2008/9/8 Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080907 19:57]:
Hmmm, let???s see: If some company takes a hypothetical AGPL-licensed
variant of OpenOffice, improves it heavily and incompatibly, and it
becomes the new de-facto standard for office document
Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, let’s see: If some company takes a hypothetical AGPL-licensed
variant of OpenOffice [...] put it on terminal servers, maybe with
expensive access ...
... then, in the spirit of Free Software, I’ll be thankful that due to
the AGPL I, as a user,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's so non-free about requiring the same network that's providing
the interface to somehow and vaguely facilitate the conveying of the
source?
It's an extra required cost on top of one's use of the software.
Lawyers will have to decide, but
2008/9/10 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anyways, I don't think the good intentions are misguided here, unless
you want to argue that the GPL itself is misguided. The two licenses
are nearly identical, after all.
A single sentence, even a single word, can change everything in a
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's so non-free about requiring the same network that's
providing the interface to somehow and vaguely facilitate the
conveying of the source?
It's an extra required cost on top of one's use of the
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyways, I don't think the good intentions are misguided here,
unless you want to argue that the GPL itself is misguided. The two
licenses are nearly identical, after all.
If the two licenses are nearly identical, then surely the difference
in
Sehr geehrte Dame, sehr geehrter Herr
Am 24./25. September 2008 um 8.00h ist es zum 8ten mal soweit. Der Kongress
eHealthCare.ch wird im GZI Kongresszentrum, Nottwil LU eröffnet.
Seien Sie mit dabei, wenn über 1500 Healthprofessionals über Neuheiten,
Innovationen und Erfahrungen im
2008/9/10 MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's so non-free about requiring the same network that's providing
the interface to somehow and vaguely facilitate the conveying of the
source?
It's an extra required cost on top of one's use of the
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2008/9/10 MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's so non-free about requiring the same network that's
providing the interface to somehow and vaguely facilitate the
conveying of the source?
2008/9/10 Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And I argue that this extra cost is no greater than the cost of
providing the network interface that's triggering this clause in the
first place.
This is plainly false: There is, at minimum, additional
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2008/9/10 Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And I argue that this extra cost is no greater than the cost of
providing the network interface that's triggering this clause in
the first place.
2008/9/10 Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2008/9/10 Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And I argue that this extra cost is no greater than the cost of
providing the network interface that's
12 matches
Mail list logo
