On Mon, Jan 23, 2012, at 10:17 PM, Francesco Poli wrote:
I am not sure your addition non-permissive term really follows
what is allowed by clause 7b...
...
Please note the word preservation.
You are correct. I apologize for the distraction. So that
I'm tracking an actual submission for
I have approval to release HTSQL (http://htsql) under the AGPLv3
license so long as it contains an attribution requirement as
permitted by section 7 of the GPL. We also plan to release some
other components of our RexDB work under a more liberal
permissive license with a similar attribution
I apologize, the repository is https://github.com/tip-o-the-hat/fmn
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012, at 04:31 PM, Clark C. Evans wrote:
I have approval to release HTSQL (http://htsql) under the AGPLv3
license so long as it contains an attribution requirement as
permitted by section 7 of the GPL. We also
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:31:55 -0500 Clark C. Evans wrote:
I have approval to release HTSQL (http://htsql) under the AGPLv3
license
I won't repeat myself here, but, as you already know, I am *not* happy
to see another project that adopts the GNU AfferoGPL v3: I think that
this license choice
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012, at 12:08 AM, Francesco Poli wrote:
https://github.com/tip-o-the-hat/fmn/blob/master/GPL-FMN-TERM
describes itself as an additional permissive term, but seems to
actually be an additional requirement.
Quite right. I was reading section 7 incorrectly and had
mentally
5 matches
Mail list logo
