On 04-Apr-00, 17:27 (CDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunetly, it's not consistent with many of the non-DFSG-free
licenses. You'd be violating licenses if you did this with many of the
packages in non-free,
1. Non-free is not Debian. :-)
2. I'm not sure this is true. Don't we have to have
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 06:08:13PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 04-Apr-00, 17:27 (CDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunetly, it's not consistent with many of the non-DFSG-free
licenses. You'd be violating licenses if you did this with many of the
packages in non-free,
1. Non-free
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Andreas Voegele wrote:
Are the QPL and the LGPL compatible or should the Qt notice mentioned
at http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html also be used?
I have asked the author of the Python Bindings for Qt and KDE if he
could add the Qt notice
HI folks,
i just took over the dcd package and looked through the files
for copyright notices due to the old copyright file made by the
former maintainer. in this copyright a file is mentioned which is
public domain software. i don't know what's the way debian
handles this. below are the
Brian Kimball [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oops, I only thought of this after reading SScott's mail. Even if I'm
incorrect regarding the meaning of modified work as a whole, how could
one possibly violate the GPL if, as above, the GPLed work is not
distributed. After all, the GPL purports to
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 09:43:23AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
HI folks,
i just took over the dcd package and looked through the files
for copyright notices due to the old copyright file made by the
former maintainer. in this copyright a file is mentioned which is
public domain software.
SSchott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
3) If you attempt to defeat (2) by distributing the two functions
separately, or distributing only locate_inner_otter, and telling
users how to combine them to produce frob-otters, and there is no
way to make locate_inner_otter useful
Brian Kimball [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) If locate_inner_otter is not derived from find_outer_otter, but
you distribute binaries for frob-otters, then you must still give
the complete source code for both locate_inner_otter and
find_outer_otter. The reason is that the
I'm not sure. As I recall there might have been an issue
related to notifications (under Section 2.2 You May Deploy
Covered Code, provided...
c) if You Deploy Covered Code containing Modifications made
by You, inform others of how to obtain those Modifications by
filling out and submitting
9 matches
Mail list logo