Andrew Saunders wrote:
An even greater worry is a clause that appears to make the Project
responsible for enforcing compliance with the license terms:
You agree to use your best efforts to see that any user of the
Software licensed hereunder complies with this Agreement.
First of all,
Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Does it make any difference that the company is question has been
dissolved and they basically dropped everything into the public domain?
Yes, it *would*
From http://www.loonygames.com/content/1.10/guest/
---
Around July, Crack first missed payroll. August came
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 10:42:14PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Does it make any difference that the company is question has been
dissolved and they basically dropped everything into the public domain?
I found
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/1997/debian-devel-199705/msg00759.html
It
On Thu, May 13, 2004, Niklas Vainio wrote:
abuse-sfx has been orphaned so there is no maintainer to do that. So I will
do it.
I am adopting the Abuse packages, but I first wqnt to get rid
of abuse-sfx by providing DFSG-free replacements for all sounds. I
currently have replacements for the
On Thu, 13 May 2004 11:13:03 +0200
Sam Hocevar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am adopting the Abuse packages, but I first wqnt to get rid of
abuse-sfx by providing DFSG-free replacements for all sounds.
I just noticed that the abuse-lib package's copyright file tells us
who owns the right to the
On Thu, May 13, 2004, Andrew Saunders wrote:
Apparently they're the property of one Bobby Prince, who can be
reached via http://www.bpmusic.com. Perhaps you could persuade him to
release them under DFSG-Free terms?
Uhm, right. I'll try that.
--
Sam.
Package: abuse-sfx
Version: 2.00-8
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
To view the license terms, see the copyright file:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/a/abuse-sfx/abuse-sfx_2.00-8/copyright
First off, the license only grants the right to *use* the software:
For
7 matches
Mail list logo
