On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 00:54:22 -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Hey,
Let's tackle this from a different angle. What were the ongoing
concerns and aren't they solved yet? Who do I need to talk to in order
to change the license?
The DPL.
AFAIK when the logo license was changed, the lawyer
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 00:54:22 -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Let's tackle this from a different angle. What were the ongoing
concerns and aren't they solved yet? Who do I need to talk to in order
to change the license?
The DPL.
AFAIK when the logo license was
Gustavo Franco wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 7:13 PM, MJ Ray m...@phonecoop.coop wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
* Btw, if it was the open logo, we're not talking about software. DFSG
quote about Derived Works states original software;
I feel that's unacceptable - the logo is software,
Legal,
I've run across a company using the Debian logo slightly modified in a
way that appears to violate the logo license (at least in my reading of
it): its use is not in reference to the Debian project. The company
site can be found here: http://www.catalystcareergroup.com/
Not sure
4 matches
Mail list logo
