Re: Free art license, CC and DFSG

2007-03-10 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:35:57 -0500 Evan Prodromou wrote: [...] That includes the amended revocation and attribution clauses that Francesco is concerned with; we thought they were sufficiently softened that they were not an effective prevention of licensors exercising their freedom. A

Re: Free art license, CC and DFSG

2007-03-10 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:21:34 + (GMT) MJ Ray wrote: Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] [...] I also believe that a large number of debian-legal participants have said that the DRM clause, as it stands, is free enough to allow distribution under DRM if such DRM is not effective

Re: Debian-approved creative/content license?

2007-03-10 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On 3/11/07, Michael Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've read up and found the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses are specifically disallowed by Debian (well GFDL with non-invariant sections seems ok, but does that make sense for creative/audio content?). Looking further, I could not find any

Re: Debian-approved creative/content license?

2007-03-10 Thread Ben Finney
Michael Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Looking further, I could not find any Debian-approved licenses for creative (non-software) works [2], [3]. Is the Debian approach to just use a software license like GPL or BSD for creative content? Those licenses can apply to any software, not just