Your message dated Mon, 30 Mar 2020 08:10:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953569: fixed in linux 5.5.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #953569,
regarding linux: please cherry-pick wireguard patches from 5.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Thanks! Looks good to me. I appreciate that you were able to
reconstruct the original upstream commits for each of these.
(WireGuard has a capital G btw.)
On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 00:01 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> It looks like you didn't actually take these patches from the updated
> tree I sent you, but rather used the outdated .zip I had posted prior.
> Please try again using the tree I linked earlier:
>
>
Hi again,
It looks like you didn't actually take these patches from the updated
tree I sent you, but rather used the outdated .zip I had posted prior.
Please try again using the tree I linked earlier:
https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux/log/?h=backport-5.5.y
Thanks,
Jason
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:18 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 03:21 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 22:23 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 8:52 PM Ben Hutchings
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 17:02 -0600, Jason A.
On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 03:21 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 22:23 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 8:52 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 17:02 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > > Please coordinate with me for doing this.
On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 22:23 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 8:52 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 17:02 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > Please coordinate with me for doing this. Actually, if this sounds
> > > interesting to you, I'll backport it
Hi Ben,
I continue to maintain and keep up to date the 5.5.y backport for
WireGuard for you. I don't know when you intend on merging this --
after 5.6 drops, I assume -- but I've updated the patches and I'm now
holding them in the wireguard-linux repo:
On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 19:04 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> By the way, do you want a patch series for 5.4 too? I can provide
> that as well.
Thanks, but I don't anticipate there being any further 5.4-based kernel
packages in Debian.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Tomorrow will be cancelled due to
By the way, do you want a patch series for 5.4 too? I can provide that as well.
On Tue 2020-03-10 22:23:18 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> https://data.zx2c4.com/wireguard-5.5.8-20a586ec4f5acf195f71caea55c5a33c574078cb69712da591467ffc08dd8b72.zip
Thanks, Jason!
> - A user is on stock Debian and runs `apt install wireguard`: only
> wireguard-tools is pulled in.
> - A user
On Wed 2020-03-11 03:50:00 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> If some of the packages providing a virtual package are explicitly
> installed, and some auto-installed, it could reasonably auto-remove the
> latter group (though I don't think it does). But if all of them are
> auto-installed, which will
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 8:52 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 17:02 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Please coordinate with me for doing this. Actually, if this sounds
> > interesting to you, I'll backport it myself, along with the missing
> > crypto/ bits, and send you a git
On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 23:31 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Thanks to Ben and Jason for following up here.
>
> On Wed 2020-03-11 02:52:43 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > We definitely can't add a Provides on "real" kernel packages, because
> > this breaks auto-removal of old packages.
>
>
Thanks to Ben and Jason for following up here.
On Wed 2020-03-11 02:52:43 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> We definitely can't add a Provides on "real" kernel packages, because
> this breaks auto-removal of old packages.
I'm not sure i understand this. by "real" kernel packages i think you
mean
On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 17:02 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Please coordinate with me for doing this. Actually, if this sounds
> interesting to you, I'll backport it myself, along with the missing
> crypto/ bits, and send you a git bundle of patches for 5.5.
>
> In other words, just say "yes
Please coordinate with me for doing this. Actually, if this sounds
interesting to you, I'll backport it myself, along with the missing
crypto/ bits, and send you a git bundle of patches for 5.5.
In other words, just say "yes please", and I'll supply the rest. Then
you can apply this to your tree
Package: src:linux
Severity: wishlist
Control: affects -1 src:wireguard-linux-compat src:wireguard
Hi Debian kernel folks--
Please cherry-pick the wireguard patches from Linux's 5.6 development
branch into future debian builds of 5.5 (and 5.4?) builds of the Linux
kernel.
The Wireguard VPN
18 matches
Mail list logo
