* Hendrik Weimer [110514 08:41]:
> > Both of the packages claim to be GPL'ed as per COPYING, and I wonder whether
> > this is acceptable for Debian. Probably it is, as ax25-apps is in
> > main.
>
> While the GPL strongly recommends putting copyright notices in each
> source file, it does not requi
Michael Tautschnig writes:
> Both of the packages claim to be GPL'ed as per COPYING, and I wonder whether
> this is acceptable for Debian. Probably it is, as ax25-apps is in
> main.
While the GPL strongly recommends putting copyright notices in each
source file, it does not require to do so. In
I'd suggest contacting ax25-apps upstream to clarify the situation:
http://www.linux-ax25.org/wiki/Ax25-apps
Also, should ax_emergency_listen just be merged into ax25-apps? Then
there would be no need for code duplication.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Guido Trentalancia
wrote:
> I'll just make an hypotesis. The origin is not very important as long as
> the original author doesn't care about claiming it. Being GNU GPL (this
> is clearly stated in COPYRIGHT), there is no warranty in any case. If
> there is no war
Hello again Michael !
First of all, thanks again very much for all your support and help.
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 22:35 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Dear debian-legal,
>
> While reviewing the ax_emergency_listen package [1] I found that several
> source
> files lack both copyright and licen
Dear debian-legal,
While reviewing the ax_emergency_listen package [1] I found that several source
files lack both copyright and license information. The reason for this lack,
however, is that they were taken verbatim from ax25-apps *where there is no such
information in source files*, as upstream
6 matches
Mail list logo
