On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 12:28:50PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Yes, they are annoying.
> Worse: they are non-free.
> As Don Armstrong explained more clearly than I did: they are a
> restriction on derivative works (DFSG#3) not explicitly allowed by
> DFSG#4.
Again--this has been said too many t
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 01:05:44PM +1100, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>>On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 01:50:32AM +0200, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
>>>Package: wnpp
>>>Severity: wishlist
>>>Owner: "Martin-??ric Racine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>>Package name : ispell-et
>>>Version
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 01:05:44PM +1100, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 01:50:32AM +0200, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
> >Package: wnpp
> >Severity: wishlist
> >Owner: "Martin-??ric Racine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Package name : ispell-et
> >Version : 20030606
> >URL
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 01:50:32AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>Package: wnpp
>Severity: wishlist
>Owner: "Martin-Ãric Racine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Package name : ispell-et
>Version : 20030606
>URL : http://www.meso.ee/~jjpp/speller/
>aspell-et - Estonian dictionary for aspel
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >The fact that it's a restriction on derived works (§3) that is not
> >explicitly allowed by §4?
>
> I see no reason to believe that the DFSG applies to things like the
> name of a program, like it does not covers patents.
Then
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The fact that it's a restriction on derived works (§3) that is not
>explicitly allowed by §4?
I see no reason to believe that the DFSG applies to things like the
name of a program, like it does not covers patents.
There has never been a list of "explicitly allowed" requir
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:28:57 -0500 Charles Fry wrote:
> > > Does anyone have any objections to my claims here? If not, then I
> > > will request that new Pear packages using the PHP License be
> > > accepted, and I'll close the current RC bugs against Pear packages
> > > licenced under the PHP Lic
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:15:37 -0500 Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:57:18PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > | 4. Products derived from this software may not be called "PHP",
> > | nor may "PHP" appear in their name, without prior written
> > | permission from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yo
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 03:02:29 -0800 Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >As a reminder, I see this clause as non-free because it starts as a
> > >name-change clause, but then goes beyond and forbids an entire
> > >class of names for deriv
9 matches
Mail list logo
