On Dec 19, Brian Thomas Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No: it's reporting that the card did activate correctly, but it's not
the driver's fault. The driver is complete and does not lack anything
needed to operate the device.
...except the firmware?
No: the driver does not uses the
No: it's reporting that the card did activate correctly, but it's not
the driver's fault. The driver is complete and does not lack anything
needed to operate the device.
On Dec 19, Brian Thomas Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...except the firmware?
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Dec 19, Brian Thomas Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No: it's reporting that the card did activate correctly, but it's not
the driver's fault. The driver is complete and does not lack anything
needed to operate the device.
...except the
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb/wrote:
* Raul Miller:
I don't see anything in the GPL which requires source for things
which have been left out of the program being required.
The subsetted font is not the preferred form of doing modifications to
the font.
You don't distribute the
Hello,
As you may recall, I am (unofficially) maintaining the IRAF data
analysis package. IRAF includes NCAR from UCAR (.. Atmospheric
Research). It was previously decided [1] that the license from NCAR
was very much not DFSG-free.
However, the NCAR routines are now available under the GPL. I
Hi.
I've been referred to xdebug on #postgresql @ freenode, but I will try
to avoid it because:
(1) It's not in Debian
(2) The license is non-free
Although the license is non-free as in annoying more then in
philosophical,
(3) It's not even in the Debian's non-free section
AFAICT, the only
By the way,
I'm not subscribed, please Cc: me.
What kind of license is associated with code produced by Yacc?
Upstream IRAF apparently has a UNIX source license and uses a
modified yacc to produce two of the files. The source includes a
README:
This directory contains the source for
L.S.,
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004, Jan Minar wrote:
AFAICT, the only non-free section is:
quote href=http://www.xdebug.org/license.php;
4. Products derived from this software may not be called Xdebug, nor
may Xdebug appear in their name, without prior written permission from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is probably hotly debated, but how do math-algorthm copyrights
work?
There are lots of these:
== ./iraf/math/llsq/original_f/qrbd.f ==
c subroutine qrbd (ipass,q,e,nn,v,mdv,nrv,c,mdc,ncc)
c c.l.lawson and r.j.hanson, jet propulsion laboratory, 1973 jun 12
c to appear in 'solving
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 03:45:40PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
This is probably hotly debated, but how do math-algorthm copyrights
work?
Articles about mathematics, and specific expressions of algorithms,
are copyrightable, but the concepts aren't.
In
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 11:29:47PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
And this is probably the reason we have thousands of (probably
invalid) software patents instead.
Copyright law is only a minor part of that issue.
--
Raul
Hi!
* Jan Minar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [041219 20:04]:
AFAICT, the only non-free section is:
quote href=http://www.xdebug.org/license.php;
4. Products derived from this software may not be called Xdebug, nor
may Xdebug appear in their name, without prior written permission from
[EMAIL
Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
* Jan Minar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [041219 20:04]:
AFAICT, the only non-free section is:
quote href=http://www.xdebug.org/license.php;
4. Products derived from this software may not be called Xdebug, nor
may Xdebug appear in their name, without
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 11:38:16PM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
* Jan Minar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [041219 20:04]:
AFAICT, the only non-free section is:
quote href=http://www.xdebug.org/license.php;
4. Products derived from this software may not be called Xdebug, nor
may Xdebug appear
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 08:27:31PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
Excluding a singleton name is fine. I'd even go so far as to say any
excluding any countable set is fine. Excluding an uncountable class of
names is not.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/06/msg00023.html for a
Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Jan Minar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [041219 20:04]:
AFAICT, the only non-free section is:
quote href=http://www.xdebug.org/license.php;
4. Products derived from this software may not be called Xdebug, nor
may Xdebug appear in
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 08:59:06PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
Justin Pryzby wrote:
What kind of license is associated with code produced by Yacc?
Presuming this modified yacc isn't trivially replaceable with a Free
yacc, this would prevent these packages from being uploadable to main.
I
17 matches
Mail list logo
