.
Cheers,
Julien
--
Julien Cristau julien.cris...@logilab.fr
Logilab http://www.logilab.fr/
Informatique scientifique gestion de connaissances
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 07:34:50 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
The major issue seems to be that the Joy plymouth theme mixes parts
released under CC-by-sa-v3.0 and parts released under GPLv2+.
Since CC-by-sa-v3.0 is incompatible with GPLv2+, I would say that the
resulting work is legally
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 19:03:01 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
reopen 678746
thanks
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:43:12 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 07:34:50 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
The major issue seems to be that the Joy plymouth theme mixes parts
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 00:52:36 +, Wols Lists wrote:
Any attempt to sue a European distributor would hopefully (a) get shut
down damn fast, and (b) be a painful experience for the plaintiff.
Sounds like wishful thinking to me.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 13:58:10 +0100, Rudolf Polzer wrote:
Hi,
the S3TC texture compression scheme is covered by an US patent, as described
in
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2010-March/005439.html
Lots of stuff is covered by US patents.
Debian mostly disregards patents
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 14:55:31 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
d) get the DOUL-with license changed in time for Squeeze,
That's not going to happen, fwiw.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 00:54:22 -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Hey,
Let's tackle this from a different angle. What were the ongoing
concerns and aren't they solved yet? Who do I need to talk to in order
to change the license?
The DPL.
AFAIK when the logo license was changed, the lawyer
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 21:12:24 +0200, Pompee William wrote:
Hello,
I understand the fact this feature isn't currently used and sounds
like FUD, but why such a clause does exist for the logo without
Debian? It
assumes that in case of damages implying the use of the logo, the Debian
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:56:31 +0100, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
Hello,
While conducting routine reading, I saw that debhelper is released under
the GPL license. Since debhelper includes bits of itself in the package
it manages, does this mean that I cannot use debhelper for packaging
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 14:42:46 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
I personally think that *none* of them[1] meet the DFSG.
Yes, you've said that multiple times now.
Unfortunately, FTP-masters seem to disagree with me...
Anyone who would like to read further details on my view on the topic
could
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 08:44:12 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Karl Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* line 81-83: OpenVision
also retains copyright to derivative works of the Source Code, whether
created by OpenVision or by a third party. I think this could threat
this software
On Sun, Jul 1, 2007 at 12:49:58 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
If it says version N or later, we should of course point to the
*earliest* version to give users the choice which version they want.
I don't understand this of course, nor do I understand how the file we
point to relates to the
On Fri, Mar 9, 2007 at 08:34:30 +0100, Mathieu Stumpf wrote:
Great, there are 996 songs under CC-by (2.0+2.5) if I just look at
dogmazic.net.
CC-* before 3.0 are non-free, CC-by 3.0 is probably ok, IIRC.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Fri, Mar 9, 2007 at 13:41:35 +0100, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
Julien Cristau escribe:
CC-* before 3.0 are non-free
Why exactly!?
See http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary (this is about 2.0, but I
think the same problems apply to 2.5).
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Thu, Mar 8, 2007 at 15:34:32 -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
For some companies I would agree, but as has been said, intel has been
opensourcing a lot lately, and as that FAQ says, later versions are
free, which shows they must have some concern.
s/free/distributable/
None of the ipw*
On Tue, Mar 6, 2007 at 14:19:19 +, Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
Hello
I am looking at the python-sybase software
(http://python-sybase.sourceforge.net) and it isn't packaged yet in
Debian. So I had a look at the licence to see if it is possible to
package. I think it is, I am however no
16 matches
Mail list logo
