Hi ...
As you may have noticed, 2.6.15 was released upstream this night, and i did
prepare debian source packages at :
http://people.debian.org/~luther/2.6.15
Which i am building now and which should be uploadable at around noon,
provided someone with a fast box doesn't beat me to it.
They
Forgot to CC ftp-masters, ... i hope the address is correct and it reaches
them :)
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 09:07:09AM +0100, sven wrote:
Hi ...
As you may have noticed, 2.6.15 was released upstream this night, and i did
prepare debian source packages at :
Hey pat,
Want to generate 1.5 - 3.5k easily from the comfort
of your own home with minimal effort?
CaII me at : 800*645*2308
Payments are made daily.
Regards,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03.01.2006 08:58 you wrote:
In that case, it's the IDE chipset. I have replaced the hard drive, and
the problem is the same. I do not have any problems when running
Windows. A hard disk scan reveals no errors.
I have openend the bug again.
If you are sure the Bug is IDE-Kernel related
Markus Raab wrote:
I have openend the bug again.
Thanks.
If you are sure the Bug is IDE-Kernel related please use the latest unstable
kernel (best wait for 2.6.15).
Then give us more information, in detail give:
lscpi
lspci -n
dmesg
lsmod
And maybe interrupts. The hda: dma messages
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 08:23:32PM +0800, zzz haha wrote:
This is probably the now infamous ide-generic bug. what version of yaird or
initramfs-tools did you try ?
yaird ver. 0.0.12-3. but my self-compiled kernel does not use initrd.
ah, so the bug is your own fault :)
Please try the
yaird ver. 0.0.12-3. but my self-compiled kernel does not use initrd.
ah, so the bug is your own fault :)
?
my own kernel (no initrd) has dma enabled. the debian default one
cannot let me enable dma.
you mean that this version of yaird has error?
to be safer, i compiled the relevant ide
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 08:53:40PM +0800, zzz haha wrote:
yaird ver. 0.0.12-3. but my self-compiled kernel does not use initrd.
ah, so the bug is your own fault :)
?
my own kernel (no initrd) has dma enabled. the debian default one
cannot let me enable dma.
The debian default one is
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 08:53:40PM +0800, zzz haha wrote:
yaird ver. 0.0.12-3. but my self-compiled kernel does not use initrd.
ah, so the bug is your own fault :)
?
my own kernel (no initrd) has dma enabled. the debian default one
cannot let me enable dma.
you mean that this
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 02:29:29PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 08:53:40PM +0800, zzz haha wrote:
yaird ver. 0.0.12-3. but my self-compiled kernel does not use initrd.
ah, so the bug is your own fault :)
?
my own kernel (no initrd) has dma enabled.
linux-2.6_2.6.15-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.15-1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.15.orig.tar.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.15-1.diff.gz
linux-manual-2.6.15_2.6.15-1_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.15_2.6.15-1_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.15_2.6.15-1_all.deb
Hi Jean-Marc,
Can you please confirm that this issue should be closed, so that we can close
the bug report ?
Jurij said the bug was fixed in k-p 10.018, and both 2.6.14-7 and 2.6.15-1
where built with a more recent version of it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi, ...
I have been looking at the remaining linux-2.6 RC bug, in the wake of the
2.6.15 release.
There are 7 RC bugs remaining now :
#337493: linux-2.6 2.6.14 should not move to testing unexpectedly.
#343260: Grub: After installing linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 grub had wrong entries
#343443:
severity 343934 important
retitle 343934 please support mips
thanks
* Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-03 15:24]:
#343934: kernel-2.6: FTBFS on mips/experimental
Of these, #337493 ius artificial and can be closed anytime, #343260 is a
kernel-package/grub bug, #343443 and #343092 are
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:31:16PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
severity 343934 important
retitle 343934 please support mips
thanks
* Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-03 15:24]:
#343934: kernel-2.6: FTBFS on mips/experimental
Of these, #337493 ius artificial and can be
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
The fn-key on apple powerbook g4 doesnt work from scratch on linux 2.6.
There is a patch at:
https://hansmi.home.forkbomb.ch/public/usbhid-hook-try6.diff
Which enables the fn-key. It sends directly the right events from the
keyboard (for example PageUp from
reopen 343092
reassign 343092 grub
stop
grub needs to be debconfied to allow latest linux-images to install.
at least update-grub needs to write to stderr.
better control would use the debconf ENV var to check context.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
please try against lastest 2.6.14 in unstable,
tomorrow 2.6.15 should be available.
is the bug still reproducible?
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Can you please check if 2.6.12 (etch), 2.6.14 (sid) or 2.6.15 (sid tomorrow
evening) fix this bug (radeon oops on system halt), since there where numerous
radeonfb changes since the 2.6.11 kernel this was against and i have no such
problem on my powerbook which uses a similar radeon chip i
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 11:20:02PM +0200, Adam Szojda wrote:
Kernel oops while reading UDF formated DVD+RW disk. Tested on two disks:
one formated and burned with InCD on Windows and the other with linux
udftools... Both mounted standard way: mount -t udf /dev/hdc /tmp/1
pktcdvd module wasn't
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 03:09:04PM -0400, Marc Horowitz wrote:
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Marc Horowitz wrote:
can you try out if newer 2.6.12 fixed that nfs issue?
http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/
from the client side, but i guess you
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
from nfs(5):
soft If an NFS file operation has a major timeout then
report
an I/O error to the calling program. The default is
to
continue retrying NFS file operations indefinitely.
reassign 344205 linux-source-2.6.15
thanks
Roland Mas, 2005-12-20 22:19:44 +0100 :
Trying to build my kernel from the linux-source-2.6.14 package (and no
external patches), I get an error in drivers/net/wireless/airo.c.
Same happens with linux-source-2.6.15_2.6.15-1, so I'm reassigning.
I'm
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 09:24:19PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
N-117 = Mon 30 Jul 06: freeze essential toolchain, kernels
Why do you put the kernel together with the essential toolchain freeze, it
should be together with the rest of base, i believe.
N-110 = Mon 7 Aug 06: freeze base,
I'm unable to test the fix... But it should be fine.
Thanks.
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#323136: linux-kernel-2.6.12-k7: module dc395x causes kernel panic,
which was filed against the linux-2.6 package.
It has been closed
Hi,
thanks for your mail. I just want to point out that we published the
timeline already back in October, but of course, that shouldn't refrain
us from changing it if this is necessary. :)
[re-arranged the quote]
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060103 22:03]:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at
On 1/3/06, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you put the kernel together with the essential toolchain freeze, it
should be together with the rest of base, i believe.
[...]
We will have a kernel which is outdated by two versions at release time with
this plan, since there are about
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:02:05PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 09:24:19PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
N-117 = Mon 30 Jul 06: freeze essential toolchain, kernels
Why do you put the kernel together with the essential toolchain freeze, it
should be together with the rest
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 03:50:31PM +, Simon Waters wrote:
Seems this combination makes reboots less likely/predictable, but it is
yet to finish an entire CD.
Hi Simon!
Could you please retest this with a current linux image?
2.6.15 will enter unstable tomorrow.
If this still isn't fixed,
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:31:38PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
thanks for your mail. I just want to point out that we published the
timeline already back in October, but of course, that shouldn't refrain
us from changing it if this is necessary. :)
Yeah, i was already chidded (?) that
(forgot to CC d-kernel on this)
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 22:02, Sven Luther wrote:
We will have a kernel which is outdated by two versions at release time
with this plan, since there are about 1 kernel upstream release every 2
month.
2.6.8 is not an optimal kernel, but largely due to timing
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:32:12PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:02:05PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 09:24:19PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
N-117 = Mon 30 Jul 06: freeze essential toolchain, kernels
Why do you put the kernel together
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:01:03PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
(forgot to CC d-kernel on this)
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 22:02, Sven Luther wrote:
We will have a kernel which is outdated by two versions at release time
with this plan, since there are about 1 kernel upstream release every 2
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:26:02PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
On 1/3/06, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you put the kernel together with the essential toolchain freeze, it
should be together with the rest of base, i believe.
[...]
We will have a kernel which is
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 23:01, Sven Luther wrote:
Indeed. The d-i team usually says no outright to any kind of proposal
of this kind, so it is up to the kernel team to come up with an
implementation which convinces them :)
Bullshit.
We (d-i team, mainly Joey) gave very good reasons why we
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 08:09:45PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
Could you please retest this with a current linux image?
I'm on self built kernel-image-2.6.14 and everything seems OK.
(Same burner but different, freshly formated disc...)
2.6.15 will enter unstable tomorrow.
Hmm... I wanted to
Hi,
2006-01-03, k keltezéssel 22.16-kor Christian Aichinger ezt írta:
could you try out that bios workaround:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0403.1/1537.html
did you have time to test it? Did it work out?
To quote a former letter of mine:
Forwarded message
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:33:44PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 23:01, Sven Luther wrote:
Indeed. The d-i team usually says no outright to any kind of proposal
of this kind, so it is up to the kernel team to come up with an
implementation which convinces them :)
Sven Luther wrote:
Indeed. The d-i team usually says no outright to any kind of proposal of
this kind, so it is up to the kernel team to come up with an implementation
which convinces them :) The release team deserves to be informed about the
possibility though.
Cite message-ids or irc logs
Sven Luther wrote:
And have you added stable-security into the equation ? Your choices of back in
april are in part responsible for the abysmal situation in stable-security
with regard to kernels during these past months.
Pedantically speaking, fjp made no d-i release decisions last April.
If
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 23:52, Sven Luther wrote:
The current proposal is about simply using the same .udeb organisation
and move it inside the linux-2.6 common package, which is something
that works out just fine for ubuntu even, but which the current
linux-2.6 common package
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:09:18PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
And have you added stable-security into the equation ? Your choices of back
in
april are in part responsible for the abysmal situation in stable-security
with regard to kernels during these past months.
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:13:37AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 23:52, Sven Luther wrote:
The current proposal is about simply using the same .udeb organisation
and move it inside the linux-2.6 common package, which is something
that works out just fine for ubuntu
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:04:39PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Indeed. The d-i team usually says no outright to any kind of proposal of
this kind, so it is up to the kernel team to come up with an implementation
which convinces them :) The release team deserves to be informed
On Jan 04, Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to mention that 2.6.15 requires a newer udev. Who knows what other newer
things newer kernels might require.
OTOH, old kernel are buggy and out of date wrt modern hardware, and we
lack the manpower to backport for years fixes and new features
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Margarita Manterola wrote:
On 1/3/06, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you put the kernel together with the essential toolchain freeze, it
should be together with the rest of base, i believe.
[...]
We will have a kernel which is outdated by two versions at
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
Version: 2.6.14-7
Followup-For: Bug #345374
I have the same problem. When piix is loaded as a module, I am unable to
mess with DMA settings. However, when I compile piix statically, I can
set DMA without a hitch. This issue has been discussed on debian-user,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 00:24:04 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Without the current method sucks comments please; saying I
think the current situation could be improved by... is much more
likely to get positive reactions.)
This is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Jan 04, Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to mention that 2.6.15 requires a newer udev. Who knows what other newer
things newer kernels might require.
OTOH, old kernel are buggy and out of date wrt modern hardware, and we
lack the manpower
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 05:28:15PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
Not to mention that 2.6.15 requires a newer udev. Who knows what other newer
things newer kernels might require.
Notice that Linus recently expressed on LKML that udev and other userland
breakage on kernel upgrade is not to
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:43:28PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Jan 04, Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to mention that 2.6.15 requires a newer udev. Who knows what other
newer
things newer kernels might require.
OTOH, old kernel
Hi David!
On Monday 02 January 2006 21:24, David Schmitt wrote:
Dear Georg!
Could you please retest with a current kernel (testing:2.6.12,
unstable:2.6.14) and a current udev (= 0.076).
Using initramfs-tools for creating the initrd is probably a good idea too.
Unfortunately, I don't have
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:10:49AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
But yes, udev is the problematic case, altough i run 2.6.14 with sarge udev
and it works.
AFAIK it should work with the default ruleset. It breaks only with
certain custom rules due to a bug in the libsysfs version used by udev.
So,
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:43:13PM -0800, Garrett P. McLean wrote:
I have the same problem. When piix is loaded as a module, I am unable to
mess with DMA settings. However, when I compile piix statically, I can
set DMA without a hitch. This issue has been discussed on debian-user,
and I
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:17:20PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:31:16PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
severity 343934 important
retitle 343934 please support mips
thanks
* Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-03 15:24]:
#343934: kernel-2.6: FTBFS on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/03/2006 10:13 PM, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:43:28PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Jan 04, Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to mention that 2.6.15 requires a newer udev.
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:24:53 +0100, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Of these, #337493 ius artificial and can be closed anytime, #343260
is a kernel-package/grub bug,
Grub bug.
#343686 is a kernel-package issue
Umm, no. This is not a kernel-package issue. kernel-package
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:27:25PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:01:03PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
(forgot to CC d-kernel on this)
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 22:02, Sven Luther wrote:
We will have a kernel which is outdated by two versions at release time
with this
Hi Sven,
Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 01:04:39PM +1300, Srdjan wrote:
Hi Sven,
I'm not sure what is the pwc external driver package - I haven't
installed anything apart from the kernel in case of 2.6.14-2 and
additional modules for 2.6.14-1. Can you please tell me where do
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:23:31AM -0200, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
1. http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/3/55
Perhaps the idea of maintain a kernel with other distros is not bad,
if Ubuntu shows up as a candidate, I would like to add Progeny, Linspire,
Xandros, DCC Alliance
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:17:00PM +1300, Srdjan wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
additional modules ? What is it exactly you installed as additional
modules ?
pwc-modules-2.6.14-1-k7
Yes, except you would need the newer version, 2.6.14-2-k7, and soon
2.6.15-1-k7. I believe the fact that these
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:34:43PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:23:31AM -0200, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
1. http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/3/55
Perhaps the idea of maintain a kernel with other distros is not bad,
if Ubuntu shows up as a
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060103 23:02]:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:31:38PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
the other hand side, the difference is only one week - and if nothing is
broken by that, we can freeze the kernel at N-110 also.
i think comparing the kernel with the toolchain
63 matches
Mail list logo
