On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 03:32:18PM +1200, Dan Wallis wrote: > 2011/6/24 Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org>: > > However, in reading the bug log my understanding is the upstream author's > > position is that the GPL does not require dynamically-linked libraries to be > > distributed under the same license terms. I don't believe this is an > > accurate interpretation of the GPL as written, but if Jean-Yves is the sole > > copyright holder of the work, then this is a clarification of the intended > > license, which I believe is sufficient for Debian's purposes. If there are > > other copyright holders, we would need to get similar clarification of > > intent, or an OpenSSL linking exception, from each of them.
> That's great news. Thanks. :) > Pascal, as the package maintainer, Pascal is no longer the maintainer, actually; the maintainer is now LIU Qi. But the @bugs.debian.org address reaches him, so I guess he's following along. :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110629065239.ge29...@virgil.dodds.net
