Bug#873176: linux-image-armmp-lpae: Please add module for DHT11/DHT22 sensors

2018-04-15 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Ben,

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 04:14:43PM +0200, Harald Geyer wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes:
> > Control: reassign -1 src:linux tag -1 moreinfo
> > This driver appears to depend on Device Tree properties, but none of the
> > DTBs we build set those properties. It's not clear to me how it would be
> > usable.

The situation is quite similar to #858975 where I asked for enabling
CONFIG_W1_MASTER_GPIO. In both cases, a device tree needs to supply the
information.

> That's a fair point. The user will need to either add a node to the DTB on
> his system or have the bootloader apply a device tree fragment on top of
> the DTB installed by debian, which would work well with automatic updates
> of the kernel. (Or load a device tree fragment from userspace once
> debian supports dynamic DT.)

I am actually using such a system and my present method is to update
Debian's device tree after installing kernels. It's not pretty, but good
enough for me.

> Since updating the DTB is a lot easier then compiling the module for
> every update of the debian linux package (and security updates usually
> don't change the DTB anyway), I still feel providing the module would
> be useful.

I fully agree here and second the request for CONFIG_DHT11. Enabling
this driver is another piece to shrinking the gap with Raspbian and
making Debian a viable alternative on these devices.

If you disagree here, you should revert #858975 for consistency's sake.

Helmut



Bug#873176: linux-image-armmp-lpae: Please add module for DHT11/DHT22 sensors

2017-09-25 Thread Harald Geyer
Ben Hutchings writes:
> Control: reassign -1 src:linux tag -1 moreinfo
> This driver appears to depend on Device Tree properties, but none of the
> DTBs we build set those properties. It's not clear to me how it would be
> usable.

That's a fair point. The user will need to either add a node to the DTB on
his system or have the bootloader apply a device tree fragment on top of
the DTB installed by debian, which would work well with automatic updates
of the kernel. (Or load a device tree fragment from userspace once
debian supports dynamic DT.)

Since updating the DTB is a lot easier then compiling the module for
every update of the debian linux package (and security updates usually
don't change the DTB anyway), I still feel providing the module would
be useful.

Thanks for considering my report,
Harald



Processed: Re: Bug#873176: linux-image-armmp-lpae: Please add module for DHT11/DHT22 sensors

2017-09-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 src:linux
Bug #873176 [linux-image-armmp-lpae] linux-image-armmp-lpae: Please add module 
for DHT11/DHT22 sensors
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-armmp-lpae' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as found in versions linux-latest/84.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #873176 to the same values 
previously set
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #873176 [src:linux] linux-image-armmp-lpae: Please add module for 
DHT11/DHT22 sensors
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
873176: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873176
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#873176: linux-image-armmp-lpae: Please add module for DHT11/DHT22 sensors

2017-09-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: reassign -1 src:linux
Control: tag -1 moreinfo

On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 12:30 +0200, Harald Geyer wrote:
> Package: linux-image-armmp-lpae
> Version: 4.12+84
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> the DHT22 sensors are quite popular temperature and humidity sensors. I'm
> the upstream driver author so I am biased but from my experience with bug
> reports many users seem to run custom compiled (and mostly outdated) kernels
> only because debian doesn't ship the kernel module for this sensor.
> 
> Also I'm switching my systems using these sensors from OpenWRT to debian
> ATM so I'm directly affeced by this as well.
> 
> Adding CONFIG_DHT11=m will be enough, however I'm less sure about the
> architectures to enable this: It will be mostly used on all variants of
> ARM but the driver works on any platform with native (ie fast enough for
> bit banging) GPIOs.

This driver appears to depend on Device Tree properties, but none of
the DTBs we build set those properties.  It's not clear to me how it
would be usable.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Make three consecutive correct guesses and you will be considered an
expert.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#873176: linux-image-armmp-lpae: Please add module for DHT11/DHT22 sensors

2017-08-25 Thread Harald Geyer
Package: linux-image-armmp-lpae
Version: 4.12+84
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

the DHT22 sensors are quite popular temperature and humidity sensors. I'm
the upstream driver author so I am biased but from my experience with bug
reports many users seem to run custom compiled (and mostly outdated) kernels
only because debian doesn't ship the kernel module for this sensor.

Also I'm switching my systems using these sensors from OpenWRT to debian
ATM so I'm directly affeced by this as well.

Adding CONFIG_DHT11=m will be enough, however I'm less sure about the
architectures to enable this: It will be mostly used on all variants of
ARM but the driver works on any platform with native (ie fast enough for
bit banging) GPIOs.

Thanks for your consideration,
Harald


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: armhf (armv7l)

Kernel: Linux 4.12.0-1-armmp-lpae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages linux-image-armmp-lpae depends on:
ii  linux-image-4.12.0-1-armmp-lpae  4.12.6-1

linux-image-armmp-lpae recommends no packages.

linux-image-armmp-lpae suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information