17-1 to unstable. This includes a large number of bug
fixes. No ABI change should be necessary.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans.
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable this weekend. This includes
various important fixes from upstream stable version 3.2.16, a few more
bug fixes, and the addition of 'EFI stub' support on x86 (cherry-picked
from 3.3). There should be no ABI bump.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
I haven't lost my
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:48:11 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Would it be possible to accelerate testing migration of 3.2.14-1, so
that that happens before it's replaced by 3.2.15-1?
Set to 8 days instead of 10.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:11:59 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:48:11 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Would it be possible to accelerate testing migration of 3.2.14-1, so
that that happens before it's replaced by 3.2.15-1?
Set to 8 days instead of 10.
And
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 13:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:11:59 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:48:11 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Would it be possible to accelerate testing migration of 3.2.14-1, so
that that happens before it's
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.15-1 during this weekend. This
includes various important fixes from upstream stable version 3.2.15,
and may have urgency=high (to be decided). There should not be any ABI
bump.
Would it be possible to accelerate testing migration of 3.2.14-1, so
that
Another week, another stable update. Linux 3.2.14 will have a large
number of important bug fixes.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because
they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchett
signature.asc
Description: This
Hi folks
I intend to upload linux-2.6 3.2.13-1 later this evening. It should fix
s390x build.
Bastian
--
Those who hate and fight must stop themselves -- otherwise it is not stopped.
-- Spock, Day of the Dove, stardate unknown
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Another week, another kernel version. More important security and other
fixes from upstream, and a fix for the FTBFS on s390(x).
I don't believe any ABI bump is required.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Life would be so much easier if we could look at the source code.
signature.asc
Description: This
There will be an upload of linux-2.6 version 3.2.10-1 to unstable
shortly. This will include upstream stable release 3.2.10 which fixes
a local DoS bug, CVE-2012-1097, and will therefore have high urgency.
It should also fix some serious regressions in the realtime featureset.
It doesn't look
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable tomorrow or Monday. Version
3.2.9-1 will include upstream stable updates 3.2.8 and 3.2.9 which fix
various bugs, some of them quite serious. It should fix the FTBFS on
some architectures in 3.2.7-1.
There will be an ABI bump.
The link security
Ben,
am Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 05:42:28PM + hast du folgendes geschrieben:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable tomorrow or Monday. Version
3.2.9-1 will include upstream stable updates 3.2.8 and 3.2.9 which fix
various bugs, some of them quite serious. It should fix the FTBFS on
some
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 20:22 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
Ben,
am Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 05:42:28PM + hast du folgendes geschrieben:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable tomorrow or Monday. Version
3.2.9-1 will include upstream stable updates 3.2.8 and 3.2.9 which fix
various bugs,
Hi folks
I intend to upload linux-2.6 3.2.7-1 tomorrow, after 3.2.6-1 landed
recently in testing.
Appart from the new upstream stable release, this includes several
config changes. Hopefully it does not contain more changes to the ABI
then already found.
Bastian
--
Vulcans do not approve of
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.6-1 to unstable tomorrow. This
includes a large number of fixes from upstream stable release 3.2.6. It
also adds a realtime configuration for i386 (rt-686-pae).
There is no ABI change.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Beware of programmers who carry
Hi
I intend to upload linux-2.6 3.2.4-1 later today. It fixes the mips
FTBFS and also includes the pci-e power management (aspm) rework.
Bastian
--
Love sometimes expresses itself in sacrifice.
-- Kirk, Metamorphosis, stardate 3220.3
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 14:06 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.2-1 to unstable shortly. This
should fix the FTBFS on armel and various other bugs.
SUBLEVEL = 4
And maybe we can fix the FTBFS on mips and finally get 3.2 into testing.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 18:38 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 14:06 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.2-1 to unstable shortly. This
should fix the FTBFS on armel and various other bugs.
SUBLEVEL = 4
And maybe we can fix the FTBFS on
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.2-1 to unstable shortly. This
should fix the FTBFS on armel and various other bugs.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Lowery's Law:
If it jams, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Hi Ben,
Ben Hutchings wrote:
I wonder which kernel is targeted for Wheezy. According to
http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/stable-status-01-2012.html neither 3.1
nor 3.2 will be longterm supported kernels while 3.0 will get longterm
support by upstream.
IIRC there was once at least the
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this
week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first
upstream stable update.
The packaging and configuration changes include:
- [amd64] reenable rt featureset (not available for Linux 3.1)
- Use xz compression
Hi Ben,
Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this
week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first
upstream stable update.
I wonder which kernel is targeted for Wheezy. According to
On 16/01/12 01:55, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hi Ben,
Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this
week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first
upstream stable update.
I wonder which kernel is targeted for Wheezy. According
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 01:55 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hi Ben,
Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this
week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first
upstream stable update.
I wonder which kernel is targeted
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable later this week, once upstream
stable update 3.1.8 is released.
Linux 3.2 is also likely to be released very soon, but I think we still
have some work to do on updating the configuration for it.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Make three consecutive correct
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.1.5-1 to unstable this weekend.
This is another upstream stable update. It also includes a fix for the
FTBFS on mips/mipsel in 3.1.4-1.
No ABI bump seems to be necessary.
Ben.
Shouldn't that be linux-3 or
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.1.5-1 to unstable this weekend.
This is another upstream stable update. It also includes a fix for the
FTBFS on mips/mipsel in 3.1.4-1.
No ABI bump seems to be necessary.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 01:39:37AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 01:30 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Are there any large blockers for uploading 3.1.2-1? I know about
generated headers, where a fix is being tested.
No blockers, but 3.1.3 is due any minute now.
Okay. I
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:34:18PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 01:39:37AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 01:30 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Are there any large blockers for uploading 3.1.2-1? I know about
generated headers, where a fix is being
Hi
Are there any large blockers for uploading 3.1.2-1? I know about
generated headers, where a fix is being tested.
Bastian
--
Hailing frequencies open, Captain.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 01:30 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi
Are there any large blockers for uploading 3.1.2-1? I know about
generated headers, where a fix is being tested.
No blockers, but 3.1.3 is due any minute now.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The two most common things in the universe are
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 01:56:46AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.1.0-1 to sid this weekend.
This will include stable update 3.1.1 and fixes for the FTBFS in sid
(powerpc) and experimental (armel, powerpc). It will be built with
gcc-4.6, the default
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 14:38 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 01:56:46AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.1.0-1 to sid this weekend.
This will include stable update 3.1.1 and fixes for the FTBFS in sid
(powerpc) and experimental (armel,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 04:49:57PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 14:38 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
What now. 3.1.0-1 or 3.1.1-1?
Calling it 3.1.1-1 means another new orig tarball and won't avoid
confusion when we apply further stable updates without bumping the
upstream
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 07:34:25PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 04:49:57PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 14:38 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
What now. 3.1.0-1 or 3.1.1-1?
Calling it 3.1.1-1 means another new orig tarball and won't avoid
confusion
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:57:06PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 07:34:25PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
One orig per stable version was the plan.
I'm not sure we're ready to do that yet. We certainly won't be able
to do that during a (Debian) stable release as the old
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.1.0-1 to sid this weekend.
This will include stable update 3.1.1 and fixes for the FTBFS in sid
(powerpc) and experimental (armel, powerpc). It will be built with
gcc-4.6, the default compiler version for wheezy.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The program is
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-6 to unstable today
(Tuesday). This will include stable updates 3.0.7 and 3.0.8 and may
require an ABI change (I haven't checked yet). It should fix the
missing kernel-image udebs in 3.0.0-5, among other things.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Computers are
Hello Ben,
2011/9/29 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-5 to unstable later this
week. This will include stable update 3.0.5 and may require an ABI
change (I haven't checked yet). It should fix the FTBFS on some
architectures in 3.0.0-4 (but other
[Dropping debian-boot.]
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 04:00:10PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
Hello Ben,
2011/9/29 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-5 to unstable later this
week. This will include stable update 3.0.5 and may require an ABI
change (I
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 00:15, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
...
Assuming that we don't find any more problems with the changes in
experimental to use kernel-wedge, I will apply those to unstable as
well. I'll need to upload kernel-wedge yet again with Joey's fix for
the bug that
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-5 to unstable later this
week. This will include stable update 3.0.5 and may require an ABI
change (I haven't checked yet). It should fix the FTBFS on some
architectures in 3.0.0-4 (but other changes may introduce new failures).
Assuming that we don't
I intend to upload a new version of linux-2.6 to unstable tomorrow.
This will include upstream stable update 3.0.4 and various other bug
fixes. It should not involve an ABI bump.
Let me know if there is anything this should wait for.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Power corrupts. Absolute power is
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-3 to unstable on Friday or
Saturday.
This will include the fixes from stable release 3.0.3 and should fix the
FTBFS on mips mipsel.
There should be no ABI bump.
Ben.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-2 to unstable on Monday or
Tuesday.
This will include the fixes from stable releases 3.0.1 and 3.0.2 and
rt release 3.0.1-rt8 (or later). Also, linux-libc-dev will support
multi-arch.
There should be no ABI bump. However, note that the ABI for
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 19:45 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 03:05:37PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-1 to unstable tomorrow.
* Make gcc-4.5 the default compiler (except for alpha, hppa and m68k)
This change got reverted
On sam., 2011-07-23 at 15:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
If it's ready in time, we may also be able to add an 'rt' (real-time)
featureset, initially for amd64 only.
So featuresets are still somewhat supported / acceptable?
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 17:24 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On sam., 2011-07-23 at 15:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
If it's ready in time, we may also be able to add an 'rt' (real-time)
featureset, initially for amd64 only.
So featuresets are still somewhat supported / acceptable?
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk schrieb:
--=-oAGGyietHuyp77ujkKt4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 17:24 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On sam., 2011-07-23 at 15:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
If it's ready in
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-1 to unstable tomorrow.
Aside from upstream changes, the main changes are:
* [x86] block, xen: Enable XEN_BLKDEV_BACKEND as module
- This means x86 kernels (except for the 486 flavour) are now
suitable for running in Xen dom0
* Make gcc-4.5
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 03:05:37PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-1 to unstable tomorrow.
* Make gcc-4.5 the default compiler (except for alpha, hppa and m68k)
This change got reverted somehow. And we want to go to 4.6 pretty fast.
Bastian
--
... The
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.39-3 to unstable on Monday.
This will include stable update 2.6.39.2. It doesn't appear to require
an ABI bump.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Never attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by stupidity.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
To: Debian kernel maintainers debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Subject: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.39-2)
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable early this week. This will
include stable update
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable early this week. This will
include stable update 2.6.39.1 and restoration of aufs support for use
in Debian Live.
Stable update 2.6.39.1 includes an ABI change, so we will probably have
to change the binary package names.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a
I intend to upload linux-2.6 verson 2.6.38-5 tomorrow. This will
incorporate 2.6.38.5, which fixes numerous bugs including local
privilege escalation bugs in the agp driver (CVE-2011-1745,
CVE-2011-1746).
Let me know if there's anything I should wait for.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.38-4 to unstable this week,
including the upstream stable release 2.6.38.4.
Linux 2.6.38.4 appears to include some ABI changes so we may need to
bump the ABI number.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.38-4 to unstable this week,
including the upstream stable release 2.6.38.4.
There should be no ABI bump (contrary to my previous message on -kernel).
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 23:35 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Version 2.6.38-2 had build failures on a couple of architectures. We
now have fixes for those, and a few other bugs. There is no pending
stable update for 2.6.38, so I intend to upload this in about 24 hours'
time if there are no
Version 2.6.38-2 had build failures on a couple of architectures. We
now have fixes for those, and a few other bugs. There is no pending
stable update for 2.6.38, so I intend to upload this in about 24 hours'
time if there are no objections.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up,
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.38-2 early next week,
incorporating upstream stable releases 2.6.38.1 and .2.
This will bump the ABI number to 2 (so I will also upload
linux-latest-2.6). It will fix the FTBFS on mips, and if nothing else
is broken then it should be able to progress into
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.38-1 to unstable shortly after
the upstream release, along with corresponding versions of
linux-kbuild-2.6 and linux-latest-2.6. This should then progress into
testing.
The kernel team is discussing removal of the i386/686 flavour and
renaming one or both
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 05:18, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
...
That should be fine. That gives us time to include longterm release
2.6.32.30 and pick up a few other bug fixes.
It would be nice if it can be done before since I'll do a surgery on
26th and need to travel for it on
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
...
I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild
the installer with the new kernel version, addressing the known issues
with
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 18:19, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
It depends on the ETA for 6.0.1. I'd a week before the targeted date
assuming it builds fine on all arches. For a confort level, I'd say a
cuple of weeks
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 18:19 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
...
I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild
the installer with
* Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [2011-03-01 19:17]:
Otavio: other than lkdi and the d-i build itself (which I guess could be
a binNMU this time?)
It cannot be a binNMU since there are at least two changes in
debian-installer for squeeze.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 19:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 18:19 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
...
I know that I need to upload
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
...
I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild
the installer with the new kernel version, addressing the known issues
with the kernel used in 6.0.0. Please could you let me know what the
Dann is currently occupied by family matters, so I am preparing to
handle this stable update.
I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild
the installer with the new kernel version, addressing the known issues
with the kernel used in 6.0.0. Please could you let me know
I intend to upload linux-2.6 2.6.37-2 later this week, incorporating
upstream stable release 2.6.37.2.
This will include an ABI bump.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
-
On 02/08/2011 04:16 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
AUFS will be included for use in Debian Live if there is a version
compatible with 2.6.37.
is available, see upstreams repository at
http://git.c3sl.ufpr.br/gitweb?p=aufs/aufs2-2.6.git
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562
On mar., 2011-02-08 at 15:16 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and
will not come back. OpenVZ and VServer users should migrate to LXC
(Linux containers, using the cgroups and namespace features). Xen
support in mainline Linux is
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:37:22PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On mar., 2011-02-08 at 15:16 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and
will not come back. OpenVZ and VServer users should migrate to LXC
(Linux containers, using the
On mer., 2011-02-09 at 17:47 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:37:22PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On mar., 2011-02-08 at 15:16 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and
will not come back. OpenVZ and VServer
I intend to upload linux-2.6 and linux-kbuild-2.6 based on upstream
version 2.6.37, later this week. linux-latest-2.6 will also be
updated.
Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and
will not come back. OpenVZ and VServer users should migrate to LXC
(Linux containers,
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and
will not come back.
Does this mean that it would be a good day to start testing the dom0
support of plain 2.6.37 to make sure regressions will be minimal? (I
am assuming 2.6.37 does
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 07:20:38PM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and
will not come back.
Does this mean that it would be a good day to start testing the dom0
support of plain
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
The backend drivers have not yet been merged, so it's not yet very
useful as dom0.
ok. Is there still hope that they will get merged before wheezy is
released or would now be a good time to start looking at KVM migration
plans?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 08:54:24PM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
The backend drivers have not yet been merged, so it's not yet very
useful as dom0.
ok. Is there still hope that they will get merged before wheezy is
released or would now be a
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 19:14 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 08:54:24PM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
The backend drivers have not yet been merged, so it's not yet very
useful as dom0.
ok. Is there still hope that
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-30 on Monday or Tuesday.
This will include many bug fixes from longterm release 2.6.32.28 and
elsewhere.
There is no ABI bump. One of the bug fixes changes the ABI of the
Socket Control Message interface used to support passing file
descriptors through
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-29 once stable release
2.6.32.27 is out, probably Thursday or Friday. This includes a large
number of security fixes, so I intend to set urgency=high.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 16:57:02 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload a new version of linux-2.6 (2.6.32-24) on Tuesday night
or Wednesday morning. This will include stable update 2.6.32.23 which has
a number of security fixes, therefore urgency will be 'high'.
Unblocked.
Cheers,
I intend to upload a new version of linux-2.6 (2.6.32-24) on Tuesday night
or Wednesday morning. This will include stable update 2.6.32.23 which has
a number of security fixes, therefore urgency will be 'high'.
Let me know if there's anything that I should wait for.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We
As soon as 2.6.32-20 is in testing, I intend to upload 2.6.32-21 with
priority 'high'. This incorporates the upstream stable updates
2.6.32.19 and 2.6.32.20, including the fix for CVE-2010-2240 (except in
the xen featureset).
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to
Am Mittwoch, den 11.08.2010, 04:28 +0100 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable on Wednesday evening or
Thursday morning (GMT+1). This should fix the FTBFS, and contains many
other bug fixes besides. Let me know if there's anything I should wait
for.
If it is not
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 15:45 +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 11.08.2010, 04:28 +0100 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable on Wednesday evening or
Thursday morning (GMT+1). This should fix the FTBFS, and contains many
other bug fixes besides. Let me
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable on Wednesday evening or
Thursday morning (GMT+1). This should fix the FTBFS, and contains many
other bug fixes besides. Let me know if there's anything I should wait
for.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes
linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-18 should transition to testing in 2 days.
Following that, I intend to upload 2.6.32-19 incorporating stable
release 2.6.32.17 and DRM changes from stable release 2.6.33.7.
I also intend to upload 2.6.35 to experimental shortly.
Shout if there's anything I should wait
I intend to upload a new version of linux-2.6 this weekend,
incorporating stable releases 2.6.32.16 and (for drm drivers) 2.6.33.6.
This does not appear to require an ABI bump.
Shout if there's anything I should wait for.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve
I intend to upload linux-2.6 2.6.32-12 tomorrow. This includes various
ABI changes, so the ABI version will be bumped to 5. Propagation to
testing is currently blocked by bug #572618, which is not fixed by this
version, but I do have a briefly-tested fix from upstream and hope to
get
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 20:19 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk) [100125 20:14]:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:02:31PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100125 19:27]:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:50:16PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 20:19 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk) [100125 20:14]:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:02:31PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100125
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
Ben Hutchings wrote:
There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due
early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes.
Therefore I propose to upload with the changes from 2.6.32.6 once that's
released.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:48:04AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
Ben Hutchings wrote:
There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due
early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes.
Therefore I propose to
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:48:04AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
Ben Hutchings wrote:
There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due
early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes.
Therefore
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release
unless it gets a stable ABI (versioning) and should block the kernel
from migrating for the time being?
The 2.6.30 kernel and the current 2.6.32 one aren't
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
