True, that is why i said in b) LPPL-x (indicating a different version of LPPL
okay? cheers frank (out of the run until tonight probably) -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- Von: Glenn Maynard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Juli 2002 09:37 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: forwarded message from Jeff Licquia [OT] On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:03:11AM +0200, Frank Mittelbach wrote: > a) to improve LPPL (which has several deficiencies) > b) to come to a common understanding that LPPL-x is complient with DFSG as > well as FSF etc or failing b, b2) determine why the LPPL fails the DFSG, and what can be done about it. Don't assume a license is DFSG-free because you've read (or written) the license, read the DFSG and ticked off each guideline. Human judgment and existing practice come into the equation. -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
