Branden,
can you do me the favor and try to clearify for me when in your opinion the
DSFG 4 clause is
applicable for a license.
Question 1:
Suppose you have a program source foo.c with some license.
Suppose this license restricts foo.c from being modified but allows
distribution of foo.c
plus
sorry, I shouldn't have tried to answer your private mail in haste while
getting my coat to rush to the office.
I made a two typos ad least and one important one:
as of now it would mean that for each individual work under LPPL you have
to
folow its license meaning you have to rename the work
If that's the feeling and attitude of the majority of the people here then
the whole exercise
is pointless. I hope this is a singular incidence. If not please tell us so
and we might as well stop
the discussion
regards
frank
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
True, that is why i said in b) LPPL-x (indicating a different version of
LPPL
okay?
cheers
frank (out of the run until tonight probably)
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: Glenn Maynard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Juli 2002 09:37
An: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
4 matches
Mail list logo
