OK, I will do that.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
2013/5/7 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
I've updated the trunk branch in svn for Linux 3.9, so please go ahead
with this.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
If God had intended Man to program,
we'd have been born with serial I/O ports.
--
I've updated the trunk branch in svn for Linux 3.9, so please go ahead
with this.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
If God had intended Man to program,
we'd have been born with serial I/O ports.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
2013/4/2 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.org:
Then, the two candidates have come armmp and armv7.
Which do you like?
if there is no other opinions, I would want to decide on armmp.
armmp ++
Thanks!
--
Hello,
2013/4/2 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.org:
Then, the two candidates have come armmp and armv7.
Which do you like?
if there is no other opinions, I would want to decide on armmp.
armmp ++
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi, all.
Now, we are trying to determine the MP flavor of ARM in Debian.
Then, the two candidates have come armmp and armv7.
Which do you like?
if there is no other opinions, I would want to decide on armmp.
Best,
Nobuhiro
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 12:52 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:05 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
I think the question here is what the `uname -r` bit should be.
Specifically the $FLAVOUR in
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 08:42:49AM +, Tixy wrote:
A single multiplatform kernel can support both armv6 and armv7 (or armv4
+ armv5). I don't know if Debian plans to have separate versions for
each architecture version - there may be performance benefits to this -
in which case using armv6
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 08:44 +0100, Arnaud Patard wrote:
I already commented some days ago on debian-arm that currently
multiplatform support must wait. It is useless as usb support is
_broken_ on multiplatform. Hopefully,
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:05 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
I think the question here is what the `uname -r` bit should be.
Specifically the $FLAVOUR in 3.x.y-z-$FLAVOUR.
Woops, I missed that uname -r includes the flavour
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
Hi,
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 08:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your comment.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 08:35 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Package:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I would much prefer a name that will provide a more useful distinction
in future (and not be too long!). Perhaps it should refer to the CPU
requirement like the flavours for some other architectures.
How about the same scheme as on other
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 03:46 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 08:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
wrote:
[...]
In future all ARM kernels should be multi-platform, but I expect there
will still be
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 08:44 +0100, Arnaud Patard wrote:
I already commented some days ago on debian-arm that currently
multiplatform support must wait. It is useless as usb support is
_broken_ on multiplatform. Hopefully, Linaro devs seem back to work
and looks like we may have a patch merged
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 08:03 +, Tixy wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 03:46 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 08:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
wrote:
[...]
In future all ARM kernels should be
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 16:13 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I would much prefer a name that will provide a more useful distinction
in future (and not be too long!). Perhaps it should refer to the CPU
requirement like the flavours for some
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:05 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
I think the question here is what the `uname -r` bit should be.
Specifically the $FLAVOUR in 3.x.y-z-$FLAVOUR.
Woops, I missed that uname -r includes the flavour bit.
I think there is an argument for making the multiplatform case be the
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 08:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your comment.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 08:35 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Package: linux
Version: 3.8.2-1~experimental.1
Hi,
Thank you for your comment.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 08:35 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Package: linux
Version: 3.8.2-1~experimental.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
From linux 3.8, support of armada
Package: linux
Version: 3.8.2-1~experimental.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
From linux 3.8, support of armada 370/xp was added in arm.
This is classified into the armhf architecture of debian.
First I began and thought that an armada flavor would be added.
When I consulted about this in
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 08:35 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Package: linux
Version: 3.8.2-1~experimental.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
From linux 3.8, support of armada 370/xp was added in arm.
This is classified into the armhf architecture of debian.
First I began and thought
20 matches
Mail list logo
