Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ?

2003-08-30 Thread Mathieu Roy
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté : On 2003-08-29 19:36:24 +0100 Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and so you can regive his speech (you can use the exact same wording if you want). I am pretty sure that you are wrong on this, too. Sorry. Sure, if he got proofs he previously use that

Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ?

2003-08-30 Thread MJ Ray
On 2003-08-30 10:44:07 +0100 Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I said before, I think the GFDL provide the freedom that matters for a documentation. I agree with you for the documentation part, but I don't think it gives the freedom that matters for the whole work and that's needed.

Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ?

2003-08-29 Thread Mathieu Roy
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté : Please stop cc'ing me. Read the code of conduct. Can't your mailer delete duplicate? I do not want to be guessing whether the person I'm replying to subscribed to the list each time I send a mail to the list. On 2003-08-29 17:32:33 +0100 Mathieu Roy

Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ?

2003-08-29 Thread MJ Ray
Please stop cc'ing me. Read the code of conduct. On 2003-08-29 17:32:33 +0100 Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But describing a software is not the most interesting thing. While describing and analysing a book is the most interesting thing you can do with a book (apart from reading it,

Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ?

2003-08-29 Thread MJ Ray
On 2003-08-29 18:57:16 +0100 Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can't your mailer delete duplicate? Yes. I do not want to be guessing whether the person I'm replying to subscribed to the list each time I send a mail to the list. You do not have to. Read the code of conduct. You also

Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ?

2003-08-29 Thread Brian T. Sniffen
Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté : Please stop cc'ing me. Read the code of conduct. Can't your mailer delete duplicate? I do not want to be guessing whether the person I'm replying to subscribed to the list each time I send a mail to the list.

Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ?

2003-08-29 Thread Brian T. Sniffen
Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If someone explains you what is free software, do you need to be granted to reuse his speech? You don't: if you understand him, you can regive his speech at the infinite. If I want to actually reuse his speech in either the sense of a recording or

Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ?

2003-08-29 Thread MJ Ray
On 2003-08-29 19:36:24 +0100 Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and so you can regive his speech (you can use the exact same wording if you want). I am pretty sure that you are wrong on this, too. Sorry.