On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 08:27:31PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > Excluding a singleton name is fine. I'd even go so far as to say any > excluding any countable set is fine. Excluding an uncountable class of > names is not.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/06/msg00023.html for a brief prior discussion of this. This clause is very poorly thought out, and I agree that it is clearly beyond the explicit scope of DFSG#4. It's not a battle I feel like fighting (in the general case), though. -- Glenn Maynard