"Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> 2008/9/10 Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > "Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> And I argue that this extra cost is no greater than the cost of
> >> providing the network interface that's triggering this clause in
> >> the first place.
[…]

> I have been interpreting the AGPL […] that these additional costs
> can be transferred onto third parties for whom the cost is probably
> negligible

That's a different argument to your earlier message.

You can't argue both "zero additional costs" *and* "non-zero
additional costs which are negligible for some parties in some
circumstances". Which is it?

-- 
 \        “What if the Hokey Pokey IS what it's all about?” —anonymous |
  `\                                                                   |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to