On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:28:25 -0700 (PDT) Walter Landry wrote:
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
[...]
So I think it's misleading to refer to “modified versions of the GPL”,
since modified versions aren't the GPL any more. If you want to permit
an action in a license text, it
Francesco Poli f...@firenze.linux.it writes:
...and call it by a name other than GPL!
I am under the impression that this is what Ben meant, but I'll wait
for him to clarify.
Right. My point is that it's not helpful to say “modified versions of
the GPL” are allowed, since at that point the
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010, Dererk wrote:
1. You may use, modify, and redistribute the software under the
terms of the GPL version 2 as distributed here:
2. You may use, modify, and redistribute the software under the
terms of the GPL version 3, as found in the file COPYING and
3 matches
Mail list logo
