Re: Standard implementation of constant, copyright or not ?

2015-01-15 Thread Ángel González
On 15/01/15 23:39, Guilherme Brondani Torri wrote: Thank you Walter. Perhaps I should be more specific about the usage of the headers. The included headers are distributed verbatim. The headers are included verbatim (stored as a constant string) into the binary. The headers provide physical c

Re: Re: Standard implementation of constant, copyright or not ?

2015-01-15 Thread Guilherme Brondani Torri
Thank you Walter. Perhaps I should be more specific about the usage of the headers. The included headers are distributed verbatim. The headers are included verbatim (stored as a constant string) into the binary. The headers provide physical constants and physical concepts to a model compiler.

Re: Standard implementation of constant, copyright or not ?

2015-01-15 Thread Walter Landry
Guilherme Brondani Torri wrote: > I am currently maintaining the ADMS package (LGPL 2.1). > > The package is now hosted at: > https://github.com/Qucs/ADMS > > The two headers that are causing us trouble are these: > https://github.com/Qucs/ADMS/blob/master/admsXml/constants.vams > https://github

Re: Re: Standard implementation of constant, copyright or not ?

2015-01-15 Thread Geoffrey Coram
Hi, On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 21:08 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: Hi, I plan to package adms on the behalf of debian science in order to package qucs. I have a legal problem: Some file are : Copyright 2007Accellera Organization, Inc. Standard definitions This file contains the standard d

Re: Re: Standard implementation of constant, copyright or not ?

2015-01-15 Thread Guilherme Brondani Torri
I am currently maintaining the ADMS package (LGPL 2.1). The package is now hosted at: https://github.com/Qucs/ADMS The two headers that are causing us trouble are these: https://github.com/Qucs/ADMS/blob/master/admsXml/constants.vams https://github.com/Qucs/ADMS/blob/master/admsXml/disciplines.v